CTHRepealedAct
Bounty (Machine Tools and Robots) Act 1985
22Variation of inadequate claims
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 22
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Bounty (Machine Tools and Robots) Act 1985.
#### 22 Variation of inadequate claims
(1) Where a person who has lodged a claim under section 21 (whether or not the claim has been dealt with under subsection 21(3)) considers that the claim was, by reason of an inadvertent error, a claim for an amount of bounty in respect of bountiable equipment that was less than the amount of bounty that the person was entitled to claim in respect of that equipment, the person may lodge a claim for payment to the person of the difference between the 2 amounts.
(2) A claim under subsection (1) in respect of bountiable equipment shall:
(a) be in accordance with the appropriate approved form;
(b) include such information as is, and such estimates as are, required by the form;
(c) be signed and witnessed as required by the form; and
(d) be lodged with a Collector for a State or Territory, or with the CEO, within 12 months after the day on which the condition specified in subsection 16(5) or (6) or paragraph 16(8)(e) or (f), as the case requires, was complied with in respect of the bountiable equipment.
(3) Where a claim under subsection (1) relates to a claim under section 21 that has not been dealt with under subsection 21(3), the 2 claims shall be dealt with under subsection 21(3) as if they were one claim under section 21.
(4) As soon as practicable after the lodgment of a claim under subsection (1) to which subsection (3) does not apply, the CEO shall, after examining the claim and causing such inquiries as the CEO considers necessary to be made (including inquiries under sections 32 and 33):
(a) if the CEO is satisfied that the claim complies with subsection (2) and that the claimant is, or, if certain estimates are correct, is, otherwise entitled to be paid an additional amount of bounty in respect of bountiable equipment to which the claim relates—approve, in writing, payment of the additional amount; or
(b) if the CEO is not so satisfied—refuse, in writing, to approve payment of an additional amount of bounty in respect of the equipment to which the claim relates.
(5) Where the CEO makes a decision under subsection (4) in relation to a claim approving, or refusing to approve, payment of an additional amount of bounty, not being a decision made within 30 days after the lodging of the claim and approving payment of the additional amount claimed, the CEO shall cause to be served on the person who lodged the claim, a notice in writing setting out the decision.