sec.119Particular requirements for affidavit relating to relevant property that is not prescribed respondent’s property

### sec.119 Particular requirements for affidavit relating to relevant property that is not prescribed respondent’s property This section applies only if a police officer’s affidavit relates to property of someone other than the prescribed respondent. This section is in addition to section 118 . If the relevant offence is a major drug offence, the police officer’s affidavit must state— the police officer suspects that the property is tainted property and the reason for the suspicion; or the police officer suspects that the property is under the prescribed respondent’s effective control and the reason for the suspicion. If the relevant offence is not a major drug offence, the police officer’s affidavit must state— the police officer suspects that the property is tainted property and the reason for the suspicion; or the police officer— suspects that the property is under the prescribed respondent’s effective control; and suspects that the prescribed respondent derived a benefit from the commission of the offence; and the reason for the suspicion. s 119 amd 2013 No. 21 s 44 (sec.119-ssec.1) This section applies only if a police officer’s affidavit relates to property of someone other than the prescribed respondent. (sec.119-ssec.2) This section is in addition to section 118 . (sec.119-ssec.3) If the relevant offence is a major drug offence, the police officer’s affidavit must state— the police officer suspects that the property is tainted property and the reason for the suspicion; or the police officer suspects that the property is under the prescribed respondent’s effective control and the reason for the suspicion. (sec.119-ssec.4) If the relevant offence is not a major drug offence, the police officer’s affidavit must state— the police officer suspects that the property is tainted property and the reason for the suspicion; or the police officer— suspects that the property is under the prescribed respondent’s effective control; and suspects that the prescribed respondent derived a benefit from the commission of the offence; and the reason for the suspicion. - (a) the police officer suspects that the property is tainted property and the reason for the suspicion; or - (b) the police officer suspects that the property is under the prescribed respondent’s effective control and the reason for the suspicion. - (a) the police officer suspects that the property is tainted property and the reason for the suspicion; or - (b) the police officer— (i) suspects that the property is under the prescribed respondent’s effective control; and (ii) suspects that the prescribed respondent derived a benefit from the commission of the offence; and (iii) the reason for the suspicion. - (i) suspects that the property is under the prescribed respondent’s effective control; and - (ii) suspects that the prescribed respondent derived a benefit from the commission of the offence; and - (iii) the reason for the suspicion. - (i) suspects that the property is under the prescribed respondent’s effective control; and - (ii) suspects that the prescribed respondent derived a benefit from the commission of the offence; and - (iii) the reason for the suspicion.