SAIn ForceAct
Civil Liability Act 1936
Div 3Assumption of risk
Start here
Get a plain-English read of Div 3
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Civil Liability Act 1936.
Division 3—Assumption of risk
36—Meaning of obvious risk
(1) For the purposes of this Division, an obvious risk to a person who suffers harm is a risk that, in the circumstances, would have been obvious to a reasonable person in the position of that person.
(2) Obvious risks include risks that are patent or matters of common knowledge.
(3) A risk may be obvious even though it is of low probability.
37—Injured persons presumed to be aware of obvious risks
(1) If, in an action for damages for negligence, a defence of voluntary assumption of risk (volenti non fit injuria) is raised by the defendant and the risk is an obvious risk, the plaintiff is taken to have been aware of the risk unless the plaintiff proves, on the balance of probabilities, that he or she was not actually aware of the risk.
(2) For the purposes of this section, a person is aware of a risk if the person is aware of the type or kind of risk, even if the person is not aware of the precise nature, extent or manner of occurrence of the risk.
(3) However, in order to establish a defence of voluntary assumption of risk, it is necessary to establish that the risk was such that a reasonable person in the plaintiff's position would have taken steps (which the plaintiff did not in fact take) to avoid it.
38—No duty to warn of obvious risk
(1) A person (the defendant) does not owe a duty of care to another person (the plaintiff) to warn of an obvious risk to the plaintiff.
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply if—
(a) the plaintiff has requested advice or information about the risk from the defendant; or
(b) the defendant is required to warn the plaintiff of the risk by a written law; or
(c) the risk is a risk of death or of personal injury to the plaintiff from the provision of a health care service by the defendant.
(3) Subsection (2) does not give rise to a presumption of a duty to warn of a risk in the circumstances referred to in that subsection.
39—No liability for materialisation of inherent risk
(1) A person is not liable in negligence for harm suffered by another person as a result of the materialisation of an inherent risk.
(2) An inherent risk is a risk of something occurring that cannot be avoided by the exercise of reasonable care and skill.
(3) This section does not operate to exclude liability in connection with a duty to warn of a risk.