QLDIn ForceAct
Evidence Act 1977
sec.103ZZADirection on evidence of post-offence relationship
Start here
Get a plain-English read of sec.103ZZA
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Evidence Act 1977.
### sec.103ZZA Direction on evidence of post-offence relationship
This section applies if evidence is given, or is likely to be given, or a question is asked, or is likely to be asked, of a witness that tends to suggest that, after the sexual offence the subject of the criminal proceeding is alleged to have been committed, the complainant—
continued a relationship with the defendant; or
otherwise continued to communicate with the defendant.
The judge must direct the jury that experience shows that—
people may react differently to non-consensual sexual activity and there is no typical, normal or proper response to non-consensual sexual activity; and
some people who are subjected to non-consensual sexual activity will never again contact the person who subjected them to the activity, while others—
may continue a relationship with that person; or
may otherwise continue to communicate with that person; and
there may be good reasons why a person who is subjected to non-consensual sexual activity—
may continue a relationship with the person who subjected them to the activity; or
may otherwise continue to communicate with that person.
The person was overborne by the abuse of a relationship of authority, trust or dependence.
The person fears family dissolution.
The person has a fear of ostracism from their community.
s 103ZZA ins 2024 No. 5 s 59
(sec.103ZZA-ssec.1) This section applies if evidence is given, or is likely to be given, or a question is asked, or is likely to be asked, of a witness that tends to suggest that, after the sexual offence the subject of the criminal proceeding is alleged to have been committed, the complainant— continued a relationship with the defendant; or otherwise continued to communicate with the defendant.
(sec.103ZZA-ssec.2) The judge must direct the jury that experience shows that— people may react differently to non-consensual sexual activity and there is no typical, normal or proper response to non-consensual sexual activity; and some people who are subjected to non-consensual sexual activity will never again contact the person who subjected them to the activity, while others— may continue a relationship with that person; or may otherwise continue to communicate with that person; and there may be good reasons why a person who is subjected to non-consensual sexual activity— may continue a relationship with the person who subjected them to the activity; or may otherwise continue to communicate with that person. The person was overborne by the abuse of a relationship of authority, trust or dependence. The person fears family dissolution. The person has a fear of ostracism from their community.
- (a) continued a relationship with the defendant; or
- (b) otherwise continued to communicate with the defendant.
- (a) people may react differently to non-consensual sexual activity and there is no typical, normal or proper response to non-consensual sexual activity; and
- (b) some people who are subjected to non-consensual sexual activity will never again contact the person who subjected them to the activity, while others— (i) may continue a relationship with that person; or (ii) may otherwise continue to communicate with that person; and
- (i) may continue a relationship with that person; or
- (ii) may otherwise continue to communicate with that person; and
- (c) there may be good reasons why a person who is subjected to non-consensual sexual activity— (i) may continue a relationship with the person who subjected them to the activity; or (ii) may otherwise continue to communicate with that person. Examples of good reasons— 1 The person was overborne by the abuse of a relationship of authority, trust or dependence. 2 The person fears family dissolution. 3 The person has a fear of ostracism from their community.
- (i) may continue a relationship with the person who subjected them to the activity; or
- (ii) may otherwise continue to communicate with that person.
- 1 The person was overborne by the abuse of a relationship of authority, trust or dependence.
- 2 The person fears family dissolution.
- 3 The person has a fear of ostracism from their community.
- (i) may continue a relationship with that person; or
- (ii) may otherwise continue to communicate with that person; and
- (i) may continue a relationship with the person who subjected them to the activity; or
- (ii) may otherwise continue to communicate with that person.
- 1 The person was overborne by the abuse of a relationship of authority, trust or dependence.
- 2 The person fears family dissolution.
- 3 The person has a fear of ostracism from their community.