The Act rests on a small set of legal concepts and definitional choices that determine who may contract, who may litigate, what counts as property, and what procedural thresholds apply.

Domestic partner and domestic partnership agreement

• “Domestic partner” is a deliberately broad, partly temporal definition that covers persons in a registered relationship (and those about to enter or who have been in one) and persons who live in a “close personal relationship” (including those about to enter or who have lived in one) (s 3(1)). The Act thus covers both relationships registered under the Relationships Register Act 2016 (explicitly imported, s 3(1) and the Legislative History) and non‑registered close personal relationships.
• “Domestic partnership agreement” means an agreement about division of property on termination or any other financial or related matter (s 3(1)). It must be in writing and signed by each party (s 5).

Certified domestic partnership agreement

• A certified domestic partnership agreement is a domestic partnership agreement that contains a warranty of asset disclosure and where each party’s signature is attested by a lawyer’s certificate, with the lawyers being different persons (s 3(2)). A “lawyer’s certificate” must record that the lawyer explained legal implications to the named party in the lawyer’s absence of the other party, that the party gave apparently credible assurances of no coercion or undue influence, and that the party signed in the lawyer’s presence (s 3(1) definition of “lawyer’s certificate”).

Contractual enforceability and limits on variation

• Domestic partnership agreements are enforceable under contract law (s 6). Except for certified agreements, parties may vary or revoke agreements orally or in writing (s 7(1)-(2)). Certified agreements may only be varied by another certified agreement (s 3(2), s 7(2)).

Court power to set aside or vary

• The court may set aside or vary an agreement if enforcement would cause “serious injustice” (s 8(1)). The court can act of its own motion or on application of either party (s 8(2)). However, the court cannot set aside or vary an agreement if the agreement both excludes the court’s power to set aside or vary and is a certified domestic partnership agreement (s 8(3)).

Property, contributions and factors for division

• “Property” is defined broadly to include prospective superannuation entitlements, discretionary trust interests, property over which a person has a power of disposition, and any other valuable benefit (s 3(1) definition of “property of a person”).
• In making orders, the court must consider direct and indirect financial and non‑financial contributions to acquisition, conservation or improvement of property and to financial resources, contributions including homemaking or parenting, have regard to any relevant domestic partnership agreement and may have regard to other matters (s 11(1)(a)-(d)). If a certified agreement that excludes the court’s power applies, an order must be consistent with that agreement (s 11(2)).

Jurisdictional and temporal thresholds

• Applications are available only if a partner is resident in the State when the application is made, the partners were resident in the State for the whole or a substantial part of the relationship, and the relationship lasted at least three years or there is a child of the partners (s 9(2)). Applications must be made within one year of the end of the relationship unless the court extends that period to avoid serious injustice (s 9(3)). Proceedings commenced by or against a legal personal representative are permitted but limited to undistributed property at the date of the application (s 9(4)-(5)).

Publication, remedies and third‑party rights

• Strict publication restrictions apply to proceedings under the Act with criminal penalties (s 14A). The Act does not exclude other remedies (s 16), and orders cannot prejudice a bona fide purchaser for value without notice (s 15). The court may set aside transactions designed to defeat claims and grant injunctions to prevent such transactions (s 14).

Regulation power and court types

• The Governor may make regulations for the purposes of the Act (s 17). The Act’s definition of court determines venue: Supreme, District, and Magistrates Court for property valued at $100,000 or less (s 3(1) definition of “court”).

Primary persons affected

• Domestic partners as defined by s 3(1). This includes:
  • Persons in a registered relationship and those about to or who have been in a registered relationship (s 3(1)(a)); and
  • Persons who live or have lived in a “close personal relationship” (s 3(1)(b), with the definition of “close personal relationship” in s 3(1)).
• The definition expressly excludes couples who are legally married (s 3(1) “close personal relationship” para (a)). The definition also excludes relationships where one person provides domestic support or personal care for fee or reward or on behalf of an organisation (s 3(1) para (b)).

Legal advisers and certifying lawyers

• Lawyers are functionally implicated: a certified domestic partnership agreement requires lawyer’s certificates from different lawyers and the lawyer’s certificate has a prescribed content (s 3(2) and s 3(1) definition of “lawyer’s certificate”). That creates a role for lawyers in preventing certified agreements from being set aside for coercion or undue influence as the lawyer must attest to private advice and apparent voluntariness.

Courts and tribunal infrastructure

• The Supreme Court, District Court and Magistrates Court (for applications involving $100,000 or less) are the judicial decision‑makers for property division applications (s 3(1) definition of “court”). For small aggregate monetary claims ($6,000 or less) the proceeding is a minor statutory proceeding and will (subject to rules) be handled under Magistrates Court special rules (s 13).

Third parties dealing with property

• Purchasers of property from a domestic partner: s 15 protects a person who acquires in good faith, for value and without notice that the property may be subject to an application. This shields bona fide purchasers from being prejudiced by orders or injunctions under the Act.
• Persons who might be targeted by injunctions or transactions set aside: a court may set aside transactions intended to defeat orders and grant injunctions to prevent such transactions (s 14). Those engaging in asset transfers following or anticipating separation will be affected.

Estate trustees and legal personal representatives

• Applications may be made by or against the legal personal representative of a deceased domestic partner (s 9(4)); but if against a representative, only undistributed property is catchable (s 9(5)).

Media, publishers and commentators

• Any person or entity that might publish reports that identify a party, witness or associated person in proceedings under the Act is affected by s 14A. The restriction is broad, the penalty significant ($10,000 or two years imprisonment), and the offence is indictable with DPP consent required to commence proceedings (s 14A(1), (3)-(4)).

Regulatory and disciplinary bodies

• Selected communications to disciplinary bodies, legal aid bodies, courts under direction, and professional or student audiences are expressly permitted (s 14A(2)(a)-(g)). This affects how legal and professional regulators interact with court documents and disclosures.

Who bears costs and compliance burdens

• Parties seeking certified agreements must pay for two lawyers’ certificates and meet the asset disclosure warranty in the agreement (s 3(2)). Parties bringing court applications will ordinarily bear litigation costs and must meet residency and temporal thresholds (s 9(2)-(3)). Publishers and media entities bear the compliance risk of s 14A.

Express contractual rights and duties

• Right to contract: domestic partners may make a domestic partnership agreement about property division and related matters (s 5(1)). Duty to produce formalities: such an agreement must be in writing and signed by each party (s 5(2)). Enforceability: agreements are subject to and enforceable under the law of contract (s 6).

Certified agreement duties and effect

• For an agreement to be certified it must contain an asset disclosure warranty and have each party’s signature attested by a lawyer’s certificate, with each certificate by a different lawyer (s 3(2)). The lawyer’s certificate must indicate that the lawyer explained the legal implications in the absence of the other party, that the party appeared not to be under coercion (apparently credible assurances), and that the party signed in the lawyer’s presence (s 3(1) definition of “lawyer’s certificate”). Certified agreements can be drafted to exclude the court’s power to set aside or vary, and where they do and the agreement is certified, the court is precluded from setting aside or varying (s 8(3), s 11(2)).

Variation and revocation

• Non‑certified agreements may be varied or revoked orally or in writing (s 7(1)). Certified agreements may only be varied by another certified domestic partnership agreement (s 7(2)). These rules create a difference in contractual malleability and evidentiary certainty between certified and uncertified agreements.

Right to court adjustment and court duties

• Right to apply: after the domestic partnership ends, either partner may apply to a court for division of property (s 9(1)). Jurisdictional conditions apply: residency, residence during the relationship, and either a minimum three‑year relationship duration or the existence of a child (s 9(2)). Limitation: one year from the end of the relationship unless the court extends to avoid serious injustice (s 9(3)).
• Court duties: the court must consider direct and indirect financial and non‑financial contributions, homemaking and parenting contributions, the terms of any relevant domestic partnership agreement, and may consider other relevant matters (s 11(1)). The court also has a duty to finally resolve questions about division of property “as far as practicable” and avoid further proceedings between the partners (s 12).

Powers of the court

• The court may make such orders as it considers necessary to divide property justly and equitably, including transfer, sale and division of net proceeds and lump sum payments (s 10(1)-(2)). The court may set aside or vary agreements to avoid serious injustice (s 8(1)-(3)). The court may set aside transactions that defeat or have the effect of defeating an order or anticipated order and may grant injunctions to restrain such transactions (s 14(1)-(2)). In exercising s 14 powers the court must have regard to all interests in the property (s 14(3)).

Publication and disclosure duties

• A person must not publish reports of proceedings that identify parties, witnesses or associated persons, or a list of proceedings identified by parties’ names (s 14A(1)). There are express exceptions for communications among persons concerned in proceedings, communications to disciplinary bodies, legal aid bodies and certain authorised publications and professionals (s 14A(2)). The Act places a duty on anyone dealing with such material to ensure they fall within an exception to avoid criminal liability (s 14A(1)-(2)).

Protections for third parties

• Orders or injunctions under the Act cannot prejudice the interests of a person who acquires property in good faith, for value and without notice that property may be the subject of an application under the Act (s 15). This is a protective rule for innocent third parties dealing in property markets.

Regulatory power

• The Governor may make regulations to implement the Act (s 17). That power can be used to prescribe procedural or substantive details peripheral to the Act, subject to ordinary statutory limits.

Criminal penalties for publication

• The Act imposes a criminal penalty for publication of identifying reports about proceedings under the Act. Section 14A(1) creates the principal offence, with a maximum penalty of $10,000 or imprisonment for two years. Subsection 14A(3) declares that an offence against the section is an indictable offence, and subsection 14A(4) provides that proceedings for an offence must not be commenced except by, or with the written consent of, the Director of Public Prosecutions. The combination of a custodial maximum, indictable status and DPP gatekeeping centralises prosecutorial discretion.

Court orders and equitable relief

• Enforcement of property adjustment primarily relies on civil court processes. The court may order transfer or sale of property, or payment of lump sums (s 10(1)-(2)), and may give consequential directions when setting aside transactions intended to defeat orders (s 14(1)). The Act expressly empowers injunctions to restrain imminent transactions that might defeat an order (s 14(2)). These are civil enforcement mechanisms enforced by normal contempt and enforcement processes available to courts.

Setting aside transactions and consequential orders

• Section 14(1) permits the court to set aside transactions entered into to defeat, or having the effect of defeating, an order or anticipated order for division of property. The court may give consequential orders and directions; s 14(3) requires the court to have regard to all interests in the property when exercising these powers. This gives courts the ability to reverse or modify dispositions of assets that would frustrate a just and equitable division.

Interaction with third‑party rights

• Section 15 operates as an enforceability limit: an order or injunction cannot prejudice the interests of a person who acquires an interest in property in good faith, for value and without notice. Practically, this protects bona fide purchasers and limits the reach of enforcement against property already transferred to innocent third parties.

Limits on judicial intervention

• The court’s power to set aside or vary agreements is tied to the statutory test of “serious injustice” (s 8(1)). Moreover, where a certified domestic partnership agreement both excludes the court’s power to set aside or vary and meets the certification formalities, s 8(3) bars the court from setting aside or varying. Section 11(2) obliges the court to ensure any property order is consistent with such an agreement. These rules constrain judicial discretion in the face of compliant certified agreements.

Procedural enforcement features

• The courts specified by s 3 (Supreme, District, Magistrates for ≤$100,000) will apply their usual enforcement, costs, and contempt powers to enforce orders under the Act. For small claims ($6,000 or less aggregate) the matter is a minor statutory proceeding and is to be managed under the Magistrates Court Act 1991 special rules (s 13 and the Note).

Regulatory enforcement

• Regulations may be made by the Governor for the purposes of the Act (s 17). Any regulatory scheme made under that power could create additional enforcement obligations or procedural stipulations, though none are specified in the text provided.

Explicit cross‑references and imported concepts

• Registered relationships: the Act imports the concept of a “registered relationship” from the Relationships Register Act 2016 by definition (s 3(1) definition of “registered relationship”). The Legislative History shows amendments tied to that Act (Relationships Register Act 2016, Sch 1 cl 3, commencement 1.8.2017).
• Magistrates Court procedures: the small claims provision references the Magistrates Court Act 1991 for the definition and special rules relating to minor statutory proceedings (s 13 and Note). This ties case management and rules for low‑value disputes to that Act.

Contract law and legal professional regulation

• Domestic partnership agreements are expressly enforceable under the law of contract (s 6). Consequently, the ordinary body of contract doctrine (formation, misrepresentation, duress, undue influence, unconscionability, rectification, estoppel, etc.) will be relevant to disputes over agreement validity and enforcement, subject to the Act’s specific rules on certification and variation (ss 3, 7-8, 11(2)).

Probate and succession interaction

• Proceedings may be brought by or against legal personal representatives where a partner dies (s 9(4)). An application against a legal personal representative is limited to property undistributed at the date of application (s 9(5)). This creates an intersection with estate administration law and the duties of personal representatives to distribute assets, as orders under the Act can affect undistributed estate assets.

Evidence and legal aid interactions

• Section 14A(2)(c) permits communication of pleadings or transcripts to a body that grants legal aid for facilitating decisions about legal aid. Section 14A(2)(a) and (b) permit specified communications to courts, tribunals and disciplinary bodies. These carve outs show how confidentiality interacts with existing administrative and disciplinary processes.

Criminal law: publication offence

• The publication prohibition (s 14A) creates a new criminal offence (indictable) with DPP consent required (s 14A(3)-(4)), which intersects with ordinary criminal procedure and prosecutorial discretion under the DPP.

Statutory non‑exclusivity and other remedies

• The Act expressly states it does not exclude other forms of remedy or relief (s 16). This preserves the operation of other statutory or common law remedies; for example, fraud actions, equitable claims, or other statutory family law rights not specified in the Act may remain available.

Regulation‑making power

• The Governor may make regulations for the purposes of the Act (s 17). Regulations under this Act would sit in the hierarchy below the Act and must be interpreted in light of the Act’s text, affecting procedural or administrative aspects, though no specific regulations are enumerated in the text provided.

Amendment history and savings

• The Legislative History indicates multiple amendments and renamings (De Facto Relationships Act 1996 to Domestic Partners Property Act 1996) and transitional provisions that preserve earlier proceedings or treat old terms as new (Transitional provisions: Statutes Amendment (Courts and Judicial Administration) Act 2001 s 11; Statutes Amendment (Domestic Partners) Act 2006 s 86; Statutes Amendment (Courts Efficiency Reforms) Act 2012 s 19). Those transitional clauses interact with litigation timing and interpretation of older agreements.

The Act has been amended multiple times since its original enactment in 1996 and has been retitled and conceptually reworked. The information in the Legislative History section of the text is the specific record provided by the statute and sets out enactments, amendment instruments, assent dates and commencements. Key mechanical points from the Legislative History are:

Original enactment and title

• The Act originally came into operation as the De Facto Relationships Act 1996 and commenced 16 December 1996 (Gazette reference provided) following assent on 1 August 1996 (1996 No 51).

Major amendment instruments and dates (as recorded)

• Statutes Amendment (Courts and Judicial Administration) Act 2001 (No 69 of 2001), assent 6 December 2001, with Part 5 (ss 9-11) commencing 3 February 2002 (Gazette reference). The Legislative History notes a transitional provision (s 11 of that amending Act) preserving proceedings commenced before the commencement as unaffected by the amendment.
• Statutes Amendment (Courts) Act 2004 (No 23 of 2004), assent 8 July 2004, with Pt 4 (s 7) commencing 1 September 2004.
• Statutes Amendment (Domestic Partners) Act 2006 (No 43 of 2006), assent 14 December 2006, with Pt 26 (ss 72-86) commencing 1 June 2007. That amending Act effectuated extensive reworking of Part 1 definitions, including insertion of “domestic partner”, “domestic partnership agreement”, and the certified agreement regime,many provisions were substituted, inserted or redesignated by s 74-86 of that amending Act. A transitional provision (s 86 of the amending Act) provides that references to cohabitation agreement or certificated agreement will be taken to be references to domestic partnership agreement or certified domestic partnership agreement where the context admits.
• Statute Law Revision Act 2008 (No 9 of 2008), assent 17 April 2008, commenced 17 April 2008, making technical revisions noted in the Variation list.
• Statutes Amendment (Courts Efficiency Reforms) Act 2012 (No 43 of 2012), assent 22 November 2012, with relevant parts commencing 1 July 2013, and a transitional provision (s 19) preserving proceedings commenced before the amendments.
• Relationships Register Act 2016 (No 67 of 2016), assent 15 December 2016, with Schedule 1 cl 3 commencing 1 August 2017, which resulted in amendments to definitions (registered relationship) and related provisions.

Provision‑level amendments (examples from the table)

• The definition of “certified domestic partnership agreement” was inserted by the 2006 amending Act (43/2006 s 74(1)), replacing an earlier “certificated agreement” term which was deleted (1.6.2007). The 2006 amendments also reworked the definitions of “child”, inserted “close personal relationship”, substituted “domestic partner” for earlier “de facto partner”, and inserted the domestic partnership agreement concept (various s 74 subsections).
• Section 4 was substituted in full by the 2006 amending Act (s 75) to change the application and transitional scope.
• Sections 9-12 and other Parts were amended, substituted or reworded at various times to update jurisdictional tests, court powers and to reflect judicial administration reforms (notably in 2001, 2006, 2012).

Transitional provisions

• The Legislative History contains explicit transitional clauses that ensure prior proceedings are treated consistently. For example, the 2001 and 2012 courts reform Acts specify that their amendments do not apply to proceedings already commenced before the respective commencements, but do apply to proceedings commenced after (2001 s 11; 2012 s 19). The 2006 amendment contains a provision treating older term references as references to the new term where context allows (s 86).

Publication of amendment history

• The Act’s Legislative History tabulates amendments and their commencement dates and records that earlier versions and reprints are available (Reprints: 3.2.2002; 1.9.2004; 1.6.2007; 17.4.2008; 1.7.2013). The table also indicates which provisions were amended by which instrument and when each amendment commenced, which is relevant when interpreting proceedings begun around amendment dates.

Operational effect of amendments

• The 2006 amendments in particular materially changed definitions and the certification regime, embedding lawyer involvement and asset disclosure warranties, and making certified agreements more resistant to court variation. The 2016 amendment integrates registered relationships under the Relationships Register Act 2016 into the Act’s scope. The 2001 and 2012 amendments adjusted court procedure and thresholds.

Readers should consult the specific amending Acts and the noted reprints for the exact text as it applied at any given historical moment; the Legislative History here identifies which instruments altered which provisions and the commencement dates that govern transitional application.

The statutory text supplied does not include annotated case law or a list of reported decisions applying the Domestic Partners Property Act 1996. The Legislative History and the body of the Act itself contain no case citations, judicial summaries or references to precedent. Accordingly, this document does not provide specific judicial interpretations or reported decisions.

What the Act’s text discloses about litigation patterns and contours (based on statutory design)

• The Act creates litigation opportunities primarily in relation to:
  • Enforcement and interpretation of domestic partnership agreements, including challenges based on the “serious injustice” standard (s 8) and the effect of certified agreements that exclude judicial variation (s 8(3), s 11(2)).
  • Applications for division of property under Pt 3, including valuation, classification of property (notably broad inclusion of superannuation and discretionary trust interests, s 3(1) definitions), and assessment of financial and non‑financial contributions (s 11(1)).
  • Applications concerning alleged transactions intended to defeat orders or anticipated orders, where courts may set aside transactions and grant injunctions (s 14).
  • Proceedings about whether an applicant meets the jurisdictional thresholds of residency, relationship duration, or child of the domestic partners (s 9(2)).
  • Proceedings raising publication issues under s 14A if material identifying parties is published, noting the indictable nature of the offence and DPP consent requirement (s 14A(1), (3)-(4)).

Potential litigation themes arising from statutory text

• Evidentiary and certification disputes: whether the lawyer’s certificate met the statutory requirements (s 3(1) definition) could be litigated when parties dispute voluntariness or disclosure.
• Property characterisation disputes: the Act’s expansive definition of “property” (s 3(1)) invites litigation over whether specific entitlements fall within that scope (for example, discretionary trust benefits or prospective superannuation entitlements).
• Time‑bar disputes: whether an application falls within the one‑year limit or whether an extension to avoid serious injustice is warranted (s 9(3)).
• Third‑party rights versus set‑aside orders: litigation may address whether a purchaser acquired in good faith, for value and without notice (s 15), and whether a transaction was entered into to defeat an anticipated order (s 14).

Absence of reported cases in the supplied text

• The supplied Act text and Legislative History do not identify or summarise case law applying the Act. For an up‑to‑date litigation history and precedent analysis, practitioners must consult case law databases and court archives to identify reported decisions that interpret s 8’s “serious injustice” test, the certification formalities, s 11’s contribution assessments, and s 14’s transaction‑setting‑aside and injunctive powers.

Rules that commonly surprise practitioners and parties, drawn from the statute’s mechanics and wording:

Certified agreements are legally potent and hard to vary

• A certified domestic partnership agreement requires an explicit asset disclosure warranty and lawyer’s certificates from different lawyers (s 3(2)). Where a certified agreement both provides for exclusion of the court’s power to set aside or vary and meets certification requirements, the court is barred from setting it aside or varying it (s 8(3)). Orders for division must be consistent with such agreements (s 11(2)). The consequence is that parties may bind themselves to terms that are insulated from judicial interference, provided the certification formalities are strictly observed.

Variation formalities differ for certified versus non‑certified agreements

• Non‑certified agreements may be varied or revoked orally or in writing (s 7(1)), but certified agreements may only be varied by another certified domestic partnership agreement (s 7(2)). Oral variation of a certified agreement will not be effective to vary the certified agreement if the statutory requirements are not met; that creates evidentiary and substantive risk for parties attempting informal changes.

Asset disclosure warranty requirement

• A certified agreement must include a “warranty of asset disclosure” (s 3(2)(a)). The Act does not prescribe the form or scope of the disclosure beyond requiring the warranty be included, but the warranty attaches legal significance: a certified agreement that lacks actual disclosure may be vulnerable to challenge, and parties relying on certification should ensure the warranty is accurate and comprehensively supported by documentation.

One‑year limitation with a narrow extension test

• Applications for division of property must be made within one year after the end of the domestic relationship unless the court, after considering the interests of both partners, finds that extending the limitation is necessary to avoid serious injustice to the applicant (s 9(3)). Practically, delay risks forfeiture unless a serious injustice threshold is satisfied; the Act centralises the court’s balancing of both partners’ interests in that decision.

Residential and duration jurisdictional tests

• The court’s jurisdiction requires residency when the application is made and residency for the whole or a substantial part of the relationship, plus either a three‑year relationship duration or a child (s 9(2)). Parties who separated after short partnerships without children or whose residency is weak may be excluded from remedy.

Magistrates Court monetary threshold and minor statutory proceeding status

• The definition of “court” allows the Magistrates Court to hear matters where the property value is $100,000 or less (s 3(1)). Section 13 makes matters with aggregate claimed amounts of $6,000 or less minor statutory proceedings and subject to the Magistrates Court Act 1991 special rules. Aggregation is required: monetary amounts and values of interests must be aggregated (s 13(2)), which may push a case into the higher track unexpectedly.

Publication restriction is broad and criminal

• Section 14A(1) forbids publication that identifies or could tend to identify parties, witnesses or associated persons in proceedings under the Act. The offence is indictable, attracts a significant maximum penalty and requires DPP consent to commence prosecution (s 14A(1), (3)-(4)). Media or legal commentators must carefully assess permitted exceptions under s 14A(2) before publishing.

Transactions to defeat claims can be set aside

• Transactions entered into to defeat, or that have the effect of defeating, an order or anticipated order can be set aside (s 14(1)), and injunctions can be granted to prevent such transactions (s 14(2)). Parties moving assets after separation may therefore be exposed to reversal even if formal title has transferred, subject to s 15’s protection for bona fide purchasers without notice.

Third‑party purchaser protection narrowness

• Section 15 protects purchasers who acquire in good faith, for value and without notice. Those who take with knowledge of an application or with constructive notice may not be protected. The Act does not define “notice”; market participants should understand the evidentiary burden in disputes over notice.

Certified agreement lawyer’s certificate content creates evidentiary expectations

• The lawyer must certify that advice was given in the absence of the other party and that the party gave apparently credible assurances of no coercion (s 3(1) definition). If a party later alleges coercion or lack of independent advice, the factual sufficiency of the lawyer’s certificate becomes a focal point of litigation.

Estate timing and undistributed property limit

• Applications against legal personal representatives after death are limited to undistributed property at the date of application (s 9(5)). Once property has been validly distributed under an estate, the reach of the Act against the estate’s beneficiaries is curtailed.

Non‑exclusivity of remedies complicates strategy

• The Act expressly does not exclude other remedies or relief (s 16). Plaintiffs or defendants may therefore deploy parallel or alternative causes of action outside the statutory scheme, complicating settlement and litigation strategy.

Regulatory and prosecutorial discretion in publication offences

• DPP consent is necessary to commence proceedings for s 14A offences (s 14A(4)), centralising prosecutorial power and potentially making the prospect of publication enforcement contingent on policy priorities or resource allocation.

Practical steps for domestic partners, lawyers, purchasers and publishers to comply with statutory obligations and manage risks:

Before entering an agreement

• Consider certification if finality is desired: to create a certified domestic partnership agreement the parties must include an asset disclosure warranty and each signatory’s signature must be attested by a lawyer’s certificate, with each certificate given by a different lawyer (s 3(2)). Ensure the agreement explicitly states whether the parties intend to exclude the court’s power to set aside or vary (and if so ensure the certification formalities are strictly complied with) because such an exclusion will bar judicial variation where the agreement is certified (s 8(3), s 11(2)).

Drafting certified agreements

• Include a clear warranty of full asset disclosure in the agreement text (s 3(2)(a)). Obtain separate lawyer’s certificates that comply with the statutory content: each lawyer must certify that they explained the legal implications to the named party in the lawyer’s absence of the other party, that the party gave apparently credible assurances of not being under coercion or undue influence, and that the party signed the agreement in the lawyer’s presence (s 3(1) definition). Use two different lawyers to meet s 3(2)(b)(ii).

Handling variations and revocations

• For uncertified agreements: variation or revocation may be oral or written (s 7(1)). However, oral variations are often hard to prove; best practice is to record variations in writing and have them signed.
• For certified agreements: only a further certified domestic partnership agreement can vary the existing certified agreement (s 7(2)). If parties intend future flexibility, avoid drafting an exclusion of court power into a certified agreement or provide processes for certified variation.

Complying with property application jurisdictional tests

• If contemplating court application for property division, ensure residency at the time of application and substantiation that the partners were resident in South Australia for the whole or a substantial part of the relationship (s 9(2)(a)-(b)). Confirm that the relationship lasted at least three years or there is a child of the partners (s 9(2)(c)). Note the one‑year limitation from the relationship’s end and apply for extension early if there is a risk of missing the statutory time bar; an extension requires the court to be satisfied that it is necessary to avoid serious injustice to the applicant (s 9(3)).

Preserving and evidencing contributions and property

• Gather documentation supporting financial and non‑financial contributions, including records of acquisition, conservation, improvement, mortgage and asset titles, superannuation statements, trust documents for discretionary trusts, and contemporaneous records of homemaking or parenting contributions. The court must consider these matters when dividing property (s 11(1)(a)-(b)), so accumulation of evidence on both financial and non‑financial contributions is important.

Managing transactions after separation

• Avoid transfers or dispositions that could be characterised as attempts to defeat an anticipated property order. The court can set aside such transactions and grant injunctions (s 14(1)-(2)). If a transfer is necessary, document commercial reasons, obtain independent valuations and consider securing purchaser protections by ensuring the transferee is acting in good faith for value and without notice (s 15).

Dealing with superannuation and trusts

• Treat prospective entitlements (superannuation) and potential discretionary trust benefits as property for purposes of the Act (s 3(1) definitions). Obtain legal advice on valuation and on whether the entitlement is appropriately characterised as property within the meaning of the Act.

For legal practitioners advising clients

• Ensure lawyer’s certificates meet s 3(1) content when certifying a party’s signature for a certified agreement. Keep contemporaneous records demonstrating the advice given and the apparent voluntariness of the client to withstand future challenges.
• Advise clients about the binding effect of certified agreements that exclude judicial variation (s 8(3), s 11(2)). Where settlement finality is desired but risk of later hardship exists, counsel clients on wariness before signing such exclusions.
• For applications to court, prepare to demonstrate residency and duration thresholds and to justify extension of the one‑year limitation on grounds of avoiding serious injustice (s 9(2)-(3)).

For publishers and media entities

• Treat proceedings under the Act as subject to strict non‑publication rules (s 14A). Before publishing any identifying information about parties, witnesses or associated persons, apply the statutory exceptions in s 14A(2). Where in doubt, obtain legal advice and consider anonymising reporting or seeking court directions, as the offence is indictable and requires DPP consent to prosecute (s 14A(1), (3)-(4)).

For purchasers and title transferees

• If acquiring property from a domestic partner near a separation event, conduct robust due diligence for any pending applications and seek warranties and indemnities. Section 15 protects purchasers acting in good faith, for value and without notice, so documenting absence of notice and consideration paid can be critical.

For executors and personal representatives

• If facing an application under s 9(4)-(5), determine whether the estate has undistributed assets at the application date because an application against a legal personal representative may only relate to undistributed property (s 9(5)). Coordinate estate administration with potential domestic partner claims.

Regulatory compliance

• Monitor whether the Governor has made regulations under s 17 that impose procedural obligations, forms, timeframes or fees. Although none are set out in the supplied text, practitioners should check the current regulations where the Act is applied.

General procedural best practice

• When in doubt, obtain independent legal advice, use written records for agreements and variations, and act early on preservation of evidence, valuation and notification to avoid evidentiary or jurisdictional pitfalls embedded in the Act.