QLDIn ForceAct
Child Protection (Offender Reporting and Offender Prohibition Order) Act 2004
sec.67HApplication for internal review
Start here
Get a plain-English read of sec.67H
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Child Protection (Offender Reporting and Offender Prohibition Order) Act 2004.
### sec.67H Application for internal review
The reportable offender may apply to the police commissioner for an internal review of the decision.
However, if the application is for an internal review of a decision to place on the register information that a person is a reportable offender who has been convicted of a device inspection offence, the application may only be made on the grounds that—
the device inspection offence the reportable offender has been convicted of is a relevant offence; and
a decision that the person committed the offence using an electronic communication network or digital device has been made in error.
The application must—
be in writing; and
state the grounds on which the reportable offender seeks the review of the decision; and
be made within 28 days after the reportable offender receives written notice of the decision.
However, the police commissioner may at any time extend the time for making the application.
In this section—
relevant offence means an offence mentioned in the Police Powers and Responsibilities Act 2000 , section 21B (5) , definition device inspection offence —
paragraph (b) or (d) ; or
paragraph (f) that, if the offence had been committed in Queensland, would have constituted an offence mentioned in paragraph (b) or (d) of that definition.
s 67H ins 2014 No. 34 s 27
amd 2023 No. 21 s 30
(sec.67H-ssec.1) The reportable offender may apply to the police commissioner for an internal review of the decision.
(sec.67H-ssec.2) However, if the application is for an internal review of a decision to place on the register information that a person is a reportable offender who has been convicted of a device inspection offence, the application may only be made on the grounds that— the device inspection offence the reportable offender has been convicted of is a relevant offence; and a decision that the person committed the offence using an electronic communication network or digital device has been made in error.
(sec.67H-ssec.3) The application must— be in writing; and state the grounds on which the reportable offender seeks the review of the decision; and be made within 28 days after the reportable offender receives written notice of the decision.
(sec.67H-ssec.4) However, the police commissioner may at any time extend the time for making the application.
(sec.67H-ssec.5) In this section— relevant offence means an offence mentioned in the Police Powers and Responsibilities Act 2000 , section 21B (5) , definition device inspection offence — paragraph (b) or (d) ; or paragraph (f) that, if the offence had been committed in Queensland, would have constituted an offence mentioned in paragraph (b) or (d) of that definition.
- (a) the device inspection offence the reportable offender has been convicted of is a relevant offence; and
- (b) a decision that the person committed the offence using an electronic communication network or digital device has been made in error.
- (a) be in writing; and
- (b) state the grounds on which the reportable offender seeks the review of the decision; and
- (c) be made within 28 days after the reportable offender receives written notice of the decision.
- (a) paragraph (b) or (d) ; or
- (b) paragraph (f) that, if the offence had been committed in Queensland, would have constituted an offence mentioned in paragraph (b) or (d) of that definition.