CTHRepealedLegislation
Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Regulations 1999
6Prescribed radiation facility
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 6
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Regulations 1999.
#### 6 Prescribed radiation facility
(1) For the definition of prescribed radiation facility in section 13 of the Act, the following facilities and installations are prescribed:
(a) a particle accelerator that:
(i) has, or is capable of having, a beam energy greater than 1 MeV; or
(ii) can produce neutrons;
(b) an irradiator that contains more than 1015 Bq of a controlled material;
(c) an irradiator that contains more than 1013 Bq but not more than 1015 Bq of a controlled material and:
(i) does not include shielding as an integral part of its construction; or
(ii) if it does include shielding as an integral part of its construction—the shielding does not prevent a person from being exposed to the source; or
(iii) if it does include shielding as an integral part of its construction—has a source that is not inside shielding during the operation of the irradiator;
(d) a facility (other than a nuclear installation) used for the production, processing, use, storage, management or disposal of:
(i) unsealed sources for which the result worked out using the steps mentioned in subregulation (2) is greater than 106; or
(ii) sealed sources for which the result worked out using the steps mentioned in subregulation (2) is greater than 109.
> Note: A prescribed radiation facility is a controlled facility, see the definition of controlled facility in section 13 of the Act.
(2) For subparagraphs (1)(d)(i) and (ii), the steps are:
(a) divide the activity of each nuclide in the sources by the activity value mentioned in an item in the table in clause 2 of Schedule 2 for the nuclide; and
(b) if there is more than 1 nuclide in the sources—add the result for each nuclide worked out under paragraph (a).
(3) However, the CEO may declare, in writing, on a case by case basis, that a facility is not a prescribed radiation facility.
> Note: A decision to refuse to make a declaration is reviewable under regulation 66.
(3A) The CEO must not make a declaration under subregulation (3) unless the CEO is satisfied that:
(a) the facility does not pose an unacceptable potential hazard to the health and safety of people or to the environment; and
(b) it would be inappropriate, in all the circumstances, for the facility to be a prescribed radiation facility.
(4) The CEO must publish the declaration in the Gazette as soon as practicable after making it.