ACTIn ForceAct
Environment Protection Act 1997
153Due diligence
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 153
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Environment Protection Act 1997.
153 Due diligence
(1) It is a defence to a prosecution for an offence against section 137,
section 138, section 139, section 141, section 142 or section 147, or
an offence against a regulation that is prescribed for this section, that
the defendant exercised due diligence to prevent the act or omission
alleged to constitute the offence or an element of the offence.
(2) Without subsection (1), in deciding whether the defendant exercised
due diligence, the court may have regard to—
(a) if the defendant is a corporation—the steps taken by it—
(i) to ensure that people employed or engaged by it were
aware of the requirements of this Act and any relevant
environmental laws and standards relating to the
prevention or minimisation of environmental harm or
likely environmental harm; or
(ii) to ensure compliance with those laws and standards by
those people; or
(iii) to establish an environmental management system and to
ensure implementation and compliance with it; or
(b) if the defendant was the director of a corporation or other person
responsible for the management of the activity in relation to
which the environmental harm or likely environmental harm
happened—
(i) whether the defendant was personally familiar with the
requirements of this Act and any relevant environmental
laws and standards relating to the prevention or
minimisation of environmental harm or likely
environmental harm; or
(ii) whether the defendant had taken all reasonable steps to
comply with those laws and standards; or
(iii) the steps taken by the defendant to ensure other people for
whom it was relevant were familiar with this Act and any
relevant laws and standards, and compliance with those
laws and standards by those people; or
(iv) the steps taken by the defendant to establish an
environmental management system and to ensure
familiarity and compliance with it by other people for
whom it was relevant; or
(v) whether the defendant reacted immediately and personally
when the defendant became aware of any noncompliance
with the environmental management system or other
incident connected with the environmental harm or likely
environmental harm that happened; or
Defences Division 15.4
(c) if the defendant was an employee or other person whose
responsibilities did not extend to the management of the activity
in relation to which the environmental harm or likely
environmental harm happened—
(i) whether the defendant had taken all reasonable steps to
become familiar with this Act and any relevant
environmental laws and standards relating to the
prevention or minimisation of environmental harm or
likely environmental harm; or
(ii) whether the defendant had taken all reasonable steps to
comply with those laws and standards; or
(iii) whether the defendant had taken all reasonable steps to
become familiar, and comply, with any environmental
management system established by the corporation to the
extent that the system is relevant to the defendant’s
position; or
(iv) the steps taken by the defendant to prevent or minimise
environmental harm or likely environmental harm when
the defendant became aware of any incident connected
with the environmental harm or likely environmental harm
that happened or the likelihood of any such incident.