275CCourt may direct expert evidence be given concurrently or consecutively

#### 275C Court may direct expert evidence be given concurrently or consecutively 275C Court may direct expert evidence be given concurrently or consecutively > > (1) The court may, at any time, give directions as it considers appropriate to enable the giving of expert evidence concurrently or consecutively in criminal proceedings. > > > (2) Directions under this section may include the following— > > > > > (a) a direction that an expert witness give evidence at any stage of the proceedings, > > > > > (b) a direction that more than one expert witness give evidence at the same time in the proceedings, > > > > > (c) a direction that an expert witness give an oral exposition of the witness’s opinion on a particular matter, > > > > > (d) a direction that an expert witness be examined, cross-examined or re-examined in a particular manner or sequence, including by putting to each expert witness, in turn, each question relevant to one matter or issue at a time, > > > > > (e) a direction that an expert witness be permitted to ask questions of another expert witness who is giving evidence at the same time during the proceedings. > > > (3) A direction may be given under this section only with the consent of the prosecutor and the accused person. > > > (4) This section does not limit any other powers of a court to give directions in relation to evidence, witnesses or the management and conduct of proceedings. > > **s 275C:** Ins 2018 No 87, Sch 1.15 \[4\].