Evidence Act 2008
57Provisional relevance
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 57
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Evidence Act 2008.
57 Provisional relevance
(1) If the determination of the question whether evidence adduced by a party is relevant depends on the court making another finding (including a finding that the evidence is what the party claims it to be), the court may find that the evidence is relevant—
(a) if it is reasonably open to make that finding; or
(b) subject to further evidence being admitted at a later stage of the proceeding that will make it reasonably open to make that finding.
S. 57(2) amended by No. 63/2014 s. 7(12).
(2) Without limiting subsection (1), if the relevance of evidence of an act done by a person depends on the court making a finding that the person and one or more other persons had, or were acting in furtherance of, a common purpose (whether to effect an unlawful conspiracy or as part of involvement in the commission of an offence or otherwise), the court may use the evidence itself in determining whether the common purpose existed.
1 Subsection (2) differs from section 57(2) of the Commonwealth Act and New South Wales Act.
2 Subdivision (1) of Division 1 of Part II of the Crimes Act 1958 deals with complicity in commission of offences.
58 Inferences as to relevance
(1) If a question arises as to the relevance of a document or thing, the court may examine it and may draw any reasonable inference from it, including an inference as to its authenticity or identity.
(2) Subsection (1) does not limit the matters from which inferences may properly be drawn.
Part 3.2—Hearsay
Division 1—The hearsay rule
59 The hearsay rule—exclusion of hearsay evidence
(1) Evidence of a previous representation made by a person is not admissible to prove the existence of a fact that it can reasonably be supposed that the person intended to assert by the representation.
(2) Such a fact is in this Part referred to as an asserted fact.
(2A) For the purposes of determining under subsection (1) whether it can reasonably be supposed that the person intended to assert a particular fact by the representation, the court may have regard to the circumstances in which the representation was made.
Subsection (2A) was inserted as a response to the decision of the Supreme Court of New South Wales in R v Hannes (2000) 158 FLR 359.
1 The Commonwealth Act and New South Wales Act include another subsection.
2 Specific exceptions to the hearsay rule are as follows—
• evidence relevant for a non-hearsay purpose (section 60)