sec.101Witness’s previous statement, if proved, to be evidence of facts stated

### sec.101 Witness’s previous statement, if proved, to be evidence of facts stated Where in any proceeding— a previous inconsistent or contradictory statement made by a person called as a witness in that proceeding is proved by virtue of section 17 , 18 or 19 ; or a previous statement made by a person called as aforesaid is proved for the purpose of rebutting a suggestion that the person’s evidence has been fabricated; that statement shall be admissible as evidence of any fact stated therein of which direct oral evidence by the person would be admissible. Subsection (1) shall apply to any statement or information proved by virtue of section 94 (1) (b) as it applies to a previous inconsistent or contradictory statement made by a person called as a witness which is proved as mentioned in subsection (1) (a) . Nothing in this part shall affect any of the rules of law relating to the circumstances in which, where a person called as a witness in any proceeding is cross-examined on a document used by the person to refresh the person’s memory, that document may be made evidence in that proceeding, and where a document or any part of a document is received in evidence in any such proceeding by virtue of any such rule of law, any statement made in that document or part by the person using the document to refresh the person’s memory shall by virtue of this subsection be admissible as evidence of any fact stated therein of which direct oral evidence by the person would be admissible. (sec.101-ssec.1) Where in any proceeding— a previous inconsistent or contradictory statement made by a person called as a witness in that proceeding is proved by virtue of section 17 , 18 or 19 ; or a previous statement made by a person called as aforesaid is proved for the purpose of rebutting a suggestion that the person’s evidence has been fabricated; that statement shall be admissible as evidence of any fact stated therein of which direct oral evidence by the person would be admissible. (sec.101-ssec.2) Subsection (1) shall apply to any statement or information proved by virtue of section 94 (1) (b) as it applies to a previous inconsistent or contradictory statement made by a person called as a witness which is proved as mentioned in subsection (1) (a) . (sec.101-ssec.3) Nothing in this part shall affect any of the rules of law relating to the circumstances in which, where a person called as a witness in any proceeding is cross-examined on a document used by the person to refresh the person’s memory, that document may be made evidence in that proceeding, and where a document or any part of a document is received in evidence in any such proceeding by virtue of any such rule of law, any statement made in that document or part by the person using the document to refresh the person’s memory shall by virtue of this subsection be admissible as evidence of any fact stated therein of which direct oral evidence by the person would be admissible. - (a) a previous inconsistent or contradictory statement made by a person called as a witness in that proceeding is proved by virtue of section 17 , 18 or 19 ; or - (b) a previous statement made by a person called as aforesaid is proved for the purpose of rebutting a suggestion that the person’s evidence has been fabricated;