CTHRepealedLegislation
Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Regulations 1999
66Review of decisions by CEO
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 66
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Regulations 1999.
#### 66 Review of decisions by CEO
(1) A controlled person who is affected by a decision of the CEO to refuse to make a declaration under subregulation 4(3), 6(3), 37(1), 38(3), 38(5) or 38(6) may request that the Minister reconsider the CEO’s decision.
(2) The request must be:
(a) in writing; and
(b) given to the Minister within 28 days after the making of the decision.
(3) The Minister must reconsider the CEO’s decision and confirm, vary or set aside the decision.
> Note: Under section 27A of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975, the Minister must give, to any person whose interests are affected by the decision, notice, in writing or otherwise, of the making of the decision and of the person’s right to have the decision reviewed. In giving that notice, the Minister must have regard to the Code of Practice determined under section 27B of that Act (Gazette No. S 432, 7 December 1994) and available at [http://www.comlaw.gov.au](http://www.comlaw.gov.au) (registration number F2006B11660).
(4) The Minister is taken to have confirmed the CEO’s decision under subregulation (3) if the Minister does not give written notice of the Minister’s decision under that subregulation within 60 days after the request is received.
(5) Application may be made to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal for review of a decision of the Minister under subregulation (3) to confirm, vary or set aside the CEO’s decision.