NTIn ForceAct
Evidence Act 1939
21QOffence to publish recorded statement
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 21Q
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Evidence Act 1939.
21Q Offence to publish recorded statement
(1) A person commits an offence if:
(a) the person intentionally publishes a recorded statement; and
(b) the person does not have authority to publish the recorded
statement and the person is reckless in relation to that
circumstance.
Maximum penalty: 100 penalty units or imprisonment for
12 months.
(2) For subsection (1), a person has authority to publish a recorded
statement only if the person publishes the recorded statement in
connection with:
(a) the investigation of, or a proceeding for, an offence in relation
to which the recorded statement is prepared; or
Evidence Act 1939 16
(b) a rehearing, retrial or appeal in relation to the proceeding.
(3) In this section:
person includes the complainant who made the recorded
statement.
publish means communicate or disseminate information in a way
or to an extent that makes it available to, or likely to come to the
notice of, the public or a section of the public or anyone else not
lawfully entitled to the information.
21QA Leave required for unrepresented defendant to cross-examine
certain vulnerable witnesses
(1) This section applies if, in an examination of witnesses or a trial, a
defendant is not represented by a legal practitioner and the
defendant wishes to cross-examine a vulnerable witness.
(2) The defendant is not entitled to cross-examine the witness directly
unless the court grants leave.
(3) The court cannot grant leave under subsection (2) if the witness is
a child, or has a cognitive impairment or an intellectual disability.
(4) The court must not grant leave under subsection (2) unless
satisfied that the witness's ability to testify under cross-examination
will not be adversely affected if the defendant conducts the
cross-examination.
(5) In considering whether the witness's ability to testify will be
adversely affected, the court must have regard to any trauma or
distress that could be caused if the defendant conducts the
cross-examination.
(6) In considering whether to grant leave under subsection (2), the
court must not require the witness to give evidence about the
matters mentioned in subsections (4) and (5).
21QB Leave not given to directly cross-examine witness
(1) This section applies if the court does not grant leave under
section 21QA(2).
(2) The court must, as soon as practicable, explain to the defendant:
(a) the prohibition against directly cross-examining the witness
and the effect of the prohibition; and
Evidence Act 1939 17
(b) that if the defendant does not cross-examine the witness, the
defendant will not be permitted to adduce evidence in relation
to a fact in issue in order to contradict the evidence of the
witness; and
(c) that the defendant can arrange for a legal practitioner to
cross-examine the witness on the defendant's behalf; and
(d) that the defendant must notify the court of the name of the
arranged legal practitioner by a date specified by the court;
and
(e) that if the defendant does not wish to make such an
arrangement, or if the defendant fails to notify the court of the
name of a legal practitioner by the date specified:
(i) the court will decide whether it is necessary in the
interests of justice to appoint a legal practitioner to
cross-examine the witness for the defendant; and
(ii) if the court decides that it is necessary – the court may
appoint a legal practitioner to cross-examine the witness
for the defendant, or make any other order the court
considers necessary.
(3) If the defendant does not wish to make such an arrangement, or if
the defendant fails to notify the court of the name of a legal
practitioner by the date specified:
(a) the court must decide whether it is necessary in the interests
of justice to appoint a legal practitioner to cross-examine the
witness for the defendant; and
(b) if the court decides that it is necessary – the court may
appoint a legal practitioner (the appointed person) to cross-
examine the witness for the defendant, or make any other
order the court considers necessary.
(4) If the defendant wishes to cross-examine a vulnerable witness, the
defendant must put any question to the appointed person and the
appointed person must put the question to the witness, unless the
appointed person considers the question to be improper.
Notes for subsection (4)
1 The appointed person need not use the exact same words as the defendant
when putting a question.