43Prior inconsistent statement of witness

### 43 Prior inconsistent statement of witness > > (1)  A witness may be cross-examined about a prior inconsistent statement alleged to have been made by the witness whether or not – > > > > > > (a) complete particulars of the statement have been given to the witness; or > > > > > > > (b) a document containing a record of the statement has been shown to the witness. > > > (2)  If, in cross-examination, a witness does not admit that he or she made a prior inconsistent statement, the cross-examiner is not to adduce evidence of the statement otherwise than from the witness unless, in the cross-examination, the cross-examiner – > > > > > > (a) informed the witness of enough of the circumstances of the making of the statement to enable the witness to identify the statement; and > > > > > > > (b) drew the witness's attention to so much of the statement as is inconsistent with the witness's evidence. > > > (3)  For the purpose of adducing evidence of the statement, a party may re-open the party's case.