sec.92Admissibility of documentary evidence as to facts in issue

### sec.92 Admissibility of documentary evidence as to facts in issue In any proceeding (not being a criminal proceeding) where direct oral evidence of a fact would be admissible, any statement contained in a document and tending to establish that fact shall, subject to this part, be admissible as evidence of that fact if— the maker of the statement had personal knowledge of the matters dealt with by the statement, and is called as a witness in the proceeding; or the document is or forms part of a record relating to any undertaking and made in the course of that undertaking from information supplied (whether directly or indirectly) by persons who had, or may reasonably be supposed to have had, personal knowledge of the matters dealt with in the information they supplied, and the person who supplied the information recorded in the statement in question is called as a witness in the proceeding. The condition in subsection (1) that the maker of the statement or the person who supplied the information, as the case may be, be called as a witness need not be satisfied where— the maker or supplier is dead, or unfit by reason of bodily or mental condition to attend as a witness; or the maker or supplier is out of the State and it is not reasonably practicable to secure the attendance of the maker or supplier; or the maker or supplier can not with reasonable diligence be found or identified; or it can not reasonably be supposed (having regard to the time which has elapsed since the maker or supplier made the statement, or supplied the information, and to all the circumstances) that the maker or supplier would have any recollection of the matters dealt with by the statement the maker made or in the information the supplier supplied; or no party to the proceeding who would have the right to cross-examine the maker or supplier requires the maker or supplier being called as a witness; or at any stage of the proceeding it appears to the court that, having regard to all the circumstances of the case, undue delay or expense would be caused by calling the maker or supplier as a witness. The court may act on hearsay evidence for the purpose of deciding any of the matters mentioned in subsection (2) (a) , (b) , (c) , (d) or (f) . For the purposes of this part, a statement contained in a document is made by a person if— it was written, made, dictated or otherwise produced by the person; or it was recorded with the person’s knowledge; or it was recorded in the course of and ancillary to a proceeding; or it was recognised by the person as the person’s statement by signing, initialling or otherwise in writing. s 92 amd 2000 No. 58 s 2 sch (sec.92-ssec.1) In any proceeding (not being a criminal proceeding) where direct oral evidence of a fact would be admissible, any statement contained in a document and tending to establish that fact shall, subject to this part, be admissible as evidence of that fact if— the maker of the statement had personal knowledge of the matters dealt with by the statement, and is called as a witness in the proceeding; or the document is or forms part of a record relating to any undertaking and made in the course of that undertaking from information supplied (whether directly or indirectly) by persons who had, or may reasonably be supposed to have had, personal knowledge of the matters dealt with in the information they supplied, and the person who supplied the information recorded in the statement in question is called as a witness in the proceeding. (sec.92-ssec.2) The condition in subsection (1) that the maker of the statement or the person who supplied the information, as the case may be, be called as a witness need not be satisfied where— the maker or supplier is dead, or unfit by reason of bodily or mental condition to attend as a witness; or the maker or supplier is out of the State and it is not reasonably practicable to secure the attendance of the maker or supplier; or the maker or supplier can not with reasonable diligence be found or identified; or it can not reasonably be supposed (having regard to the time which has elapsed since the maker or supplier made the statement, or supplied the information, and to all the circumstances) that the maker or supplier would have any recollection of the matters dealt with by the statement the maker made or in the information the supplier supplied; or no party to the proceeding who would have the right to cross-examine the maker or supplier requires the maker or supplier being called as a witness; or at any stage of the proceeding it appears to the court that, having regard to all the circumstances of the case, undue delay or expense would be caused by calling the maker or supplier as a witness. (sec.92-ssec.3) The court may act on hearsay evidence for the purpose of deciding any of the matters mentioned in subsection (2) (a) , (b) , (c) , (d) or (f) . (sec.92-ssec.4) For the purposes of this part, a statement contained in a document is made by a person if— it was written, made, dictated or otherwise produced by the person; or it was recorded with the person’s knowledge; or it was recorded in the course of and ancillary to a proceeding; or it was recognised by the person as the person’s statement by signing, initialling or otherwise in writing. - (a) the maker of the statement had personal knowledge of the matters dealt with by the statement, and is called as a witness in the proceeding; or - (b) the document is or forms part of a record relating to any undertaking and made in the course of that undertaking from information supplied (whether directly or indirectly) by persons who had, or may reasonably be supposed to have had, personal knowledge of the matters dealt with in the information they supplied, and the person who supplied the information recorded in the statement in question is called as a witness in the proceeding. - (a) the maker or supplier is dead, or unfit by reason of bodily or mental condition to attend as a witness; or - (b) the maker or supplier is out of the State and it is not reasonably practicable to secure the attendance of the maker or supplier; or - (c) the maker or supplier can not with reasonable diligence be found or identified; or - (d) it can not reasonably be supposed (having regard to the time which has elapsed since the maker or supplier made the statement, or supplied the information, and to all the circumstances) that the maker or supplier would have any recollection of the matters dealt with by the statement the maker made or in the information the supplier supplied; or - (e) no party to the proceeding who would have the right to cross-examine the maker or supplier requires the maker or supplier being called as a witness; or - (f) at any stage of the proceeding it appears to the court that, having regard to all the circumstances of the case, undue delay or expense would be caused by calling the maker or supplier as a witness. - (a) it was written, made, dictated or otherwise produced by the person; or - (b) it was recorded with the person’s knowledge; or - (c) it was recorded in the course of and ancillary to a proceeding; or - (d) it was recognised by the person as the person’s statement by signing, initialling or otherwise in writing.