QLDIn ForceAct
Evidence Act 1977
sec.18Proof of previous inconsistent statement of witness
Start here
Get a plain-English read of sec.18
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Evidence Act 1977.
### sec.18 Proof of previous inconsistent statement of witness
If a witness upon cross-examination as to a former statement made by the witness relative to the subject matter of the proceeding and inconsistent with the present testimony of the witness does not distinctly admit that the witness has made such statement, proof may be given that the witness did in fact make it.
However, before such proof can be given, the circumstances of the supposed statement sufficient to designate the particular occasion must be mentioned to the witness and the witness must be asked whether or not the witness has made such statement.
(sec.18-ssec.1) If a witness upon cross-examination as to a former statement made by the witness relative to the subject matter of the proceeding and inconsistent with the present testimony of the witness does not distinctly admit that the witness has made such statement, proof may be given that the witness did in fact make it.
(sec.18-ssec.2) However, before such proof can be given, the circumstances of the supposed statement sufficient to designate the particular occasion must be mentioned to the witness and the witness must be asked whether or not the witness has made such statement.