QLDIn ForceAct
Criminal Proceeds Confiscation Act 2002
sec.65Exclusion of property from forfeiture order application
Start here
Get a plain-English read of sec.65
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Criminal Proceeds Confiscation Act 2002.
### sec.65 Exclusion of property from forfeiture order application
This section applies if an application for a forfeiture order has been made but the application has not been decided.
A person, including a prescribed respondent, who claims an interest in property to which the application relates may apply to the Supreme Court for an exclusion order.
The applicant must give a written notice of the making of the application, the grounds for the application and the facts relied on to the State and anyone else who has an interest in the property.
The grounds for the application and the facts relied on must be stated fully in the notice.
The State must be a party to the application.
Anyone else who is given notice of the application may appear at the hearing of the application.
If the State proposes to oppose the application, the State must give the applicant notice of intention to oppose the application.
The State must give the applicant notice of the grounds for opposing the application.
However—
the State is not required to give the notice; and
the application may not be heard;
until the DPP has had a reasonable opportunity to examine the applicant or a relevant person under an examination order, whether or not an examination order has already been made.
In this section—
relevant person means a person other than the applicant who, on examination under an examination order, may be able to give evidence relevant to the application for the exclusion order.
s 65 amd 2009 No. 2 s 26
(sec.65-ssec.1) This section applies if an application for a forfeiture order has been made but the application has not been decided.
(sec.65-ssec.2) A person, including a prescribed respondent, who claims an interest in property to which the application relates may apply to the Supreme Court for an exclusion order.
(sec.65-ssec.3) The applicant must give a written notice of the making of the application, the grounds for the application and the facts relied on to the State and anyone else who has an interest in the property.
(sec.65-ssec.3A) The grounds for the application and the facts relied on must be stated fully in the notice.
(sec.65-ssec.4) The State must be a party to the application.
(sec.65-ssec.5) Anyone else who is given notice of the application may appear at the hearing of the application.
(sec.65-ssec.6) If the State proposes to oppose the application, the State must give the applicant notice of intention to oppose the application.
(sec.65-ssec.7) The State must give the applicant notice of the grounds for opposing the application.
(sec.65-ssec.8) However— the State is not required to give the notice; and the application may not be heard; until the DPP has had a reasonable opportunity to examine the applicant or a relevant person under an examination order, whether or not an examination order has already been made.
(sec.65-ssec.9) In this section— relevant person means a person other than the applicant who, on examination under an examination order, may be able to give evidence relevant to the application for the exclusion order.
- (a) the State is not required to give the notice; and
- (b) the application may not be heard;