QLDIn ForceAct
Criminal Proceeds Confiscation Act 2002
sec.93ZLWhen Supreme Court may exclude prescribed respondent’s property
Start here
Get a plain-English read of sec.93ZL
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Criminal Proceeds Confiscation Act 2002.
### sec.93ZL When Supreme Court may exclude prescribed respondent’s property
The Supreme Court may exclude the prescribed respondent’s property from the restraining order if it is satisfied it is in the public interest to amend the order in the particular circumstances.
The Supreme Court may require the prescribed respondent to give security satisfactory to the court to meet any liability that may be imposed on the prescribed respondent under this Act.
s 93ZL ins 2013 No. 21 s 42
(sec.93ZL-ssec.1) The Supreme Court may exclude the prescribed respondent’s property from the restraining order if it is satisfied it is in the public interest to amend the order in the particular circumstances.
(sec.93ZL-ssec.2) The Supreme Court may require the prescribed respondent to give security satisfactory to the court to meet any liability that may be imposed on the prescribed respondent under this Act.