182Grounds for giving prohibition notice

182 Grounds for giving prohibition notice (1) The Regulatory Authority may give a prohibition notice to a person who is in any way involved in the provision of an approved education and care service if it considers that there may be an unacceptable risk of harm to a child or children if the person were allowed— (a) to remain on the education and care service premises; or (b) to provide education and care to children. (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), a person may be involved in the provision of an approved education and care service as any of the following— (a) an approved provider; Sch. s. 182(2)(b) substituted by No. 9/2017 s. 46(1)(a). (b) a nominated supervisor; (c) an educator; (d) a family day care educator; (e) an employee; (f) a contractor; Sch. s. 182(2)(g) substituted by No. 9/2017 s. 46(1)(b). (g) a volunteer; Sch. s. 182(2)(h) inserted by No. 9/2017 s. 46(1)(b). (h) a person who was formerly a person referred to in paragraphs (a) to (g) in relation to the approved education and care service— or in any other capacity. Sch. s. 182(3) inserted by No. 9/2017 s. 46(2). (3) The Regulatory Authority may give a prohibition notice to a person to— (a) prohibit the person from being nominated as a nominated supervisor if the Regulatory Authority considers the person is not a fit and proper person to be nominated as a nominated supervisor of a service; or (b) impose one or more conditions on the nomination of the person as a nominated supervisor that the Regulatory Authority considers appropriate, if the Regulatory Authority considers the person is a fit and proper person to be nominated as a nominated supervisor of a service subject to those conditions. Sch. s. 182(4) inserted by No. 53/2025 s. 89. (4) Without limiting subsection (1), the Regulatory Authority may give a prohibition notice to an approved provider if a related provider of the approved provider is subject to a prohibition notice that is in force under this Law as applying in any participating jurisdiction and the Regulatory Authority is satisfied that— (a) there is a systemic risk in relation to the approved provider or the related provider; and (b) the prohibition notice is reasonably necessary to address the systemic risk.