//
© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the official source for authoritative text.
New South Wales act
This Act sets out how "common carriers by land" (carriers who carry goods for hire) can limit their legal responsibility for loss or damage to certain kinds of goods, and the steps carriers and senders must follow if the sender wants the carrier to accept liability above a default low amount. It replaces an earlier Act listed in the First Schedule (see Schedule 1).
Mechanics (how it works):
Who is covered: "Common carrier" in this Act means a common carrier by land (s 3). The Act governs carriage of parcels/packages delivered for hire or to accompany a passenger (s 4).
Default liability cap for certain goods: For the items listed in Schedule 2 (for example: coins, precious metals, jewellery, watches, paintings, certain papers and other listed items), a carrier is not liable for loss or injury to those items in a parcel or package if their value exceeds $20 unless the sender declares the nature and value when delivering the parcel (s 4; Schedule 2).
Declaring value and paying more: If the sender declares a value above $20, the carrier may require an increased charge to cover the additional risk (s 5(1)). Those increased rates must be posted in a public and conspicuous place at the carrier's receiving office (s 5(2)–(3)).
Receipts and refund if formalities not followed: If the increased charge is paid (or an engagement to pay is accepted), the person receiving payment must, if required, sign a receipt acknowledging the parcel as insured. If the receipt is not given when required, or the required notice has not been posted, the carrier loses the statutory protections and is liable at common law; the carrier must also refund any increased charge paid (s 6).
Want the full deep dive?
Zoe can write the in-depth analysis on top of the summary above: how it works, who it affects and what each part actually does.
Direct links to the current provisions in Common Carriers Act 1902.
Zoe has indexed the source text for search and analysis. Use the official register for the original document and download formats.
View on official registerSourced from legislation.nsw.gov.au, CC BY 4.0.
Notices cannot shrink liability for items not covered by this Act: A carrier’s public notice cannot validly limit common-law liability for items not covered by the Act; carriers remain liable at common law for items where the Act does not grant a benefit (s 7).
Receiving offices and suing carriers: Any office/warehouse used by a carrier for receiving parcels is treated as that carrier’s receiving-house; one or more carriers can be sued in the carrier name(s) only; actions do not fail merely because a co-proprietor or partner was not joined as a defendant (s 8).
Carrier responsibility for neglect/default and limits for animals: Carriers are liable for loss or injury caused by their or their servants’ neglect or default despite any contrary notice (s 9). The section allows some qualifications:
No protection for unlawful acts or personal negligence of servants: The Act does not shield carriers from liability for loss caused by an unlawful act of an employee, nor does it shield the employee from personal liability for their own neglect or misconduct (s 10).
Proof of value in claims: A declaration of value is not conclusive; a claimant must prove actual value by ordinary legal evidence, and damages are limited to the proved value (not exceeding the declared value) (s 11).
Purpose statements (as claimed by the statute) and practical implications
The Act’s operational purpose is to set a default low liability for certain high-risk or high-value item classes while allowing carriers and senders to contract for higher coverage if the sender (a) declares value and (b) pays or agrees to pay an increased charge (s 4–6, s 9(b); Schedule 2).
Who pays: The sender decides whether to declare a higher value and, if so, pays the increased charge (s 4–6, s 9(b)). If they do not declare, they bear the risk above $20 for goods in Schedule 2 (s 4).
Who decides: Carriers decide whether to demand an increased rate and set the amount, but must publicly post rates at the receiving-house (s 5). Courts decide on the reasonableness of conditions the carrier imposes (s 9(a)) and adjudicate disputes about liability and proof of value (s 11).
Costs, incentives and trade-offs (mechanisms, not judgments):
Risk allocation and pricing: By permitting carriers to limit liability for listed goods to $20 unless value is declared, the Act reduces carriers’ open-ended exposure to loss for those goods (s 4). That reduction in exposure creates an incentive for carriers to accept such parcels at lower baseline charges but to require higher charges for declared higher-value items (s 5(1)).
Administrative and compliance burdens: Carriers must affix legible notices of increased rates at receiving locations (s 5(2)). They must issue receipts acknowledging insurance when required and refund increased charges if formalities are not met (s 6). Senders must understand and use the declaration procedure to obtain higher coverage (s 4–6). These steps create record-keeping and display obligations for carriers and an action/decision cost for senders.
Contract freedom and formalities: The Act preserves a sender’s right to limit contractual variations: special contracts changing liability are ineffective unless signed by the sender (s 9(c)). This raises the transaction cost of altering standard liability rules and protects senders from unsigned fine-print limitations.
Enforcement and evidentiary issues: Claimants must prove actual value by ordinary legal evidence (s 11). This places evidentiary burdens on claimants and can create disputes over valuation. Carriers who fail to follow notice/receipt formalities lose the Act’s protections and revert to common-law liability (s 6, s 7).
Employee misconduct and unlawful acts: The Act does not shield carriers or employees from liability for unlawful acts or personal negligence (s 10). That preserves a route for liability notwithstanding statutory limits.
Distributional effects and risks identifiable from the text
Concentrated benefit: The statutory default limitation provides a direct reduction in carriers’ potential losses for listed items unless senders declare higher value (s 4). That is a concentrated benefit to carriers when senders do not declare.
Diffuse cost: Individual senders who do not declare higher value bear the loss above $20 for those listed goods (s 4). The decision to declare shifts cost to the sender via the increased charge (s 5–6, s 9(b)).
Discretion and oversight: Carriers have discretion to set increased rates and to accept or demand engagement to pay; the requirement to post rates (s 5(2)) and courts’ role in adjudicating reasonableness (s 9(a)) are statutory constraints and oversight mechanisms.
Implementation risk and likely friction points
Key fixed numerical rules in the Act
Bottom line (neutral): The Act creates a structured default rule that limits carriers’ exposure for certain listed goods to $20 unless the sender follows a declared-value-and-payment procedure; it requires notices and receipts to enforce that arrangement, preserves common-law liability where statutory protection does not apply, requires proof of actual value in claims, and leaves courts to police reasonableness where carriers impose delivery/forwarding conditions (s 3–11; Schedules 1–3).