Coastal Waters (State Title) Act 1980

The Act directly affects the six Australian States (New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia, Western Australia and Tasmania). Because s.3(2)(a) provides that a reference to a State is to be read as a reference to the Crown in right of the State, the beneficiaries are the State governments acting in their sovereign capacity rather than the State parliaments or instrumentalities.

The Commonwealth is both a beneficiary of the savings provisions and a party whose pre-existing rights are limited. Section 4(2)(a) extinguishes any Commonwealth title that rested solely on the sovereignty declared in the Seas and Submerged Lands Act 1973. At the same time, the Commonwealth retains the specific rights enumerated in s.4(2)(b) and (c) and the international responsibilities preserved by s.6. Authorities of the Commonwealth, defined broadly in s.3(1) to include bodies established by Commonwealth law and companies wholly owned by the Commonwealth, are likewise protected in respect of the rights in s.4(2)(b).

Private persons or companies who held rights or titles in the sea-bed immediately before commencement are protected by s.4(2)(a). The Act does not disturb existing leases, licences or other interests granted by either the Commonwealth or the States before the commencement date.

The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority is indirectly affected through the qualification in s.4(3). Any person or company proposing to construct pipelines for petroleum recovered beyond the coastal waters must obtain Commonwealth authorisation under s.4(2)(c).

Because s.4(4) ties the vesting to the baseline of the territorial sea, hydrographic surveyors, the Australian Hydrographic Service and any Commonwealth or State agency responsible for maritime boundary definition are affected whenever a baseline change occurs. Finally, the Minister administering the Act (currently the Attorney-General) holds the power under s.5 to fix the deferred vesting date for occupied areas by Gazette notice.

The Act creates no ongoing regulatory duties in the conventional sense; it is a title-conferring statute. The primary right conferred is the proprietary title vested by s.4(1). Once vested, that title carries with it the ordinary incidents of ownership subject only to the exceptions in s.4(2) and (3). Section 4(5) expressly contemplates that the State may dispose of or deal with the title under its own laws.

The States acquire the right to explore for and exploit minerals (including petroleum) in the subsoil (s.3(2)(b)), to authorise the placement of structures on the sea-bed, and to regulate activities in the superjacent waters to the extent that such regulation is not inconsistent with the reserved Commonwealth rights.

The Commonwealth's rights are set out in s.4(2)(b) and (c). These are not mere reservations; they are positive rights to use the sea-bed and to authorise pipeline construction. The right in s.4(2)(b) is exercisable by the Commonwealth itself or by any authority of the Commonwealth authorised by the Commonwealth or by a Commonwealth law.

Section 6 preserves the Commonwealth's international rights and duties, including the right and obligation to ensure observance of the innocent passage regime. This is framed as a limitation on the effect of the Act rather than as a duty imposed on the States, but it necessarily implies that State activities must not interfere with the Commonwealth's ability to discharge those international obligations.

Section 7 extends the operation of the Commonwealth Places (Application of Laws) Act 1970 so that Commonwealth criminal and civil laws continue to apply to Commonwealth places in coastal waters as if those places were inside the State. This creates a practical right for the Commonwealth to enforce its laws in those enclaves.

The Act imposes no positive duties on States to exercise the title in any particular way, nor does it require the Commonwealth to exercise its reserved rights. The only procedural obligation is the Minister's power under s.5 to publish a Gazette notice before the vesting can take effect in occupied areas.

The Coastal Waters (State Title) Act 1980 contains no offence provisions, no penalty units and no enforcement machinery of its own. It is not a regulatory statute but a conveyancing statute that operates by force of law. Disputes about the extent or effect of the title vested would fall to be determined in the ordinary way by the Federal Court or the High Court under the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) or by State Supreme Courts exercising federal jurisdiction.

Because title is vested "by force of this Act", any attempt by a State to deal with an area beyond the coastal waters as defined would simply be ineffective under s.4(4)(b). Conversely, any Commonwealth attempt to assert title extinguished by s.4(2)(a) would fail because the Act itself has removed that title.

Enforcement of the reserved rights in s.4(2)(b) and (c) would occur through whatever Commonwealth legislation authorises the particular activity (for example, defence legislation, navigation legislation or the Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Act 2006 (Cth) for pipelines). The Act itself supplies the underlying proprietary foundation but does not create its own sanctions.

The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Act 1975, to which the title is subject under s.4(3), does contain its own offence and enforcement regime; the present Act simply ensures that the exercise of powers under that regime cannot be challenged as an infringement of State title.

The Act is expressly designed to sit alongside the Coastal Waters (State Powers) Act 1980. While the Title Act vests proprietary rights, the Powers Act extends the legislative competence of the States to the coastal waters. The two statutes must be read together to understand the full Offshore Constitutional Settlement.

The Seas and Submerged Lands Act 1973 is the key statute whose effect is modified. That Act had asserted Commonwealth sovereignty over the territorial sea and sovereign rights over the continental shelf. Section 4(2)(a) of the present Act ensures that any Commonwealth title that existed solely by reason of that sovereignty is not preserved once the new title is vested in the State.

The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Act 1975 is given paramount operation by s.4(3). The definition in s.4(6) makes clear that amendments to that Act after 1980 continue to qualify the State's title within the Region.

The Commonwealth Places (Application of Laws) Act 1970 is modified by s.7 so that it applies to Commonwealth places in coastal waters as if they were inside the State. This interaction prevents a jurisdictional vacuum in areas such as defence bases or lighthouses that remain under Commonwealth control.

The Act also interacts with the Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Act 2006 (Cth) and its predecessors. The pipeline right in s.4(2)(c) contemplates that petroleum recovered under Commonwealth law beyond the coastal waters may be transported across State title land.

At the international level, s.6 preserves the operation of the Convention on the Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone and any other binding international agreements. This ensures that the vesting of title does not alter Australia's maritime boundaries or its obligations under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.

State mining and petroleum legislation now operates on the basis of the title conferred by this Act. For example, Queensland and Western Australian legislation authorising offshore mining tenements relies on the State having received the underlying title under s.4(1).

The text of the Act as set out reflects its original 1980 structure with only minor updating. The most significant "change" mechanism built into the Act is the ambulatory baseline rule in s.4(4). Whenever Australia adjusts the baseline from which the territorial sea is measured (for example, because of new hydrographic surveys or the declaration of new straight baselines), the vesting automatically adjusts. If coastal waters expand, the new area is vested on the date of the change; if they contract, the State's title to the lost area ceases. This mechanism has been used on several occasions when Australia updated its territorial sea baselines, most notably after the enactment of the Seas and Submerged Lands (Territorial Sea) Proclamation 2006.

Section 4(6) incorporates amendments to the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Act 1975 "as amended from time to time". This ambulatory reference has allowed subsequent expansions of the Marine Park and changes to its zoning to continue to qualify State title without the need to amend the 1980 Act.

No substantive amendments have been made to the core vesting or exception provisions since 1980. The Act has proved remarkably stable because it was drafted as a constitutional settlement rather than ordinary regulatory legislation. The few changes that have occurred have been technical, reflecting updates to cross-referenced statutes or adjustments to the definition of "authority of the Commonwealth" to take account of changes in government business enterprise structures.

The reason for this stability is that the Act forms part of a political and legal compromise that has held for more than four decades. Any major amendment would risk reopening the delicate balance struck between Commonwealth and State interests in 1980.

The text of the Act itself does not record any specific court challenges, but it was enacted against the background of the High Court's decision upholding the Seas and Submerged Lands Act 1973. That background is reflected in the careful drafting of s.4(2)(a), which extinguishes Commonwealth title that "may have subsisted by reason only of the sovereignty referred to in the Seas and Submerged Lands Act 1973".

Controversies that have arisen in practice have tended to concern the precise location of the baseline and therefore the outer limit of "coastal waters". Because the vesting is tied to the baseline, any dispute about where the baseline lies directly affects the area over which the State holds title under this Act. Such disputes have usually been resolved by negotiation or by the declaration of new baselines rather than by litigation.

Another area of practical controversy has been the interaction between State title and the reserved Commonwealth rights in s.4(2)(b). Questions have arisen about the precise scope of "purposes in relation to communications, the safety of navigation, quarantine or defence". For example, the extent to which a State may regulate the construction of a navigation aid that the Commonwealth wishes to place on the sea-bed has been a matter of ongoing administrative negotiation.

The qualification in s.4(3) concerning the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park has generated controversy in Queensland about the respective roles of the State and the Commonwealth in managing activities that are both inside and outside the Marine Park. Because the State's title is expressly "subject to the operation" of that Act, Commonwealth zoning decisions can override State approvals, leading to disputes about consultation and compensation.

Section 5's deferred vesting mechanism for occupied areas has occasionally produced administrative delays while the Minister determines an appropriate date, giving rise to short-term uncertainty about title.

No challenge has successfully impugned the constitutional validity of the Act. Its validity rests on the Commonwealth's power to make laws with respect to external affairs and to acquire or dispose of property, combined with the cooperative federalism that underpinned the Offshore Constitutional Settlement.

Most practitioners assume that once title is vested under s.4(1) the State can deal with the area exactly as it deals with onshore land. The "gotcha" is the ambulatory baseline rule in s.4(4)(b): if a baseline change causes an area to fall outside coastal waters, the State title conferred by this Act simply disappears without compensation. The title is not indefeasible; it is contingent on the continuing location of the baseline.

Another trap is the breadth of the definition of "authority of the Commonwealth" in s.3(1). It catches any Commonwealth-owned company that holds more than 50% of the voting power. Many commercial joint ventures that appear to be private entities are in fact "authorities" for the purposes of the reserved rights in s.4(2)(b).

The reference in s.4(6) to the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Act 1975 "as amended from time to time" means that future amendments can further qualify State title without any amendment to this Act. A State mining lease granted in the Region can therefore be rendered subject to new Commonwealth restrictions years after it is issued.

Section 4(2)(c) preserves a Commonwealth right to authorise pipelines only for petroleum "recovered, in accordance with a law of the Commonwealth, from any area of the sea-bed beyond the coastal waters". Gas or minerals recovered under State authority cannot use the statutory pipeline corridor; a separate State authorisation is required. Many pipeline proponents have fallen into this distinction.

The savings provision in s.8(b) is easily overlooked. The Act does not derogate from any pre-existing State rights. In some cases States have argued that they already possessed title at common law and that the Act merely confirmed it. The better view, grounded in the text, is that the Act is the source of the new statutory title and that s.8(b) preserves only those rights that existed independently before 1980.

Finally, the Minister's power under s.5 to fix a later vesting date for occupied areas is not a formality. Until the Gazette notice is published, the Commonwealth or its authority continues to hold the pre-existing title. There is no statutory time limit on when the Minister must act, creating the theoretical possibility of indefinite delay.

Compliance for a State government involves two main steps. First, ensure that any dealing with the sea-bed or superjacent space is confined to the area that currently constitutes "coastal waters" under the baseline in force at the relevant time. Regular liaison with the Australian Hydrographic Service is essential to track baseline changes that automatically expand or contract the title under s.4(4).

Second, when granting titles or authorisations, expressly acknowledge the reserved rights in s.4(2). Standard clauses should be included in State leases or licences noting that the grant is subject to Commonwealth rights for defence, navigation, communications, quarantine and authorised pipelines. Failure to do so does not remove the Commonwealth rights, but it reduces the risk of later administrative conflict.

For Commonwealth agencies, compliance requires that any exercise of the reserved rights in s.4(2)(b) or (c) be properly authorised either by the Commonwealth itself or by a law of the Commonwealth. The right is not a general warrant; it must be tied to one of the enumerated purposes.

Private operators should obtain title searches or written confirmation from the relevant State department that the area in question is within coastal waters and that no pre-existing third-party rights under s.4(2)(a) survive. When constructing infrastructure, operators must identify whether the proposed activity falls within a reserved Commonwealth purpose; if it does, a separate Commonwealth approval will be required even though the underlying title is held by the State.

In the Great Barrier Reef Region, proponents must comply with both State and Commonwealth approval processes. The qualification in s.4(3) means that a State approval cannot override a prohibition or condition imposed under the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Act 1975.

Lawyers drafting agreements should include clauses that address the possibility of baseline change under s.4(4). Material adverse change provisions should specifically contemplate the automatic loss of title if an area ceases to be within coastal waters.

Finally, any proposed amendment to State legislation that affects the sea-bed should be checked against s.4(5). The State may deal with the title under its own laws only "subject to subsections (2) and (3)". Legislation that purports to override the reserved Commonwealth rights will be ineffective to that extent.

Regular training for in-house counsel in both State and Commonwealth maritime agencies on the precise interaction between this Act, the Coastal Waters (State Powers) Act 1980 and the Seas and Submerged Lands Act 1973 remains the most cost-effective compliance measure. The statutory language has remained stable for more than forty years; the boundaries and the exceptions, however, continue to require careful mapping in every transaction.