QLDIn ForceAct
Criminal Proceeds Confiscation Act 2002
sec.89SMaking of hardship order
Start here
Get a plain-English read of sec.89S
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Criminal Proceeds Confiscation Act 2002.
### sec.89S Making of hardship order
The Supreme Court may, on an application under section 89Q , make an order ( hardship order ) excluding special property from the operation of an order under section 89N (4) or a charge under section 89O if it is satisfied—
the applicant is a dependant of the person against whom the unexplained wealth order was made; and
the operation of the order under section 89N (4) or charge under section 89O will cause hardship to the dependant.
However, the court must not make a hardship order in favour of an adult dependant of the person against whom an unexplained wealth order was made unless the court is satisfied the dependant had no knowledge of the serious crime related activity which formed the basis of the unexplained wealth order.
In this section—
special property means—
any property, if the last change of ownership resulted from the death of someone other than the person against whom the unexplained wealth order was made; or
property given under a will
property that is or was the dependant’s principal place of residence, if—
the last change of ownership of the property was at least 6 years before the serious crime related activity which formed the basis of the unexplained wealth order started happening; and
the property was occupied by the dependant as his or her principal place of residence for a consecutive period of 2 years during the 6-year period mentioned in subparagraph (i) .
s 89S ins 2013 No. 21 s 40
(sec.89S-ssec.1) The Supreme Court may, on an application under section 89Q , make an order ( hardship order ) excluding special property from the operation of an order under section 89N (4) or a charge under section 89O if it is satisfied— the applicant is a dependant of the person against whom the unexplained wealth order was made; and the operation of the order under section 89N (4) or charge under section 89O will cause hardship to the dependant.
(sec.89S-ssec.2) However, the court must not make a hardship order in favour of an adult dependant of the person against whom an unexplained wealth order was made unless the court is satisfied the dependant had no knowledge of the serious crime related activity which formed the basis of the unexplained wealth order.
(sec.89S-ssec.3) In this section— special property means— any property, if the last change of ownership resulted from the death of someone other than the person against whom the unexplained wealth order was made; or property given under a will property that is or was the dependant’s principal place of residence, if— the last change of ownership of the property was at least 6 years before the serious crime related activity which formed the basis of the unexplained wealth order started happening; and the property was occupied by the dependant as his or her principal place of residence for a consecutive period of 2 years during the 6-year period mentioned in subparagraph (i) .
- (a) the applicant is a dependant of the person against whom the unexplained wealth order was made; and
- (b) the operation of the order under section 89N (4) or charge under section 89O will cause hardship to the dependant.
- (a) any property, if the last change of ownership resulted from the death of someone other than the person against whom the unexplained wealth order was made; or Example— property given under a will
- (b) property that is or was the dependant’s principal place of residence, if— (i) the last change of ownership of the property was at least 6 years before the serious crime related activity which formed the basis of the unexplained wealth order started happening; and (ii) the property was occupied by the dependant as his or her principal place of residence for a consecutive period of 2 years during the 6-year period mentioned in subparagraph (i) .
- (i) the last change of ownership of the property was at least 6 years before the serious crime related activity which formed the basis of the unexplained wealth order started happening; and
- (ii) the property was occupied by the dependant as his or her principal place of residence for a consecutive period of 2 years during the 6-year period mentioned in subparagraph (i) .
- (i) the last change of ownership of the property was at least 6 years before the serious crime related activity which formed the basis of the unexplained wealth order started happening; and
- (ii) the property was occupied by the dependant as his or her principal place of residence for a consecutive period of 2 years during the 6-year period mentioned in subparagraph (i) .