Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985
36YAllowing use of premises as drug premises—offence by owner or occupier
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 36Y
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985.
36Y Allowing use of premises as drug premises—offence by owner or occupier
36Y Allowing use of premises as drug premises—offence by owner or occupier
(1) A person who is the owner or occupier of any premises and who knowingly allows the premises to be used as drug premises is guilty of an offence.
Maximum penalty—
(a) for a first offence—50 penalty units or imprisonment for 12 months (or both), and
(b) for a second or subsequent offence—500 penalty units or imprisonment for 5 years (or both).
(2) A person who is the owner or occupier of any premises is guilty of an offence if—
(a) the person knowingly allows the premises to be used as drug premises, and
(b) the person knows that a child has access to the premises and, as a consequence of that access, the child is exposed to—
(i) a prohibited drug or prohibited plant, or
(ii) a drug supply process, or
(iii) any equipment capable of being used to administer a prohibited drug.
Maximum penalty—
(a) for a first offence—60 penalty units or imprisonment for 14 months (or both), and
(b) for a second or subsequent offence—600 penalty units or imprisonment for 6 years (or both).
(3) It is a defence to a prosecution for an offence under subsection (2) if the defendant establishes that the exposure of the child to a prohibited drug or prohibited plant, to a drug supply process, or to equipment capable of being used to administer a prohibited drug, did not endanger the health or safety of the child.
(4) If, on the trial of a person for an offence under subsection (2), the jury—
(a) is not satisfied that the person knew a child had access to the premises, or
(b) is not satisfied that a child was exposed to a prohibited drug or prohibited plant, a drug supply process or equipment capable of being used to administer a prohibited drug, or
(c) is satisfied that the defence referred to in subsection (3) has been made out,
the jury may acquit the person of the offence charged and find the person guilty of an offence under subsection (1) and the person is liable to punishment accordingly.