sch.1-sec.6Example 3

### sch.1-sec.6 Example 3 A is convicted of the confiscation offence of official corruption. A gave B, an officer of the public service, a race horse valued at $150,000 for B to destroy an official file. Because of the destruction of the file, A was able to have A’s lawfully acquired land rezoned. Before the rezoning the land was valued at $200,000. After the rezoning the land was valued at $1m. The race horse is derived by B from the commission of the confiscation offence of official corruption. The race horse is tainted property under section 104 (1) (a) or (c) . If the land is sold by A for $1m, $800,000 is tainted property under section 104 (1) (c) . sch 1 s 6 amd 2010 No. 42 s 214 sch (sch.1-sec.6-ssec.1) A is convicted of the confiscation offence of official corruption. (sch.1-sec.6-ssec.2) A gave B, an officer of the public service, a race horse valued at $150,000 for B to destroy an official file. (sch.1-sec.6-ssec.3) Because of the destruction of the file, A was able to have A’s lawfully acquired land rezoned. (sch.1-sec.6-ssec.4) Before the rezoning the land was valued at $200,000. After the rezoning the land was valued at $1m. (sch.1-sec.6-ssec.5) The race horse is derived by B from the commission of the confiscation offence of official corruption. (sch.1-sec.6-ssec.6) The race horse is tainted property under section 104 (1) (a) or (c) . (sch.1-sec.6-ssec.7) If the land is sold by A for $1m, $800,000 is tainted property under section 104 (1) (c) .