117Limit on circumstances when costs may be awarded against a public officer

#### 117 Limit on circumstances when costs may be awarded against a public officer 117 Limit on circumstances when costs may be awarded against a public officer > > (1) Professional costs are not to be awarded in favour of an accused person in any committal proceedings unless the Judge is satisfied as to any one or more of the following— > > > > > (a) that the investigation into the alleged offence was conducted in an unreasonable or improper manner, > > > > > (b) that the proceedings were initiated without reasonable cause or in bad faith or were conducted by the prosecutor in an improper manner, > > > > > (c) that the prosecution unreasonably failed to investigate (or to investigate properly) any relevant matter of which it was aware or ought reasonably to have been aware and which suggested either that the accused person might not be guilty or that, for any other reason, the proceedings should not have been brought, > > > > > (d) that, because of other exceptional circumstances relating to the conduct of the proceedings by the prosecutor, it is just and reasonable to award costs. > > > (2) This section does not apply to the awarding of costs against a prosecutor acting in a private capacity. > > > (3) In this section— > > > > professional costs means costs (other than court costs) relating to professional expenses and disbursements (including witnesses’ expenses) in respect of proceedings before a Judge. > > **s 117:** Ins 2001 No 119, Sch 1 \[43\]. Am 2025 No 61, Sch 2.31\[9\].