ACTIn ForceAct
Confiscation of Criminal Assets Act 2003
37Payment of living and business expenses from restrained
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 37
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Confiscation of Criminal Assets Act 2003.
37 Payment of living and business expenses from restrained
(1) A relevant court may, in a restraining order or an order under
section 39 (Additional orders about restraining orders and restrained
property) varying a restraining order, allow any of the following
expenses to be met out of the restrained property of a person, or a
stated part of the property:
(a) the living and business expenses of the person (other than the
person’s legal expenses in defending a criminal charge);
(b) the living expenses of a dependant of the person.
Note 1 For legal expenses in defending a criminal charge, see s 38.
Note 2 For the meaning of dependant, see dict.
(2) However, the court must not allow expenses to be met out of
restrained property unless—
(a) the person satisfies the court that—
(i) the expenses are reasonable; and
(ii) the expenses are necessary to avoid undue hardship to the
person or the person’s dependants; and
(iii) the expenses cannot be met out of property of the person
not subject to a restraining order; and
(b) the court is satisfied that any property to be released from
restraint for the expenses does not have evidentiary value in any
criminal proceeding; and
(c) if the restrained property includes tainted property—the court is
(i) the tainted property is not required to meet the expenses;
or
(ii) if the tainted property is required to meet the expenses—it
is just and equitable for the tainted property to meet the
expenses.
(3) When deciding whether expenses are reasonable, or necessary to
avoid undue hardship, the court must take into account that—
(a) a person should be able to—
(i) satisfy the person’s essential physical and psychological
needs; and
(ii) have a minimum standard of living that is neither meagre
nor luxurious; and
(iii) participate in the life of the person’s community; and
(iv) have nutritious food, access to transport or personal
transportation, appropriate clothing for the place where the
person lives, furniture and essential appliances; and
(v) have equipment to participate in ordinary leisure activities;
and
(b) the purpose of allowing living and business expenses is not to
avoid every hardship but only undue hardship to the person or
the person’s dependants.
(4) When determining undue hardship, the court must as far as
practicable having regard to the minimum standard of living
mentioned in subsection (3) (a) (ii), not take into account hardship
arising from the loss of a previous standard of living to the extent that
the previous standard of living was likely to have been the result of
the commission of an offence, a material advantage derived from an
offence or unexplained wealth.
(5) For subsection (2) (b), the court must assume the property does not
have evidentiary value unless the contrary is proved.
(6) A regulation may—
(a) prescribe matters to which the court may, must or must not have
regard for subsection (2) (a) (i) or (ii); and
(b) prescribe, or make provision in relation to, the maximum
amount of living or business expenses of a person that may be
allowed (for a period or otherwise).
(7) A regulation made for this section may apply, adopt or incorporate
(with or without change) a provision of a law of the Commonwealth
or a State, or an instrument, as in force from time to time.
Note 1 The text of an applied, adopted or incorporated law or instrument,
whether applied as in force from time to time or at a particular time, is
taken to be a notifiable instrument if the operation of the Legislation Act,
s 47 (5) or (6) is not disapplied (see s 47 (7)).
Note 2 A notifiable instrument must be notified under the Legislation Act.