QLDIn ForceAct
Coal Mining Safety and Health Act 1999
sec.240Hearing procedures
Start here
Get a plain-English read of sec.240
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Coal Mining Safety and Health Act 1999.
### sec.240 Hearing procedures
Unless this division otherwise provides, the practice and procedure for the appeal are to be in accordance with the rules of court or, if the rules make no provision or insufficient provision, in accordance with the directions of the court.
An appeal must be by way of rehearing, unaffected by the original decision-maker’s decision.
However, for deciding an appeal against a decision of the CEO under section 267I to impose a civil penalty on a corporation, information that was not available to the CEO in making the decision must not be taken into account.
In deciding an appeal, an Industrial Magistrates Court—
is not bound by the rules of evidence; and
must observe natural justice.
In this section—
original decision-maker means the Minister, CEO or the board of examiners.
s 240 amd 2018 No. 28 s 39 ; 2020 No. 10 s 139 sch 2
(sec.240-ssec.1) Unless this division otherwise provides, the practice and procedure for the appeal are to be in accordance with the rules of court or, if the rules make no provision or insufficient provision, in accordance with the directions of the court.
(sec.240-ssec.2) An appeal must be by way of rehearing, unaffected by the original decision-maker’s decision.
(sec.240-ssec.3) However, for deciding an appeal against a decision of the CEO under section 267I to impose a civil penalty on a corporation, information that was not available to the CEO in making the decision must not be taken into account.
(sec.240-ssec.4) In deciding an appeal, an Industrial Magistrates Court— is not bound by the rules of evidence; and must observe natural justice.
(sec.240-ssec.5) In this section— original decision-maker means the Minister, CEO or the board of examiners.
- (a) is not bound by the rules of evidence; and
- (b) must observe natural justice.