QLDIn ForceAct
Environmental Protection Act 1994
sec.492Responsibility for acts or omissions of representatives
Start here
Get a plain-English read of sec.492
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Environmental Protection Act 1994.
### sec.492 Responsibility for acts or omissions of representatives
If, in a proceeding for an offence against this Act, it is relevant to prove a person’s state of mind about a particular act or omission, it is enough to show—
the act or omission was done or omitted to be done by a representative of the person within the scope of the representative’s actual or apparent authority; and
the representative had the state of mind.
An act or omission done or omitted to be done for a person by a representative of the person within the scope of the representative’s actual or apparent authority is taken, in a proceeding for an offence against this Act, to have been done or omitted to be done also by the person, unless the person proves the person took all reasonable steps to prevent the acts or omissions.
If—
an individual is convicted of an offence against this Act; and
the individual would not have been convicted of the offence if subsections (1) and (2) had not been enacted;
the individual is not liable to be punished by imprisonment for the offence.
In this section—
representative , of a person, means—
if the person is a corporation—
an executive officer, employee or agent of the corporation; and
if, under the Corporations Act , the corporation (the parent corporation ) controls another corporation or another corporation is a subsidiary of the parent corporation—
the controlled corporation or the subsidiary corporation; and
an executive officer, employee or agent of the controlled corporation or the subsidiary corporation; or
if the person is an individual—an employee or agent of the individual.
s 492 amd 2005 No. 53 s 86
(sec.492-ssec.1) If, in a proceeding for an offence against this Act, it is relevant to prove a person’s state of mind about a particular act or omission, it is enough to show— the act or omission was done or omitted to be done by a representative of the person within the scope of the representative’s actual or apparent authority; and the representative had the state of mind.
(sec.492-ssec.2) An act or omission done or omitted to be done for a person by a representative of the person within the scope of the representative’s actual or apparent authority is taken, in a proceeding for an offence against this Act, to have been done or omitted to be done also by the person, unless the person proves the person took all reasonable steps to prevent the acts or omissions.
(sec.492-ssec.3) If— an individual is convicted of an offence against this Act; and the individual would not have been convicted of the offence if subsections (1) and (2) had not been enacted; the individual is not liable to be punished by imprisonment for the offence.
(sec.492-ssec.4) In this section— representative , of a person, means— if the person is a corporation— an executive officer, employee or agent of the corporation; and if, under the Corporations Act , the corporation (the parent corporation ) controls another corporation or another corporation is a subsidiary of the parent corporation— the controlled corporation or the subsidiary corporation; and an executive officer, employee or agent of the controlled corporation or the subsidiary corporation; or if the person is an individual—an employee or agent of the individual.
- (a) the act or omission was done or omitted to be done by a representative of the person within the scope of the representative’s actual or apparent authority; and
- (b) the representative had the state of mind.
- (a) an individual is convicted of an offence against this Act; and
- (b) the individual would not have been convicted of the offence if subsections (1) and (2) had not been enacted;
- (a) if the person is a corporation— (i) an executive officer, employee or agent of the corporation; and (ii) if, under the Corporations Act , the corporation (the parent corporation ) controls another corporation or another corporation is a subsidiary of the parent corporation— (A) the controlled corporation or the subsidiary corporation; and (B) an executive officer, employee or agent of the controlled corporation or the subsidiary corporation; or
- (i) an executive officer, employee or agent of the corporation; and
- (ii) if, under the Corporations Act , the corporation (the parent corporation ) controls another corporation or another corporation is a subsidiary of the parent corporation— (A) the controlled corporation or the subsidiary corporation; and (B) an executive officer, employee or agent of the controlled corporation or the subsidiary corporation; or
- (A) the controlled corporation or the subsidiary corporation; and
- (B) an executive officer, employee or agent of the controlled corporation or the subsidiary corporation; or
- (b) if the person is an individual—an employee or agent of the individual.
- (i) an executive officer, employee or agent of the corporation; and
- (ii) if, under the Corporations Act , the corporation (the parent corporation ) controls another corporation or another corporation is a subsidiary of the parent corporation— (A) the controlled corporation or the subsidiary corporation; and (B) an executive officer, employee or agent of the controlled corporation or the subsidiary corporation; or
- (A) the controlled corporation or the subsidiary corporation; and
- (B) an executive officer, employee or agent of the controlled corporation or the subsidiary corporation; or
- (A) the controlled corporation or the subsidiary corporation; and
- (B) an executive officer, employee or agent of the controlled corporation or the subsidiary corporation; or