NTIn ForceAct
Defamation Act 2006
1Defamation Act 2006
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 1
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Defamation Act 2006.
NORTHERN TERRITORY OF AUSTRALIA
DEFAMATION ACT 2006
As in force at 11 August 2025
Table of provisions
Part 1 Preliminary matters
1 Short title ......................................................................................... 1
2 Objects of Act .................................................................................. 1
3 Definitions ........................................................................................ 1
4 Act binds Crown .............................................................................. 5
Part 2 General principles
Division 1 Defamation and the general law
5 Tort of defamation ........................................................................... 5
6 Distinction between slander and libel abolished .............................. 5
Division 2 Causes of action for defamation
7 Single cause of action for multiple defamatory imputations in
same matter..................................................................................... 6
8 Certain corporations do not have cause of action for
defamation ....................................................................................... 6
9 No cause of action for defamation of, or against, deceased
persons ............................................................................................ 7
9A Serious harm element of cause of action for defamation ................. 7
Division 2A Exemptions from liability for digital
intermediaries
9B Definitions ........................................................................................ 8
9C Exemption for digital intermediaries providing caching, conduit
or storage services .......................................................................... 9
9D Exemption for search engine providers ......................................... 10
9E Early determination of digital intermediary exemptions ................. 11
Division 3 Choice of law
10 Choice of law for defamation proceedings ..................................... 12
Defamation Act 2006 ii
Part 3 Resolution of civil disputes without
litigation
Division 1 Concerns notices and offers to make amends
11 Application of Division ................................................................... 13
11A Concerns notices ........................................................................... 14
11B Defamation proceedings cannot be commenced without
concerns notice ............................................................................. 15
12 Publisher may make offer to make amends................................... 16
13 When offer to make amends may be made ................................... 16
14 Content of offer to make amends .................................................. 17
15 Withdrawal of offer to make amends ............................................. 18
16 Effect of acceptance of offer to make amends............................... 19
17 Effect of failure to accept reasonable offer to make amends ......... 20
18 Inadmissibility of evidence of certain statements and
admissions..................................................................................... 21
Division 2 Apologies
19 Effect of apology on liability for defamation ................................... 21
Part 4 Litigation of civil disputes
Division 1 General
20 Leave required for multiple proceedings in relation to
publication of same defamatory matter.......................................... 22
20A Orders for preliminary discovery about posters of digital matter .... 22
Division 2 Defences
21 Scope of defences under general law and other law not limited .... 23
22 Defence of justification .................................................................. 23
23 Defence of contextual truth ............................................................ 24
24 Defence of absolute privilege ........................................................ 24
25 Defence for publication of public documents ................................. 25
26 Defences of fair report of proceedings of public concern ............... 27
26A Defence of publication of matter concerning issue of public
interest ........................................................................................... 31
27 Defence of qualified privilege for provision of certain
information ..................................................................................... 32
27A Defence of scientific or academic peer review............................... 33
28 Defences of honest opinion ........................................................... 34
28A Defence for publications involving digital intermediaries ............... 36
29 Defence of innocent dissemination ................................................ 38
Defamation Act 2006 iii
Division 3 Remedies
31 Damages to bear rational relationship to harm .............................. 39
32 Damages for non-economic loss limited ........................................ 39
33 State of mind of defendant generally not relevant to awarding
damages ........................................................................................ 40
34 Exemplary or punitive damages cannot be awarded ..................... 40
35 Factors in mitigation of damages ................................................... 40
36 Damages for multiple causes of action may be assessed as
single sum ..................................................................................... 41
36A Orders against non-party digital intermediaries concerning
defamatory digital matter ............................................................... 41
Division 4 Costs
37 Costs in defamation proceedings .................................................. 42
Part 5 Miscellaneous matters
38 Proof of publication ........................................................................ 43
39 Proof of convictions for offences.................................................... 44
40 Incriminating answers, documents or things .................................. 44
41 Giving of notices and other documents ......................................... 45
42 Regulations.................................................................................... 46
Part 6 Repeals and transitional matters for
Defamation Act 2006
43 Definitions ...................................................................................... 46
44 Repeal ........................................................................................... 46
45 Application of this Act .................................................................... 46
46 References to repealed Act ........................................................... 47
Part 7 Transitional matters for Defamation
Legislation Amendment Act 2025
Division 1 Part 2 of Defamation Legislation Amendment
Act 2025
47 Application of amendments ........................................................... 47
Division 2 Part 3, Division 2 of Defamation Legislation
Amendment Act 2025
48 Interpretation ................................................................................. 48
49 Application of digital intermediary amendments ............................ 48
50 Application of offers amendments ................................................. 49
51 Application of preliminary discovery or non-party digital
intermediary order amendments .................................................... 49
Defamation Act 2006 iv
52 Application of document giving or service amendments ................ 49
Division 3 Part 3, Division 3 of Defamation Legislation
Amendment Act 2025
53 Application of absolute privilege amendments............................... 49
Schedule 1 Additional publications to which absolute
privilege applies
Schedule 2 Additional kinds of public documents
Schedule 3 Additional proceedings of public concern
Schedule 4 Acts repealed
ENDNOTES
NORTHERN TERRITORY OF AUSTRALIA
____________________
As in force at 11 August 2025
____________________
DEFAMATION ACT 2006
An Act to enact in the Territory provisions to promote uniform laws of
defamation in Australia, and for related purposes
Part 1 Preliminary matters
1 Short title
This Act may be cited as the Defamation Act 2006.
2 Objects of Act
The objects of this Act are:
(a) to enact provisions to promote uniform laws of defamation in
Australia; and
(b) to ensure the law of defamation does not place unreasonable
limits on freedom of expression and, in particular, on the
publication and discussion of matters of public interest and
importance; and
(c) to provide effective and fair remedies for persons whose
reputations are harmed by the publication of defamatory
matter; and
(d) to promote speedy and non-litigious methods of resolving
disputes about the publication of defamatory matter.
3 Definitions
In this Act:
access prevention step, in relation to the publication of digital
matter, means a step:
(a) to remove the matter; or
(b) to block, disable or otherwise prevent access, whether by
some or all persons, to the matter.
Part 1 Preliminary matters
Defamation Act 2006 2
aggrieved person, for Part 3, Division 1, has the meaning in
section 11(1).
applicable period, for an offer to make amends, see section 13.
associated entity, see section 50AAA of the Corporations
Act 2001 (Cth).
Australian court means any court established by or under a law of
an Australian jurisdiction (including a court conducting committal
proceedings for an indictable offence).
Australian jurisdiction means:
(a) a State; or
(b) a Territory; or
(c) the Commonwealth.
Australian tribunal means any tribunal (other than a court)
established by or under a law of an Australian jurisdiction that has
the power to take evidence from witnesses before it on oath or
affirmation (including a Royal Commission or other special
commission of inquiry).
caching service, for Part 2, Division 2A, see section 9B.
concerns notice, see section 11A.
conduit service, for Part 2, Division 2A, see section 9B.
country includes:
(a) a federation and a state, territory, province or other part of a
federation; and
(b) an Australian jurisdiction.
digital intermediary, in relation to the publication of digital matter,
means a person, other than an author, originator or poster of the
matter, who provides or administers the online service by means of
which the matter is published.
Note for definition digital intermediary
There may be more than one digital intermediary in relation to the publication of
the same digital matter.
digital matter means matter published in electronic form by means
of an online service.
Part 1 Preliminary matters
Defamation Act 2006 3
document means any record of information, and includes:
(a) anything on which there is writing; and
(b) anything on which there are marks, figures, symbols or
perforations having a meaning for persons qualified to
interpret them; and
(c) anything from which sounds, images or writings can be
reproduced with or without the aid of anything else; and
(d) a map, plan, drawing or photograph.
electronic communication includes a communication of
information in the form of data, text, images or sound (or any
combination of these) by means of guided or unguided
electromagnetic energy, or both.
excluded corporation, see section 8.
further particulars notice, see section 11A(3).
general law means the common law and equity.
matter includes:
(a) an article, report, advertisement or other thing communicated
by means of a newspaper, magazine or other periodical; and
(b) a program, report, advertisement or other thing communicated
by means of television, radio, the Internet or any other form of
electronic communication; and
(c) a letter, note or other writing; and
(d) a picture, gesture or oral utterance; and
(e) any other thing by means of which something may be
communicated to a person.
matter in question, for Part 3, Division 1, has the meaning in
section 11(1).
offer to make amends means an offer to make amends under
Part 3, Division 1.
Part 1 Preliminary matters
Defamation Act 2006 4
online service means a service provided to a person, whether or
not it is requested or it is for a fee or reward, to enable the person
to use the internet, including, without limitation, a service enabling a
person:
(a) to access or connect to the internet; or
(b) to use the internet to do one or more of the following:
(i) send or receive content;
(ii) store content;
(iii) index content;
(iv) search for content;
(v) share content;
(vi) interact with other persons.
Examples for definition online service
1 An internet-based social media platform.
2 A forum created or administered by a person using a facility provided by an
internet-based social media platform that enables users to share content or
interact with other users about a topic.
3 A website or other internet-based platform that enables knowledge to be
shared by or with its users.
parliamentary body means:
(a) a parliament or legislature of any country; or
(b) a house of a parliament or legislature of any country; or
(c) a committee of a parliament or legislature of any country; or
(d) a committee of a house or houses of a parliament or
legislature of any country.
poster, in relation to the publication of digital matter, means a
person who uses the online service by means of which the matter is
published for the purpose of communicating the matter to one or
more other persons.
search engine, for Part 2, Division 2A, see section 9B.
search engine provider, for Part 2, Division 2A, see section 9B.
search result, for Part 2, Division 2A, see section 9B.
Part 2 General principles
Division 1 Defamation and the general law
Defamation Act 2006 5
storage service, for Part 2, Division 2A, see section 9B.
publisher, for Part 3, Division 1, has the meaning in section 11(1).
substantially true means true in substance or not materially
different from the truth.
Territory means the Australian Capital Territory or Northern
Territory.
this jurisdiction means the Northern Territory.
4 Act binds Crown
This Act binds the Crown in right of this jurisdiction and, to the
extent the legislative power of the Legislative Assembly permits, the
Crown in all its other capacities.
Part 2 General principles
Division 1 Defamation and the general law
5 Tort of defamation
(1) This Act relates to the tort of defamation at general law.
(2) This Act does not affect the operation of the general law in relation
to the tort of defamation except to the extent that this Act provides
otherwise (whether expressly or by necessary implication).
(3) Without limiting subsection (2), the general law as it is from time to
time applies for the purposes of this Act as if the Acts repealed by
section 44 had never been enacted.
6 Distinction between slander and libel abolished
(1) The distinction at general law between slander and libel remains
abolished.
(2) Accordingly, the publication of defamatory matter of any kind is
actionable without proof of special damage.
Part 2 General principles
Division 2 Causes of action for defamation
Defamation Act 2006 6
Division 2 Causes of action for defamation
7 Single cause of action for multiple defamatory imputations in
same matter
A person has a single cause of action for defamation in relation to
the publication of defamatory matter about the person even if more
than one defamatory imputation about the person is carried by the
matter.
8 Certain corporations do not have cause of action for
defamation
(1) A corporation has no cause of action for defamation in relation to
the publication of defamatory matter about the corporation unless it
was an excluded corporation at the time of the publication.
(2) A corporation is an excluded corporation if:
(a) the objects for which it is formed do not include obtaining
financial gain for its members or corporators; or
(b) it has fewer than 10 employees and is not an associated entity
of another corporation;
and the corporation is not a public body.
(3) In counting employees for the purposes of subsection (2)(b), part-
time employees are to be taken into account as an appropriate
fraction of a full-time equivalent.
(5) Subsection (1) does not affect any cause of action for defamation
that an individual associated with a corporation has in relation to the
publication of defamatory matter about the individual even if the
publication of the same matter also defames the corporation.
(6) In this section:
corporation includes any body corporate or corporation constituted
by or under a law of any country (including by exercise of a
prerogative right), whether or not a public body.
employee, in relation to a corporation, includes any individual
(whether or not an independent contractor) who is:
(a) engaged in the day-to-day operations of the corporation other
than as a volunteer; and
(b) subject to the control and direction of the corporation.
Part 2 General principles
Division 2 Causes of action for defamation
Defamation Act 2006 7
public body means a local government body or other
governmental or public authority constituted by or under a law of
any country.
9 No cause of action for defamation of, or against, deceased
persons
(1) A person (including a personal representative of a deceased
person) cannot assert, continue or enforce a cause of action for
defamation in relation to:
(a) the publication of defamatory matter about a deceased person
(whether published before or after his or her death); or
(b) the publication of defamatory matter by a person who has died
since publishing the matter.
(2) Subsection (1) does not prevent a court, if it considers it in the
interests of justice to do so, from determining the question of costs
for proceedings discontinued because of that subsection.
9A Serious harm element of cause of action for defamation
(1) It is an element (the serious harm element) of a cause of action
for defamation that the publication of defamatory matter about a
person has caused, or is likely to cause, serious harm to the
reputation of the person.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), harm to the reputation of an
excluded corporation is not serious harm unless it has caused, or is
likely to cause, the corporation serious financial loss.
(3) The judicial officer in defamation proceedings is to determine
whether the serious harm element is established.
(4) Without limiting subsection (3), the judicial officer may (whether on
the application of a party or on the judicial officer's own motion):
(a) determine whether the serious harm element is established at
any time before the trial for the proceedings commences or
during the trial; and
(b) make any orders the judicial officer considers appropriate
concerning the determination of the issue (including
dismissing the proceedings if satisfied the element is not
established).
(5) If a party applies for the serious harm element to be determined
before the trial for the proceedings commences, the judicial officer
is to determine the issue as soon as practicable before the trial
Part 2 General principles
Division 2A Exemptions from liability for digital intermediaries
Defamation Act 2006 8
commences unless satisfied that there are special circumstances
justifying the postponement of the determination to a later stage of
the proceedings (including during the trial).
(6) The matters a judicial officer may take into account in deciding
whether there are special circumstances for the purposes of
subsection (5) include (but are not limited to) the following:
(a) the cost implications for the parties;
(b) the resources available to the court at the time;
(c) the extent to which establishing the serious harm element is
linked to other issues for determination during the trial for the
proceedings.
(7) Without limiting subsection (5), the judicial officer may determine
the serious harm element is not established on the pleadings
without the need for further evidence if satisfied that the pleaded
particulars are insufficient to establish the element.
(8) Nothing in this section limits the powers that a judicial officer may
have apart from this section to dismiss defamation proceedings
(whether before or after the trial commences).
Division 2A Exemptions from liability for digital intermediaries
9B Definitions
In this Division:
caching service means an online service whose principal function
is to provide automatic, intermediate and temporary storage of
content for the purpose of making the onward electronic
transmission of the content more efficient for its users.
Example for definition caching service
A service for temporarily and automatically storing files that are most frequently
downloaded by users of a website to speed up the download time for the files.
conduit service means an online service whose principal function
is to enable its users to access or use networks or other
infrastructure to connect to, or send or receive data by means of,
the internet.
Examples for definition conduit service
1 A service provided by an internet service provider enabling its users to
connect to the internet.
Part 2 General principles
Division 2A Exemptions from liability for digital intermediaries
Defamation Act 2006 9
2 An internet-based service enabling its users to send emails or send text
messages to other persons.
search engine means a software application or system designed to
enable its users to search for content on the internet.
search engine provider, for a search engine, means a person who
maintains, or provides users with access to the search functions of,
the search engine.
search result means a result generated by a search engine that is
limited to identifying a webpage on which content is located by
reference to one or more of the following:
(a) the title of the webpage;
(b) a hyperlink to the webpage;
(c) an extract from the webpage;
(d) an image from the webpage.
storage service means an online service, other than a caching
service, whose principal function is to enable its users to store
content remotely.
Example for definition storage service
An internet-based cloud service enabling its users to store documents, videos or
photographs for later retrieval.
9C Exemption for digital intermediaries providing caching,
conduit or storage services
(1) A digital intermediary is not liable for defamation for the publication
of digital matter if the intermediary proves:
(a) the matter was published using one or more of the following
services provided by the intermediary:
(i) a caching service;
(ii) a conduit service;
(iii) a storage service; and
(b) the intermediary's role in the publication was limited to
providing one or more of the services mentioned in
paragraph (a); and
Part 2 General principles
Division 2A Exemptions from liability for digital intermediaries
Defamation Act 2006 10
(c) the intermediary did not do any of the following:
(i) initiate the steps required to publish the matter;
(ii) select any of the recipients of the matter;
(iii) encourage the poster of the matter to publish the matter;
(iv) edit the content of the matter, whether before or after it
was published;
(v) promote the matter, whether before or after it was
published.
(2) Subsection (1)(c) does not apply in relation to action taken because
it is required by or under a law of an Australian jurisdiction or an
order of an Australian court or Australian tribunal.
Example for subsection (2)
Action taken to comply with a code of conduct or other document regulating
conduct that a digital intermediary is required to comply with by a law of an
Australian jurisdiction.
(3) Subsection (1) applies regardless of whether the digital
intermediary knew, or ought reasonably to have known, the digital
matter was defamatory.
9D Exemption for search engine providers
(1) A search engine provider for a search engine is not liable for
defamation for:
(a) the publication of digital matter comprised of search results if
the provider's role was limited to providing an automated
process for the user of the search engine to generate the
results; or
(b) the publication of digital matter to which the search results
provide a hyperlink if the provider's role in the publication of
the matter is limited to the role mentioned in paragraph (a).
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply in relation to search results, or to
digital matter to which the search results provide hyperlinks, to the
extent the results are promoted or prioritised by the search engine
provider because of a payment or other benefit given to the
provider by or on behalf of a third party.
(3) Subsection (1) applies regardless of whether the search engine
provider knew, or ought reasonably to have known, the digital
matter was defamatory.
Part 2 General principles
Division 2A Exemptions from liability for digital intermediaries
Defamation Act 2006 11
9E Early determination of digital intermediary exemptions
(1) The judicial officer in defamation proceedings:
(a) is to determine whether a defendant has a digital intermediary
exemption; and
(b) is to determine whether a digital intermediary exemption is
established as soon as practicable before the trial for the
proceedings commences unless satisfied that there are good
reasons to postpone the determination to a later stage of the
proceedings; and
(c) may make any orders the judicial officer considers appropriate
concerning the determination of the issue, including
dismissing the proceedings if satisfied the digital intermediary
exemption is established.
(2) Without limiting subsection (1):
(a) the following matters are relevant in deciding whether there
are good reasons to postpone the determination of whether a
digital intermediary exemption is established to a later stage of
the proceedings:
(i) the cost implications for the parties;
(ii) the resources available to the court at the time;
(iii) the extent to which technical or scientific issues are
raised in the proceedings;
(iv) the extent to which establishing the digital intermediary
exemption is linked to other issues for determination
during the trial for the proceedings; and
(b) the judicial officer may determine a digital intermediary
exemption is established on the pleadings without the need for
further evidence if satisfied that the pleaded particulars are
sufficient to establish the exemption.
(3) Nothing in this section limits the powers that a judicial officer may
have apart from this section to dismiss defamation proceedings,
whether before or after the trial for the proceedings commences.
(4) In this section:
digital intermediary exemption means an exemption from liability
for defamation mentioned in section 9C or 9D.
Part 2 General principles
Division 3 Choice of law
Defamation Act 2006 12
Division 3 Choice of law
10 Choice of law for defamation proceedings
(1) If a matter is published wholly within a particular Australian
jurisdictional area, the substantive law that is applicable in that area
must be applied in this jurisdiction to determine any cause of action
for defamation based on the publication.
(2) If there is a multiple publication of matter in more than one
Australian jurisdictional area, the substantive law applicable in the
Australian jurisdictional area with which the harm occasioned by the
publication as a whole has its closest connection must be applied in
this jurisdiction to determine each cause of action for defamation
based on the publication.
(3) In determining the Australian jurisdictional area with which the harm
occasioned by a publication of matter has its closest connection, a
court may take into account:
(a) the place at the time of publication where the plaintiff was
ordinarily resident or, in the case of a corporation that may
assert a cause of action for defamation, the place where the
corporation had its principal place of business at that time; and
(b) the extent of publication in each relevant Australian
jurisdictional area; and
(c) the extent of harm sustained by the plaintiff in each relevant
Australian jurisdictional area; and
(d) any other matter that the court considers relevant.
(4) For the purposes of this section, the substantive law applicable in
an Australian jurisdictional area does not include any law
prescribing rules for choice of law that differ from the rules
prescribed by this section.
(5) In this section:
Australian jurisdictional area means:
(a) the geographical area of Australia that lies within the territorial
limits of a particular State (including its coastal waters), but not
including any territory, place or other area referred to in
paragraph (c); or
Part 3 Resolution of civil disputes without litigation
Division 1 Concerns notices and offers to make amends
Defamation Act 2006 13
(b) the geographical area of Australia that lies within the territorial
limits of a particular Territory (including its coastal waters), but
not including any territory, place or other area referred to in
paragraph (c); or
(c) any territory, place or other geographical area of Australia
over which the Commonwealth has legislative competence but
over which no State or Territory has legislative competence.
external Territory means a Territory, other than the Australian
Capital Territory, the Jervis Bay Territory or the Northern Territory,
for the government of which as a Territory provision is made by a
Commonwealth Act.
geographical area of Australia includes:
(a) the territorial sea of Australia; and
(b) any external Territory.
Jervis Bay Territory means the territory referred to in the Jervis
Bay Territory Acceptance Act 1915 (Cth).
multiple publication means publication by a particular person of
the same, or substantially the same, matter in substantially the
same form to 2 or more persons.
Part 3 Resolution of civil disputes without litigation
Division 1 Concerns notices and offers to make amends
11 Application of Division
(1) This Division applies if a person (the publisher) publishes matter
(the matter in question) that is, or may be, defamatory of another
person (the aggrieved person).
(2) The provisions of this Division may be used instead of the
provisions of any rules of court or any other law in relation to
payment into court or offers of compromise.
(3) This Division does not prevent a publisher or aggrieved person from
making or accepting a settlement offer in relation to the publication
of the matter in question otherwise than in accordance with the
provisions of this Division.
Part 3 Resolution of civil disputes without litigation
Division 1 Concerns notices and offers to make amends
Defamation Act 2006 14
11A Concerns notices
(1) For the purpose of this Act, a notice is a concerns notice if:
(a) the notice:
(i) is in writing; and
(ii) specifies the location where the matter in question can
be accessed; and
(iii) informs the publisher of the defamatory imputations that
the aggrieved person considers are or may be carried
about the aggrieved person by the matter in question;
and
(iv) informs the publisher of the harm that the person
considers to be serious harm to the person's reputation
caused, or likely to be caused, by the publication of the
matter in question; and
(v) for an aggrieved person that is an excluded
corporation – also informs the publisher of the financial
loss that the corporation considers to be serious financial
loss caused, or likely to be caused, by the publication of
the matter in question; and
(b) a copy of the matter in question is, if practicable, provided to
the publisher together with the notice.
Example for subsection (1)(a)(ii)
A webpage address.
(2) To avoid doubt, a document that is required to be filed or lodged to
commence defamation proceedings cannot be used as a concerns
notice.
(3) If a concerns notice fails to particularise adequately any of the
information required by subsection (1)(a)(ii), (iii), (iv) or (v), the
publisher may give the aggrieved person a written notice (a further
particulars notice) requesting that the aggrieved person provide
reasonable further particulars as specified in the further particulars
notice about the information concerned.
(4) An aggrieved person to whom a further particulars notice is given
must provide the reasonable further particulars specified in the
notice within 14 days (or any further period agreed by the publisher
and aggrieved person) after being given the notice.
Part 3 Resolution of civil disputes without litigation
Division 1 Concerns notices and offers to make amends
Defamation Act 2006 15
(5) An aggrieved person who fails to provide the reasonable further
particulars specified in a further particulars notice within the
applicable period is taken not to have given the publisher a
concerns notice for the purposes of this section.
Note for section 11A
Section 11B requires a concerns notice to be given before proceedings for
defamation can be commenced.
11B Defamation proceedings cannot be commenced without
concerns notice
(1) An aggrieved person cannot commence defamation proceedings
unless:
(a) the person has given the proposed defendant a concerns
notice in respect of the matter concerned; and
(b) the imputations to be relied on by the person in the proposed
proceedings were particularised in the concerns notice; and
(c) the applicable period for an offer to make amends has
elapsed.
(2) Subsection (1)(b) does not prevent reliance on:
(a) some, but not all, of the imputations particularised in a
concerns notice; or
(b) imputations that are substantially the same as those
particularised in a concerns notice.
(3) The court may grant leave for proceedings to be commenced
despite non-compliance with subsection (1)(c), but only if the
proposed plaintiff satisfies the court:
(a) the commencement of proceedings after the end of the
applicable period for an offer to make amends contravenes
the limitation law; or
(b) it is just and reasonable to grant leave.
(4) The commencement of proceedings contravenes the limitation law
for the purposes of subsection (3)(a) if the proceedings could not be
commenced after the end of the applicable period for an offer to
make amends because the court will have ceased to have power to
extend the limitation period.
Part 3 Resolution of civil disputes without litigation
Division 1 Concerns notices and offers to make amends
Defamation Act 2006 16
(5) In this section:
limitation law, see section 12(2)(b), Part III, Division 3 and Part V,
Division 3 of the Limitation Act 1981.
12 Publisher may make offer to make amends
(1) The publisher may make an offer to make amends to the aggrieved
person.
(2) The offer may be:
(a) in relation to the matter in question generally; or
(b) limited to any particular defamatory imputations that the
publisher accepts that the matter in question carries.
(3) If 2 or more persons published the matter in question, an offer to
make amends by one or more of them does not affect the liability of
the other or others.
(4) An offer to make amends is taken to have been made without
prejudice unless the offer provides otherwise.
13 When offer to make amends may be made
(1) An offer to make amends cannot be made if:
(a) the applicable period for an offer to make amends has
expired; or
(b) a defence has been served in an action brought by the
aggrieved person against the publisher in relation to the
matter in question.
(2) For the purposes of this Act, the applicable period for an offer to
make amends is:
(a) if the aggrieved person has provided further particulars in
response to a further particulars notice about a concerns
notice after 14 days have elapsed since the concerns notice
was given – 14 days since the publisher was given the further
particulars; or
(b) in any other case – 28 days since the publisher was given a
concerns notice by the aggrieved person.
(3) If a publisher gives more than one further particulars notice,
subsection (2)(a) applies only in respect of the first notice.
Part 3 Resolution of civil disputes without litigation
Division 1 Concerns notices and offers to make amends
Defamation Act 2006 17
14 Content of offer to make amends
(1) An offer to make amends:
(a) must be in writing; and
(b) must be readily identifiable as an offer to make amends under
this Division; and
(ba) must provide for the offer to be open for acceptance for at
least 28 days commencing on the day the offer is made; and
(c) if the offer is limited to any particular defamatory imputations –
must state that the offer is so limited and particularise the
imputations to which the offer is limited; and
(d) must include an offer to publish, or join in publishing, a
reasonable correction of, or a clarification of or additional
information about, the matter in question or, if the offer is
limited to any particular defamatory imputations, the
imputations to which the offer is limited; and
(e) if material containing the matter has been given to someone
else by the publisher or with the publisher's knowledge – must
include an offer to take, or join in taking, reasonable steps to
tell the other person that the matter is or may be defamatory of
the aggrieved person; and
(f) must include an offer to pay the expenses reasonably incurred
by the aggrieved person before the offer was made and the
expenses reasonably incurred by the aggrieved person in
considering the offer.
(1A) In addition to the matters referred to in subsection (1), an offer to
make amends may include any other kind of offer, or particulars of
any other action taken by the publisher, to redress the harm
sustained by the aggrieved person because of the matter in
question, including (but not limited to):
(a) an offer to publish, or join in publishing, an apology in relation
to the matter in question or, if the offer is limited to any
particular defamatory imputations, the imputations to which
the offer is limited; or
(b) if the matter is digital matter – an offer to take access
prevention steps in relation to the matter; or
(c) an offer to pay compensation for any economic or
non-economic loss of the aggrieved person; or
Part 3 Resolution of civil disputes without litigation
Division 1 Concerns notices and offers to make amends
Defamation Act 2006 18
(d) the particulars of any correction or apology made, or action
taken, before the date of the offer.
(1B) If the matter in question is digital matter, an offer to take access
prevention steps may be made instead of, or in addition to, either or
both of the offers mentioned in subsection (1)(d) and (e).
(2) Without limiting subsection (1A)(c), an offer to pay compensation
may comprise or include any one or more of the following:
(a) an offer to pay a stated amount;
(b) an offer to pay an amount to be agreed between the publisher
and the aggrieved person;
(c) an offer to pay an amount determined by an arbitrator
appointed, or agreed on, by the publisher and the aggrieved
person;
(d) an offer to pay an amount determined by a court.
(3) If an offer to make amends is accepted, a court may, on the
application of the aggrieved person or publisher, determine:
(a) if the offer provides for a court to determine the amount of
compensation payable under the offer – the amount of
compensation to be paid under the offer; and
(b) any other question that arises about what must be done to
carry out the terms of the offer.
(4) The powers conferred on a court by subsection (3) are exercisable:
(a) if the aggrieved person has brought proceedings against the
publisher in any court for defamation in relation to the matter
in question – by that court in those proceedings; and
(b) except as provided in paragraph (a), by the Supreme Court.
15 Withdrawal of offer to make amends
(1) An offer to make amends may be withdrawn before it is accepted
by notice in writing given to the aggrieved person.
(2) A publisher who has withdrawn an offer to make amends may make
a renewed offer.
(3) A renewed offer may (but need not) be in the same terms as the
withdrawn offer.
Part 3 Resolution of civil disputes without litigation
Division 1 Concerns notices and offers to make amends
Defamation Act 2006 19
(4) A renewed offer is to be treated as a new offer (including for the
purposes of section 13).
(5) However, the time limit specified in section 13 for the making of
offers to make amends does not prevent the making of a renewed
offer that is not in the same terms as the withdrawn offer if:
(a) the renewed offer represents a genuine attempt by the
publisher to address matters of concern raised by the
aggrieved person about the withdrawn offer; and
(b) the renewed offer is made within 14 days after the withdrawal
of the withdrawn offer or any other period agreed by the
publisher and the aggrieved person.
16 Effect of acceptance of offer to make amends
(1) If the publisher carries out the terms of an offer to make amends
(including payment of any compensation under the offer) that is
accepted, the aggrieved person cannot assert, continue or enforce
an action for defamation against the publisher in relation to the
matter in question even if the offer was limited to any particular
defamatory imputations.
(2) A court may (but need not):
(a) order the publisher to pay the aggrieved person the expenses
reasonably incurred by the aggrieved person as a result of
accepting the offer; and
(b) order any costs incurred by the aggrieved person that form
part of those expenses to be assessed on an indemnity basis.
(3) The powers conferred on a court by subsection (2) are exercisable:
(a) if the aggrieved person has brought proceedings against the
publisher in any court for defamation in relation to the matter
in question – by that court in those proceedings; and
(b) except as provided in paragraph (a), by the Supreme Court.
Part 3 Resolution of civil disputes without litigation
Division 1 Concerns notices and offers to make amends
Defamation Act 2006 20
17 Effect of failure to accept reasonable offer to make amends
(1) If an offer to make amends is made in relation to the matter in
question but is not accepted, it is a defence to an action for
defamation against the publisher in relation to the matter if:
(a) the publisher made the offer as soon as reasonably
practicable after the publisher was given a concerns notice in
respect of the matter (and, in any event, within the applicable
period for an offer to make amends); and
(b) the publisher was ready and willing, on acceptance of the offer
by the aggrieved person, to carry out the terms of the offer;
and
(c) in all the circumstances the offer was reasonable.
(2) In determining whether an offer to make amends is reasonable, a
court:
(a) must have regard to any correction or apology published
before any trial arising out of the matter in question, including
the extent to which the correction or apology is brought to the
attention of the audience of the matter in question taking into
account:
(i) the prominence given to the correction or apology as
published in comparison to the prominence given to the
matter in question as published; and
(ii) the period that elapses between publication of the matter
in question and publication of the correction or apology;
and
(b) may have regard to:
(i) whether the aggrieved person refused to accept an offer
that was limited to any particular defamatory imputations
because the aggrieved person did not agree with the
publisher about the imputations that the matter in
question carried; and
(ii) any other matter that the court considers relevant.
Part 3 Resolution of civil disputes without litigation
Division 2 Apologies
Defamation Act 2006 21
18 Inadmissibility of evidence of certain statements and
admissions
(1) Evidence of any statement or admission made in connection with
the making or acceptance of an offer to make amends is not
admissible as evidence in any legal proceedings (whether criminal
or civil).
(2) Subsection (1) does not prevent the admission of evidence in any
legal proceedings in order to determine:
(a) any issue arising under, or relating to the application of, a
provision of this Division; or
(b) costs in defamation proceedings.
Division 2 Apologies
19 Effect of apology on liability for defamation
(1) An apology made by or on behalf of a person in connection with
any defamatory matter alleged to have been published by the
person:
(a) does not constitute an express or implied admission of fault or
liability by the person in connection with that matter; and
(b) is not relevant to the determination of fault or liability in
connection with that matter.
(2) Evidence of an apology made by or on behalf of a person in
connection with any defamatory matter alleged to have been
published by the person is not admissible in any civil proceedings
as evidence of the fault or liability of the person in connection with
that matter.
(3) Nothing in this section limits the operation of section 35.
Part 4 Litigation of civil disputes
Division 1 General
Defamation Act 2006 22
Part 4 Litigation of civil disputes
Division 1 General
20 Leave required for multiple proceedings in relation to
publication of same defamatory matter
(1) This section applies to a person who has brought defamation
proceedings for damages, whether in this jurisdiction or elsewhere,
against a person (a previous defendant) in relation to the
publication of a matter.
(2) The person may not bring further defamation proceedings for
damages against a previous defendant or an associate of a
previous defendant in relation to the same or any other publication
of the same or like matter, except with the leave of the court in
which the further proceedings are to be brought.
(3) A person is an associate of a previous defendant if, at the time of
the publication to which the previous defamation proceedings
related, the person was:
(a) an employee of the defendant; or
(b) a person publishing matter as a contractor of the defendant; or
(c) an associated entity of the defendant (or an employee or
contractor of the associated entity).
20A Orders for preliminary discovery about posters of digital
matter
(1) This section applies if the court procedure law for a court allows a
person seeking to bring defamation proceedings for the publication
of digital matter to obtain an order for, or in the nature of,
preliminary discovery for either or both of the following purposes:
(a) to obtain information to assist in identifying the posters of the
matter;
(b) to obtain information to assist in locating physical or digital
addresses for the posters of the matter to allow concerns
notices to be given to them or defamation proceedings against
them to be commenced.
Part 4 Litigation of civil disputes
Division 2 Defences
Defamation Act 2006 23
(2) Despite anything to the contrary in the court procedure law for a
court, the court must take the following matters into account before
making an order mentioned in subsection (1):
(a) the objects of this Act;
(b) privacy, safety or other public interest considerations that may
arise if the order is made.
Example for subsection 2(b)
Evidence suggesting the poster of digital matter is in fear of domestic violence
from the person seeking an order to obtain the poster's address.
(3) This section does not limit the matters the court may take into
account before making an order mentioned in subsection (1).
(4) In this section:
court procedure law, for a court, means:
(a) rules of court for the court; or
(b) an Act or other legislation that regulates the practice or
procedure of the court; or
(c) the general law concerning the inherent or implied jurisdiction
or powers of the court.
Division 2 Defences
21 Scope of defences under general law and other law not limited
(1) A defence under this Division is additional to any other defence or
exclusion of liability available to the defendant apart from this Act
(including under the general law) and does not of itself vitiate, limit
or abrogate any other defence or exclusion of liability.
(2) If a defence under this Division to the publication of defamatory
matter may be defeated by proof that the publication was actuated
by malice, the general law applies in defamation proceedings in
which the defence is raised to determine whether a particular
publication of matter was actuated by malice.
22 Defence of justification
It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the
defendant proves that the defamatory imputations carried by the
matter of which the plaintiff complains are substantially true.
Part 4 Litigation of civil disputes
Division 2 Defences
Defamation Act 2006 24
23 Defence of contextual truth
(1) It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the
defendant proves that:
(a) the matter carried one or more imputations that are
substantially true (contextual imputations); and
(b) any defamatory imputations of which the plaintiff complains
that are not contextual imputations and are also carried by the
matter do not further harm the reputation of the plaintiff
because of the substantial truth of the contextual imputations.
(2) The contextual imputations on which the defendant may rely to
establish the defence include imputations of which the plaintiff
complains.
24 Defence of absolute privilege
(1) It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the
defendant proves that it was published on an occasion of absolute
privilege.
(2) Without limiting subsection (1), matter is published on an occasion
of absolute privilege if:
(a) the matter is published in the course of the proceedings of a
parliamentary body, including (but not limited to):
(i) the publication of a document by order, or under the
authority, of the body; and
(ii) the publication of the debates and proceedings of the
body by or under the authority of the body or any law;
and
(iii) the publication of matter while giving evidence before the
body; and
(iv) the publication of matter while presenting or submitting a
document to the body; or
(b) the matter is published in the course of the proceedings of an
Australian court or Australian tribunal, including (but not
limited to):
(i) the publication of matter in any document filed or lodged
with, or otherwise submitted to, the court or tribunal
(including any originating process); and
Part 4 Litigation of civil disputes
Division 2 Defences
Defamation Act 2006 25
(ii) the publication of matter while giving evidence before the
court or tribunal; and
(iii) the publication of matter in any judgment, order or other
determination of the court or tribunal; or
(ba) the matter is published to a person who, at the time of the
publication, is an official of a police force or service of an
Australian jurisdiction and it is published to the official while
the official is acting in an official capacity; or
(c) the matter is published on an occasion that, if published in
another Australian jurisdiction, would be an occasion of
absolute privilege in that jurisdiction under a provision of a law
of the jurisdiction corresponding to this section; or
(d) the matter is published by a person or body in any
circumstances specified in Schedule 1.
(3) In this section:
official, of a police force or service of an Australian jurisdiction
means:
(a) an officer, employee or member of staff of the police force or
service; or
(b) another person engaged to act for or on behalf of the police
force or service.
25 Defence for publication of public documents
(1) It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the
defendant proves that the matter was contained in:
(a) a public document or a fair copy of a public document; or
(b) a fair summary of, or a fair extract from, a public document.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), if a report or other document
under the law of a country would be a public document except for
non-compliance with a provision of that law about:
(a) the formal requirements for the content or layout of the report
or document; or
(b) the time within which the report or document is prepared, or
presented, submitted, tabled or laid to or before a person or
body,
Part 4 Litigation of civil disputes
Division 2 Defences
Defamation Act 2006 26
the report or document is a public document despite that non-
compliance.
(3) A defence established under subsection (1) is defeated if, and only
if, the plaintiff proves that the defamatory matter was not published
honestly for the information of the public or the advancement of
education.
(4) In this section:
public document means:
(a) any report or paper published by a parliamentary body, or a
record of votes, debates or other proceedings relating to a
parliamentary body published by or under the authority of the
body or any law; or
(b) any judgment, order or other determination of a court or
arbitral tribunal of any country in civil proceedings and
including:
(i) any record of the court or tribunal relating to the
judgment, order or determination or to its enforcement or
satisfaction; and
(ii) any report of the court or tribunal about its judgment,
order or determination and the reasons for its judgment,
order or determination; or
(c) any report or other document that under the law of any
country:
(i) is authorised to be published; or
(ii) is required to be presented or submitted to, tabled in, or
laid before, a parliamentary body; or
(d) any document issued by the government (including a local
government) of a country, or by an officer, employee or
agency of the government, for the information of the public; or
(e) any record or other document open to inspection by the public
that is kept:
(i) by an Australian jurisdiction; or
(ii) by a statutory authority of an Australian jurisdiction; or
(iii) by an Australian court; or
Part 4 Litigation of civil disputes
Division 2 Defences
Defamation Act 2006 27
(iv) under legislation of an Australian jurisdiction; or
(f) any other document issued, kept or published by a person,
body or organisation of another Australian jurisdiction that is
treated in that jurisdiction as a public document under a
provision of a law of the jurisdiction corresponding to this
section; or
(g) any document of a kind specified in Schedule 2.
26 Defences of fair report of proceedings of public concern
(1) It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the
defendant proves that the matter was, or was contained in, a fair
report of any proceedings of public concern.
(2) It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the
defendant proves that:
(a) the matter was, or was contained in, an earlier published
report of proceedings of public concern; and
(b) the matter was, or was contained in, a fair copy of, a fair
summary of, or a fair extract from, the earlier published report;
and
(c) the defendant had no knowledge that would reasonably make
the defendant aware that the earlier published report was not
fair.
(3) A defence established under subsection (1) or (2) is defeated if,
and only if, the plaintiff proves that the defamatory matter was not
published honestly for the information of the public or the
advancement of education.
(4) In this section:
proceedings of public concern means:
(a) any proceedings in public of a parliamentary body; or
(b) any proceedings in public of an international organisation of
any countries or of the governments of any countries; or
(c) any proceedings in public of an international conference at
which the governments of any countries are represented; or
Part 4 Litigation of civil disputes
Division 2 Defences
Defamation Act 2006 28
(d) any proceedings in public of:
(i) the International Court of Justice, or any other judicial or
arbitral tribunal, for the decision of any matter in dispute
between nations; or
(ii) any other international judicial or arbitral tribunal; or
(e) any proceedings in public of a court or arbitral tribunal of any
country; or
(f) any proceedings in public of an inquiry held under the law of
any country or under the authority of the government of any
country; or
(g) any proceedings in public of a local government body of any
Australian jurisdiction; or
(h) proceedings of a learned society, or of a committee or
governing body of the society, under its relevant objects, but
only to the extent that the proceedings relate to a decision or
adjudication made in Australia about:
(i) a member or members of the society; or
(ii) a person subject by contract or otherwise by law to
control by the society; or
(i) proceedings of a sport or recreation association, or of a
committee or governing body of the association, under its
relevant objects, but only to the extent that the proceedings
relate to a decision or adjudication made in Australia about:
(i) a member or members of the association; or
(ii) a person subject by contract or otherwise by law to
control by the association; or
(j) proceedings of a trade association, or of a committee or
governing body of the association, under its relevant objects,
but only to the extent that the proceedings relate to a decision
or adjudication made in Australia about:
(i) a member or members of the association; or
(ii) a person subject by contract or otherwise by law to
control by the association; or
Part 4 Litigation of civil disputes
Division 2 Defences
Defamation Act 2006 29
(k) any proceedings of a public meeting (with or without restriction
on the people attending) of shareholders of a public company
under the Corporations Act 2001 held anywhere in Australia;
or
(l) any proceedings of a public meeting (with or without restriction
on the people attending) held anywhere in Australia if the
proceedings relate to a matter of public interest, including the
advocacy or candidature of a person for public office; or
(m) any proceedings of an ombudsman of any country if the
proceedings relate to a report of the ombudsman; or
(n) any proceedings in public of a law reform body of any country;
or
(o) any other proceedings conducted by, or proceedings of, a
person, body or organisation of another Australian jurisdiction
that are treated in that jurisdiction as proceedings of public
concern under a provision of a law of the jurisdiction
corresponding to this section; or
(p) any proceedings of a kind specified in Schedule 3.
(5) In this section:
law reform body, of a country, means a body (however described
and whether or not permanent or full-time) established by law to
conduct inquiries into, and to make recommendations on, reforming
the laws of that country.
learned society means a body, wherever formed:
(a) the objects of which include the advancement of any art,
science or religion or the advancement of learning in any field;
and
(b) authorised by its constitution:
(i) to exercise control over, or adjudicate on, matters
connected with those objects; and
(ii) to make findings or decisions having effect, by law or
custom, in any part of Australia.
ombudsman, of a country, means a person (however described
and whether or not permanent or full-time) authorised by law to
investigate complaints about the actions or other conduct of any
public officials or public bodies of that country.
Part 4 Litigation of civil disputes
Division 2 Defences
Defamation Act 2006 30
relevant objects, of a learned society, sport or recreation
association or trade association, means:
(a) for a learned society – objects of the kind referred to in
paragraph (a) of the definition of learned society in this
subsection; or
(b) for a sport or recreation association – objects of the kind
referred to in paragraph (a) of the definition of sport or
recreation association in this subsection; or
(c) for a trade association – objects of the kind referred to in
paragraph (a) of the definition of trade association in this
subsection.
sport or recreation association means a body, wherever formed:
(a) the objects of which include the promotion of any game, sport,
or pastime to the playing of which or exercise of which the
public is admitted as spectators or otherwise and the
promotion or protection of the interests of people connected
with the game, sport, or pastime; and
(b) authorised by its constitution:
(i) to exercise control over, or adjudicate on, matters
connected with the game, sport, or pastime; and
(ii) to make findings or decisions having effect, by law or
custom, in any part of Australia.
trade association means a body, wherever formed:
(a) the objects of which include the promotion of any calling, that
is to say, a trade, business, industry or profession and the
promotion or protection of the interests of people engaged in
any calling; and
(b) authorised by its constitution:
(i) to exercise control over, or adjudicate on, matters
connected with a calling or the conduct of people
engaged in the calling; and
(ii) to make findings or decisions having effect, by law or
custom, in any part of Australia.
Part 4 Litigation of civil disputes
Division 2 Defences
Defamation Act 2006 31
26A Defence of publication of matter concerning issue of public
interest
(1) It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the
defendant proves that:
(a) the matter concerns an issue of public interest; and
(b) the defendant reasonably believed that the publication of the
matter was in the public interest.
(2) In determining whether the defence is established, a court must
take into account all of the circumstances of the case.
(3) Without limiting subsection (2), the court may take into account the
following factors to the extent the court considers them applicable in
the circumstances:
(a) the seriousness of any defamatory imputation carried by the
matter published;
(b) the extent to which the matter published distinguishes
between suspicions, allegations and proven facts;
(c) the extent to which the matter published relates to the
performance of the public functions or activities of the person;
(d) whether it was in the public interest in the circumstances for
the matter to be published expeditiously;
(e) the sources of the information in the matter published,
including the integrity of the sources;
(f) if a source of the information in the matter published is a
person whose identity is being kept confidential, whether there
is good reason for the person's identity to be kept confidential;
(g) whether the matter published contained the substance of the
person's side of the story and, if not, whether a reasonable
attempt was made by the defendant to obtain and publish a
response from the person;
(h) any other steps taken to verify the information in the matter
published;
(i) the importance of freedom of expression in the discussion of
issues of public interest.
Example for subsection (3)(f)
To comply with an applicable professional code or standard.
Part 4 Litigation of civil disputes
Division 2 Defences
Defamation Act 2006 32
(4) Subsection (3) does not:
(a) require each factor referred to in that subsection to be taken
into account; or
(b) limit the matters that the court may take into account.
27 Defence of qualified privilege for provision of certain
information
(1) There is a defence of qualified privilege for the publication of
defamatory matter to a person (the recipient) if the defendant
proves that:
(a) the recipient has an interest or apparent interest in having
information on some subject; and
(b) the matter is published to the recipient in the course of giving
to the recipient information on that subject; and
(c) the conduct of the defendant in publishing that matter is
reasonable in the circumstances.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), a recipient has an apparent
interest in having information on some subject if, and only if, at the
time of the publication in question, the defendant believes on
reasonable grounds that the recipient has that interest.
(3) In determining for the purposes of subsection (1) whether the
conduct of the defendant in publishing matter about a person is
reasonable in the circumstances, a court may take into account the
following factors to the extent the court considers them applicable in
the circumstances:
(a) the seriousness of any defamatory imputation carried by the
matter published;
(b) the extent to which the matter published distinguishes
between suspicions, allegations and proven facts;
(c) the nature of the business environment in which the defendant
operates;
(d) whether it was appropriate in the circumstances for the matter
to be published expeditiously;
(e) any other steps taken to verify the information in the matter
published.
Part 4 Litigation of civil disputes
Division 2 Defences
Defamation Act 2006 33
(3A) Subsection (3) does not:
(a) require each factor referred to in that subsection to be taken
into account; or
(b) limit the matters that the court may take into account.
(3B) It is not necessary to prove that the matter published concerned an
issue of public interest to establish the defence of qualified privilege
under subsection (1).
(4) To avoid doubt, a defence of qualified privilege under
subsection (1) is defeated if the plaintiff proves that the publication
of the defamatory matter was actuated by malice.
(5) However, a defence of qualified privilege under subsection (1) is
not defeated merely because the defamatory matter was published
for reward.
27A Defence of scientific or academic peer review
(1) It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the
defendant proves that:
(a) the matter was published in a scientific or academic journal
(whether published in electronic form or otherwise); and
(b) the matter relates to a scientific or academic issue; and
(c) an independent review of the matter's scientific or academic
merit was carried out before the matter was published in the
journal by:
(i) the editor of the journal if the editor has expertise in the
scientific or academic issue concerned; or
(ii) one or more persons with expertise in the scientific or
academic issue concerned.
(2) If there is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter in a
scientific or academic journal because of subsection (1), there is
also a defence to the publication of any assessment of the matter in
the same journal if the defendant proves that:
(a) the assessment was written by one or more of the persons
who carried out the independent review of the matter; and
(b) the assessment was written in the course of that review.
Part 4 Litigation of civil disputes
Division 2 Defences
Defamation Act 2006 34
(3) It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the
defendant proves that the matter was contained in a fair summary
of, or fair extract from, a matter or assessment for which there is a
defence because of subsection (1) or (2).
(4) If a journal has more than one editor, a reference in this section to
the editor of the journal is to be read as a reference to the editor or
editors who were responsible for deciding to publish the matter
concerned.
(5) A defence established under this section is defeated if, and only if,
the plaintiff proves that the defamatory matter or assessment was
not published honestly for the information of the public or the
advancement of education.
28 Defences of honest opinion
(1) It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the
defendant proves that:
(a) the matter was an expression of opinion of the defendant
rather than a statement of fact; and
(b) the opinion related to a matter of public interest; and
(c) the opinion is based on proper material.
(2) It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the
defendant proves that:
(a) the matter was an expression of opinion of an employee or
agent of the defendant rather than a statement of fact; and
(b) the opinion related to a matter of public interest; and
(c) the opinion is based on proper material.
(3) It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the
defendant proves that:
(a) the matter was an expression of opinion of a person (the
commentator), other than the defendant or an employee or
agent of the defendant, rather than a statement of fact; and
(b) the opinion related to a matter of public interest; and
(c) the opinion is based on proper material.
Part 4 Litigation of civil disputes
Division 2 Defences
Defamation Act 2006 35
(4) A defence established under this section is defeated if, and only if,
the plaintiff proves that:
(a) in the case of a defence under subsection (1) – the opinion
was not honestly held by the defendant at the time the
defamatory matter was published; or
(b) in the case of a defence under subsection (2) – the defendant
did not believe that the opinion was honestly held by the
employee or agent at the time the defamatory matter was
published; or
(c) in the case of a defence under subsection (3) – the defendant
had reasonable grounds to believe that the opinion was not
honestly held by the commentator at the time the defamatory
matter was published.
(5) For the purposes of this section, an opinion is based on proper
material if:
(a) the material on which it is based is:
(i) set out in specific or general terms in the published
matter; or
(ii) notorious; or
(iii) accessible from a reference, link or other access point
included in the matter; or
(iv) otherwise apparent from the context in which the matter
is published; and
(b) the material:
(i) is substantially true; or
(ii) was published on an occasion of absolute or qualified
privilege (whether under this Act or at general law); or
(iii) was published on an occasion that attracted the
protection of a defence under this section or section 25
or 26.
Example for subsection (5)(a)(iii)
A hyperlink on a webpage.
Part 4 Litigation of civil disputes
Division 2 Defences
Defamation Act 2006 36
(6) An opinion does not cease to be based on proper material only
because some of the material on which it is based is not proper
material if the opinion might reasonably be based on such of the
material as is proper material.
28A Defence for publications involving digital intermediaries
(1) It is a defence to the publication of defamatory digital matter if the
defendant proves:
(a) the defendant was a digital intermediary in relation to the
publication; and
(b) the defendant had, at the time of the publication, an
accessible complaints mechanism for the plaintiff to use; and
(c) if the plaintiff gave the defendant a written complaint under
this section about the publication – reasonable access
prevention steps, if steps were available, were taken in
relation to the publication, whether before the complaint was
given or within 7 days after the complaint was given.
Notes for subsection (1)
1 The defendant is not required to prove paragraph (c) to establish the defence
if the plaintiff has not given the defendant a complaint about the publication
under this section. Subsection (3) sets out requirements for giving
complaints.
2 Subsection (6) defines accessible complaints mechanism.
(2) For subsection (1)(c), reasonable access prevention steps were
taken in relation to the publication of digital matter if:
(a) for access prevention steps taken by the defendant – the
steps taken were reasonable for the defendant to take in the
circumstances; or
(b) for access prevention steps taken by another person – it was
reasonable for the defendant not to take steps because of the
steps already taken.
(3) A written complaint is given under this section about the publication
of defamatory digital matter if:
(a) the complaint contained information sufficient to enable a
reasonable person in the defendant’s circumstances to be
made aware of the following:
(i) the name of the plaintiff;
(ii) the matter and where it could be located;
Part 4 Litigation of civil disputes
Division 2 Defences
Defamation Act 2006 37
(iii) that the plaintiff considered the matter to be defamatory;
and
(b) the complaint was given using an accessible complaints
mechanism for the plaintiff to use or given to the defendant in
another way permitted by section 41.
(4) A defence under this section is defeated only if the plaintiff proves
the defendant was actuated by malice in establishing or providing
the online service by means of which the digital matter was
published.
(5) A defendant who would otherwise be a digital intermediary in
relation to the publication of digital matter does not cease to be a
digital intermediary for this section merely because the defendant
took steps to detect or identify, or steps to remove, block, disable or
otherwise prevent access by persons to, the following:
(a) defamatory or other unlawful content published, or sought to
be published, by a person using the online service provided by
the defendant;
(b) other content published, or sought to be published, by a
person using the online service provided by the defendant that
was incompatible with the terms or conditions under which the
service was provided.
Note for subsection (5)
This subsection allows a defendant to rely on the defence, despite the definition
of digital intermediary in section 3 excluding authors, originators or posters of
digital matter, if the defendant's editorial or moderating role over content
published using the online service was limited to the steps mentioned in this
subsection.
(6) In this section:
accessible complaints mechanism, for a plaintiff to use, means
an easily accessible address, location or other mechanism
available for the plaintiff to use to complain to the defendant about
the publication of the digital matter concerned.
Examples for definition accessible complaints mechanism
1 An email address or direct messaging address to which a complaint may be
sent.
2 A webpage, or a part of a webpage, enabling details about a complaint to be
uploaded or inputted.
Part 4 Litigation of civil disputes
Division 2 Defences
Defamation Act 2006 38
29 Defence of innocent dissemination
(1) It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the
defendant proves that:
(a) the defendant published the matter merely in the capacity, or
as an employee or agent, of a subordinate distributor; and
(b) the defendant neither knew, nor ought reasonably to have
known, that the matter was defamatory; and
(c) the defendant's lack of knowledge was not due to any
negligence on the part of the defendant.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1)(a), a person is a subordinate
distributor of defamatory matter if the person:
(a) was not the first or primary distributor of the matter; and
(b) was not the author or originator of the matter; and
(c) did not have any capacity to exercise editorial control over the
content of the matter (or over the publication of the matter)
before it was first published.
(3) Without limiting subsection (2)(a), a person is not the first or primary
distributor of matter merely because the person was involved in the
publication of the matter in the capacity of:
(a) a bookseller, newsagent or news-vendor; or
(b) a librarian; or
(c) a wholesaler or retailer of the matter; or
(d) a provider of postal or similar services by means of which the
matter is published; or
(e) a broadcaster of a live programme (whether on television,
radio or otherwise) containing the matter in circumstances in
which the broadcaster has no effective control over the person
who makes the statements that comprise the matter; or
(f) a provider of services consisting of:
(i) the processing, copying, distributing or selling of any
electronic medium in or on which the matter is recorded;
or
Part 4 Litigation of civil disputes
Division 3 Remedies
Defamation Act 2006 39
(ii) the operation of, or the provision of any equipment,
system or service, by means of which the matter is
retrieved, copied, distributed or made available in
electronic form; or
(g) an operator of, or a provider of access to, a communications
system by means of which the matter is transmitted, or made
available, by another person over whom the operator or
provider has no effective control; or
(h) a person who, on the instructions or at the direction of another
person, prints or produces, reprints or reproduces or
distributes the matter for or on behalf of that other person.
Division 3 Remedies
31 Damages to bear rational relationship to harm
In determining the amount of damages to be awarded in any
defamation proceedings, the court is to ensure there is an
appropriate and rational relationship between the harm sustained
by the plaintiff and the amount of damages awarded.
32 Damages for non-economic loss limited
(1) The maximum amount of damages for non-economic loss that may
be awarded in defamation proceedings is $250 000 or any other
amount adjusted in accordance with this section from time to time
(the maximum damages amount) that is applicable at the time
damages are awarded.
(2) The maximum damages amount is to be awarded only in a most
serious case.
(2A) Subsection (1) does not limit the court's power to award aggravated
damages if an award of aggravated damages is warranted in the
circumstances.
(2B) An award of aggravated damages is to be made separately to any
award of damages for non-economic loss to which subsection (1)
applies.
(3) The Minister must, on or before 1 July 2006 and on or before 1 July
in each succeeding year, declare, by order published in the
Gazette, the amount that is to apply, as from the date specified in
the order, for the purposes of subsection (1).
(4) The amount declared is to be the amount applicable under
subsection (1) (or that amount as last adjusted under this section)
Part 4 Litigation of civil disputes
Division 3 Remedies
Defamation Act 2006 40
adjusted by the percentage change in the amount estimated by the
Australian Statistician of the average weekly total earnings of full-
time adults in Australia over the 4 quarters preceding the date of
the declaration for which those estimates are, at that date,
available.
(5) An amount declared for the time being under this section applies to
the exclusion of the amount of $250 000 or an amount previously
adjusted under this section.
(6) If the Australian Statistician fails or ceases to estimate the amount
referred to in subsection (4), the amount declared is to be
determined in accordance with the Regulations.
(7) In adjusting an amount to be declared for the purposes of
subsection (1), the amount determined in accordance with
subsection (4) is to be rounded to the nearest $500.
(8) A declaration made or published in the Gazette after 1 July in a
year and specifying a date that is before the date it is made or
published as the date from which the amount declared by the order
is to apply has effect as from that specified date.
33 State of mind of defendant generally not relevant to awarding
damages
In awarding damages for defamation, the court is to disregard the
malice or other state of mind of the defendant at the time of the
publication of the defamatory matter to which the proceedings
relate or at any other time except to the extent that the malice or
other state of mind affects the harm sustained by the plaintiff.
34 Exemplary or punitive damages cannot be awarded
A plaintiff cannot be awarded exemplary or punitive damages for
defamation.
35 Factors in mitigation of damages
(1) Evidence is admissible on behalf of the defendant, in mitigation of
damages for the publication of defamatory matter, that:
(a) the defendant has made an apology to the plaintiff about the
publication of the defamatory matter; or
(b) the defendant has published a correction of the defamatory
matter; or
Part 4 Litigation of civil disputes
Division 3 Remedies
Defamation Act 2006 41
(c) the plaintiff has already recovered damages for defamation in
relation to any other publication of matter having the same
meaning or effect as the defamatory matter; or
(d) the plaintiff has brought proceedings for damages for
defamation in relation to any other publication of matter having
the same meaning or effect as the defamatory matter; or
(e) the plaintiff has received or agreed to receive compensation
for defamation in relation to any other publication of matter
having the same meaning or effect as the defamatory matter.
(2) Subsection (1) does not operate to limit the matters that can be
taken into account by a court in mitigation of damages.
36 Damages for multiple causes of action may be assessed as
single sum
If the court in defamation proceedings finds for the plaintiff as to
more than one cause of action, the judicial officer may assess
damages in a single sum.
36A Orders against non-party digital intermediaries concerning
defamatory digital matter
(1) This section applies in relation to defamation proceedings for the
publication of digital matter if:
(a) the plaintiff has obtained judgment for defamation against the
defendant in the proceedings; or
(b) a court has granted a temporary injunction or makes another
temporary order preventing the defendant from continuing to
publish, or from republishing, the matter pending the
determination of the proceedings; or
(c) a court has granted a final injunction or makes another final
order preventing the defendant from continuing to publish, or
from republishing, the matter.
(2) In defamation proceedings to which this section applies, the court
may order a digital intermediary who is not a party to the
proceedings (a non-party digital intermediary) to take access
prevention steps or other steps the court considers necessary in the
circumstances:
(a) to prevent or limit the continued publication or republication of
the matter; or
Part 4 Litigation of civil disputes
Division 4 Costs
Defamation Act 2006 42
(b) to comply with, or otherwise give effect to, the judgment,
injunction or other order mentioned in subsection (1).
(3) Without limiting subsection (2), an order under this section may:
(a) require one or more steps to be taken; or
(b) require a step to be taken in relation to all, or only some, of the
users of an online service.
(4) The court may not make an order under this section against a
non-party digital intermediary unless the intermediary has been
given an opportunity to be heard about whether it is appropriate for
the order to be made.
(5) Despite subsection (4), the court may make a temporary order
without giving the non-party digital intermediary an opportunity to be
heard about whether it is appropriate to make the order if the court
considers it necessary in the circumstances for the order to be
made expeditiously pending a subsequent hearing concerning
whether a further temporary order or a final order should be made.
(6) An order may be made under this section even if the non-party
digital intermediary is not, or may not be, liable for defamation,
including because of a defence, for the publication of the digital
matter to which the defamation proceedings relate.
(7) This section does not limit other powers the court may have apart
from this section to grant injunctions or make other orders requiring
a non-party digital intermediary to take access prevention steps or
other steps.
Division 4 Costs
37 Costs in defamation proceedings
(1) In awarding costs in defamation proceedings, the court may have
regard to:
(a) the way in which the parties to the proceedings conducted
their cases (including any misuse of a party's superior
financial position to hinder the early resolution of the
proceedings); and
(b) any other matters that the court considers relevant.
Part 5 Miscellaneous matters
Defamation Act 2006 43
(2) Without limiting subsection (1), a court must (unless the interests of
justice require otherwise):
(a) if defamation proceedings are successfully brought by a
plaintiff and costs in the proceedings are to be awarded to the
plaintiff – order costs of and incidental to the proceedings to
be assessed on an indemnity basis if the court is satisfied the
defendant unreasonably failed to make a settlement offer or
agree to a settlement offer proposed by the plaintiff; or
(b) if defamation proceedings are unsuccessfully brought by a
plaintiff and costs in the proceedings are to be awarded to the
defendant – order costs of and incidental to the proceedings to
be assessed on an indemnity basis if the court is satisfied the
plaintiff unreasonably failed to accept a settlement offer made
by the defendant.
(3) In this section:
settlement offer means any offer to settle the proceedings made
before the proceedings are determined, and includes an offer to
make amends (whether made before or after the proceedings are
commenced), that was a reasonable offer at the time it was made.
Part 5 Miscellaneous matters
38 Proof of publication
(1) If a document appears to be printed or otherwise produced by
means adapted for the production of numerous copies and there is
in the document a statement to the effect that the document is
printed, produced, published or distributed by or for a particular
person, the statement is evidence in defamation proceedings that
the document was so printed, produced, published or distributed.
(2) Evidence that a number or part of a document appearing to be a
periodical is printed, produced, published or distributed by or for a
particular person is evidence in defamation proceedings that a
document appearing to be another number or part of the periodical
was so printed, produced, published or distributed.
(3) In this section:
periodical includes any newspaper, review, magazine or other
printed document of which numbers or parts are published
periodically.
Part 5 Miscellaneous matters
Defamation Act 2006 44
39 Proof of convictions for offences
(1) If the question whether or not a person committed an offence is in
question in defamation proceedings:
(a) proof that the person was convicted of the offence by an
Australian court is conclusive evidence that the person
committed the offence; and
(b) proof that the person was convicted of the offence by a court
of any country (other than an Australian court) or a court
martial of any country is evidence that the person committed
the offence.
(2) For the purposes of this section, the contents of a document that is
evidence of conviction of an offence, and the contents of an
information, complaint, indictment, charge sheet or similar
document on which a person is convicted of an offence, are
admissible in evidence to identify the facts on which the conviction
is based.
(3) Subsection (2) does not affect the admissibility of other evidence to
identify the facts on which the conviction is based.
(4) In this section:
conviction, for an offence, includes a finding of guilt, but does not
include:
(a) a conviction that has been set aside or quashed; or
(b) a conviction for an offence for which a person has received a
pardon.
40 Incriminating answers, documents or things
(1) A person who is required to answer a question, or to discover or
produce a document or thing, in defamation proceedings is not
excused from answering the question or discovering or producing
the document or thing on the ground that the answer to the
question or the discovery or production of the document or thing
might tend to incriminate the person of an offence of criminal
defamation.
(2) However, any answer given to a question, or document or thing
discovered or produced, by a natural person in compliance with the
requirement is not admissible in evidence against the person in
proceedings for criminal defamation.
Part 5 Miscellaneous matters
Defamation Act 2006 45
41 Giving of notices and other documents
(1) For the purposes of this Act, a notice or other document may be
given to a person (or a notice or other document may be served on
a person):
(a) in the case of a natural person:
(i) by delivering it to the person personally; or
(ii) by sending it by post to the address specified by the
person for the giving or service of documents or, if no
such address is specified, the residential or business
address of the person last known to the person giving or
serving the document; or
(iii) by sending it by facsimile transmission to the facsimile
number of the person; or
(iv) sending it by email, messaging or other electronic
communication to an electronic address or location
indicated by the person for giving documents to, or
serving documents on, the person; or
(b) in the case of a body corporate:
(i) by leaving it with a person apparently of or above the
age of 16 years at, or by sending it by post to, the head
office, a registered office or a principal office of the body
corporate or to an address specified by the body
corporate for the giving or service of documents; or
(ii) by sending it by facsimile transmission to the facsimile
number of the body corporate; or
(iii) sending it by email, messaging or other electronic
communication to an electronic address or location
indicated by the body corporate for giving documents to,
or serving documents on, the body corporate.
Examples for subsection (1)(a)(iv) and (b)(iii)
1 An email address or direct messaging address set out on an internet-based
social media forum for contacting the administrator of the forum about content
on the forum.
2 An email address or direct messaging address provided by the poster of
digital matter on an internet-based social media forum for contacting the
poster about the content of the matter.
3 A form on a website provided by a digital intermediary enabling a user to
contact the intermediary by filling in the form or uploading documents.
Part 6 Repeals and transitional matters for Defamation Act 2006
Defamation Act 2006 46
(2) Nothing in this section affects the operation of any provision of a
law or of the rules of a court authorising a document to be given to
or served on a person in any other manner.
42 Regulations
The Administrator may make regulations, not inconsistent with this
Act, prescribing matters:
(a) required or permitted to be prescribed; or
(b) necessary or convenient to be prescribed for carrying out or
giving effect to this Act.
Part 6 Repeals and transitional matters for
Defamation Act 2006
43 Definitions
In this Part:
commencement date means the date on which this Part comes
into operation.
repealed Act means the Defamation Act 1938 as in force
immediately before the commencement date.
44 Repeal
The Acts specified in Schedule 4 are repealed.
45 Application of this Act
(1) This Act applies to the publication of defamatory matter after the
commencement date, unless subsection (2) applies.
(2) The provisions of this Act (other than this section) do not apply to a
cause of action for the publication of defamatory matter that
accrues after the commencement date (the post-commencement
action) if:
(a) the post-commencement action is one of 2 or more causes of
action in proceedings commenced by a plaintiff; and
(b) each cause of action in the proceedings accrues because of
the publication of the same, or substantially the same, matter
on separate occasions (whether by the same defendant or
another defendant); and
Part 7 Transitional matters for Defamation Legislation Amendment Act 2025
Division 1 Part 2 of Defamation Legislation Amendment Act 2025
Defamation Act 2006 47
(c) one or more of the other causes of action in the proceedings
accrued before the commencement date (a
pre-commencement action); and
(d) the post-commencement action accrued no later than
12 months after the date on which the earliest
pre-commencement action in the proceedings accrued.
(3) The existing law of defamation continues to apply to the following
causes of action in the same way as it would have applied to those
causes of action had this Act not been enacted:
(a) any cause of action that accrued before the commencement
date;
(b) any post-commencement action to which the other provisions
of this Act do not apply because of subsection (2).
(4) In this section:
existing law of defamation means the law (including all relevant
statutory provisions and principles and rules of the general law) that
applied in this jurisdiction to the determination of civil liability for the
publication of defamatory matter immediately before the
commencement date.
46 References to repealed Act
In an Act or document, a reference to the repealed Act or a
provision of that Act may, if the context permits, be taken to be a
reference to this Act or the corresponding provision of this Act.
Part 7 Transitional matters for Defamation Legislation
Amendment Act 2025
Division 1 Part 2 of Defamation Legislation Amendment
Act 2025
47 Application of amendments
An amendment made to this Act by Part 2 of the Defamation
Legislation Amendment Act 2025 applies only in relation to the
publication of defamatory matter after the commencement of the
amendment.
Part 7 Transitional matters for Defamation Legislation Amendment Act 2025
Division 2 Part 3, Division 2 of Defamation Legislation Amendment Act 2025
Defamation Act 2006 48
Division 2 Part 3, Division 2 of Defamation Legislation
Amendment Act 2025
48 Interpretation
(1) In this Division:
amending Act means the Defamation Legislation Amendment
Act 2025.
commencement means the commencement of Part 3, Division 2 of
the amending Act.
post-commencement action means a cause of action for the
publication of defamatory matter accruing after the commencement.
pre-commencement action means a cause of action for the
publication of defamatory matter accruing before the
commencement.
(2) In this Division, a reference to an amendment of this Act or to the
commencement of a provision of this Act includes a reference to
any definition inserted by section 32 of the amending Act used in
the relevant amendment or provision.
49 Application of digital intermediary amendments
Part 2, Division 2A and section 29A do not apply to a
post-commencement action if:
(a) the post-commencement action is one of 2 or more causes of
action in a proceeding commenced by a plaintiff; and
(b) each cause of action in the proceeding accrues because of
the publication of the same, or substantially the same, matter
on separate occasions, whether by the same defendant or
another defendant; and
(c) one or more of the other causes of action in the proceeding
are pre-commencement actions; and
(d) the post-commencement action accrued no later than
12 months after the date on which the earliest
pre-commencement action in the proceeding accrued.
Part 7 Transitional matters for Defamation Legislation Amendment Act 2025
Division 3 Part 3, Division 3 of Defamation Legislation Amendment Act 2025
Defamation Act 2006 49
50 Application of offers amendments
The amendments to section 14 by the amending Act apply to any
offer to make amends made after the commencement, including an
offer to make amends that relates to a publication before the
commencement.
51 Application of preliminary discovery or non-party digital
intermediary order amendments
(1) Sections 20A and 36A apply to the making of an order after the
commencement, including if the proceeding in which the order is
made:
(a) involves a pre-commencement action; or
(b) was commenced before the commencement.
(2) Sections 20A and 36A do not apply to the variation or revocation of
an order that was made before the commencement.
52 Application of document giving or service amendments
The amendments to section 41 by the amending Act apply to the
giving or service of notices or other documents after the
commencement even if the notices or other documents relate:
(a) to a pre-commencement action; or
(b) to a proceeding commenced before the commencement.
Division 3 Part 3, Division 3 of Defamation Legislation
Amendment Act 2025
53 Application of absolute privilege amendments
(1) Section 24, as in force immediately before the commencement of
the amending Division, continues to apply in respect of a
pre-commencement action despite the amendments to that section
by the amending Division.
(2) In this section:
amending Division means Part 3, Division 3 of the Defamation
Legislation Amendment Act 2025.
pre-commencement action, in relation to the amending Division,
means a cause of action for the publication of defamatory matter
accruing before the commencement of the amending Division.
Schedule 1 Additional publications to which absolute privilege applies
Defamation Act 2006 50
Schedule 1 Additional publications to which absolute
privilege applies
section 24(2)(d)
Note for Schedule 1:
Currently there are no provisions in this Schedule but it has been included for
consistency with the national model provisions.
Schedule 2 Additional kinds of public documents
Defamation Act 2006 51
Schedule 2 Additional kinds of public documents
section 25(4)
definition of public document, paragraph (g)
Note for Schedule 2:
Currently there are no provisions in this Schedule but it has been included for
consistency with the national model provisions.
Schedule 3 Additional proceedings of public concern
Defamation Act 2006 52
Schedule 3 Additional proceedings of public concern
section 26(4)
definition of proceedings of public concern, paragraph (p)
Note for Schedule 3:
Currently there are no provisions in this Schedule but it has been included for
consistency with the national model provisions.
Schedule 4 Acts repealed
Defamation Act 2006 53
Schedule 4 Acts repealed
section 44
Defamation Ordinance 1938 Ordinance No. 10 of 1938
Defamation Ordinance 1963 Ordinance No. 76 of 1963
Defamation Ordinance 1964 Ordinance No. 51 of 1964
Defamation Amendment Act 1989 Act No. 49 of 1989
ENDNOTES
Defamation Act 2006 54
ENDNOTES
1 KEY Key to abbreviations
amd = amended od = order
app = appendix om = omitted
bl = by-law pt = Part
ch = Chapter r = regulation/rule
cl = clause rem = remainder
div = Division renum = renumbered
exp = expires/expired rep = repealed
f = forms s = section
Gaz = Gazette sch = Schedule
hdg = heading sdiv = Subdivision
ins = inserted SL = Subordinate Legislation
lt = long title sub = substituted
nc = not commenced
2 LIST OF LEGISLATION
Defamation Act 2006 (Act No. 8, 2006)
Assent date 26 April 2006
Commenced 26 April 2006
Defamation Legislation Amendment Act 2025 (Act No. 20, 2025)
Assent date 10 August 2025
Commenced 11 August 2025 (s 2)
3 GENERAL AMENDMENTS
General amendments of a formal nature (which are not referred to in the table
of amendments to this reprint) are made by the Interpretation Legislation
Amendment Act 2018 (Act No. 22, 2018) to: s 1.
4 LIST OF AMENDMENTS
s 3 amd No. 20, 2025, ss 4 and 32
s 8 amd No. 20, 2025, s 5
s 9 amd No. 20, 2025, s 6
s 9A ins No. 20, 2025, s 7
pt 2
div 2A hdg ins No. 20, 2025, s 33
ss 9B – 9E ins No. 20, 2025, s 33
pt 3
div 1 hdg amd No. 20, 2025, s 8
ss 11A – 11B ins No. 20, 2025, s 9
s 13 amd No. 20, 2025, s 10
s 14 amd No. 20, 2025, ss 11 and 34
s 17 amd No. 20, 2025, s 12
s 20 sub No. 20, 2025, s 13
s 20A ins No. 20, 2025, s 35
ENDNOTES
Defamation Act 2006 55
s 23 sub No. 20, 2025, s 14
s 24 amd No. 20, 2025, s 40
s 26A ins No. 20, 2025, s 15
s 27 amd No. 20, 2025, s 16
s 27A ins No. 20, 2025, s 17
s 28 amd No. 20, 2025, s 18
s 28A ins No. 20, 2025, s 36
s 30 rep No. 20, 2025, s 19
s 32 amd No. 20, 2025, s 20
s 36A ins No. 20, 2025, s 37
s 41 amd No. 20, 2025, ss 21 and 38
pt 7 hdg exp No. 8, 2006, s 56
ins No. 20, 2025, s 22
pt 7
div 1 hdg exp No. 8, 2006, s 56
ins No. 20, 2025, s 22
s 47 exp No. 8, 2006, s 47(4)
ins No. 20, 2025, s 22
pt 7
div 2 hdg exp No. 8, 2006, s 56
ins No. 20, 2025, s 39
ss 48 – 52 exp No. 8, 2006, s 56
ins No. 20, 2025, s 39
pt 7
div 3 hdg exp No. 8, 2006, s 56
ins No. 20, 2025, s 41
s 53 exp No. 8, 2006, s 56
ins No. 20, 2025, s 41
ss 54 – 55 exp No. 8, 2006, s 56
s 56 exp No. 8, 2006, s 56