QLDIn ForceAct
Criminal Proceeds Confiscation Act 2002
sec.67When Supreme Court may give leave for s 66
Start here
Get a plain-English read of sec.67
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Criminal Proceeds Confiscation Act 2002.
### sec.67 When Supreme Court may give leave for s 66
The Supreme Court may give leave to apply for an exclusion order after the end of the 6 months mentioned in section 66 (2) (a) if it is satisfied the delay in applying was not because of the applicant’s neglect.
Also, the Supreme Court may give a person mentioned in section 66 (2) (b) leave to apply for an exclusion order only if it considers there are special grounds, including, for example—
for a good reason, the person did not attend the hearing of the application for the forfeiture order even though the person had notice of it; or
particular evidence proposed to be presented by the person in the application was not available to the person when the application for the forfeiture order was heard.
(sec.67-ssec.1) The Supreme Court may give leave to apply for an exclusion order after the end of the 6 months mentioned in section 66 (2) (a) if it is satisfied the delay in applying was not because of the applicant’s neglect.
(sec.67-ssec.2) Also, the Supreme Court may give a person mentioned in section 66 (2) (b) leave to apply for an exclusion order only if it considers there are special grounds, including, for example— for a good reason, the person did not attend the hearing of the application for the forfeiture order even though the person had notice of it; or particular evidence proposed to be presented by the person in the application was not available to the person when the application for the forfeiture order was heard.
- (a) for a good reason, the person did not attend the hearing of the application for the forfeiture order even though the person had notice of it; or
- (b) particular evidence proposed to be presented by the person in the application was not available to the person when the application for the forfeiture order was heard.