© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the official source for authoritative text.
Commonwealth legislation
This instrument lists specific activities, organisations and kinds of work that are "specified" for the purposes of the Australian Citizenship Act 2007 sections referenced in this instrument (see cl.5–7). It is made under section 22C of the Act (cl.2A). Concretely:
It identifies particular activities and the organisations linked to them (clause 5 and the table in clause 5). Examples include employment requiring a Negative Vetting 2 or higher security clearance in a Commonwealth department or agency (cl.5, item 1), participation in Australian teams at the Olympic or Paralympic Games (cl.5, items 2–3), selected international tennis, Commonwealth Games and specified international cricket matches (cl.5, items 4–6).
It specifies particular "kinds of work" that are captured under the Act (clause 6). Examples include on-duty work by ship or aircraft crew (cl.6(2)(a)), work on a resources or sea installation (cl.6(2)(b)), senior executive roles in S&P/ASX 200 companies (cl.6(2)(c)), certain R&D roles by doctorate-qualified academics or scientists employed by Australian universities (cl.6(2)(d)), scientists employed by CSIRO or member medical research institutes (cl.6(2)(e)), medical specialists with internationally recognised records who meet specified fellowship/qualification criteria (cl.6(2)(f)), and work in academia/research, the arts, a profession or sport done by current or former primary holders of certain talent visas granted for internationally recognised achievement (cl.6(3)).
Want the full deep dive?
Zoe can write the in-depth analysis on top of the summary above: how it works, who it affects and what each part actually does.
Direct links to the current provisions in Australian Citizenship (special residence requirement) Instrument (LIN 21/069) 2021.
Zoe has indexed the source text for search and analysis. Use the official register for the original document and download formats.
View on official registerSourced from the Federal Register of Legislation (legislation.gov.au), CC BY 4.0.
It explicitly specifies the work of ministers of religion in senior leadership positions and lists the sorts of duties that are included (clause 7).
The instrument defines key terms used in those lists (clause 3), including the definition of a "relevant talent visa", and references to external lists (for example, the S&P/ASX All Australia 200 list and the ICC).
It also states that amendments made by a later instrument (LIN 26/024) will apply to citizenship applications made on or after that later instrument’s commencement day (clause 8).
Individuals who apply for Australian citizenship and who claim that their residence or work falls within the specified activities or kinds of work listed here will be affected, because those activities and jobs are the categories treated under the cited provisions of the Act (see cl.5–7 and cl.2A).
The instrument also directs attention to particular organisations (for verification or context) such as the Australian Olympic Committee, Cricket Australia, CSIRO, and S&P/ASX All Australia 200 companies (cl.5; cl.6(2)(e); cl.3).
Employers and employers’ representatives may be affected to the extent applicants need employer documentation or verification to show they performed the specified work (see cl.5–7 and cl.3 definitions).
The immediate legal effect is procedural/mechanical: the instrument defines what counts as a "specified" activity or kind of work under sections of the Citizenship Act referenced (cl.5–7). That matters because those specifications change which applicants can rely on the special residence provisions of the Act (the instrument is made under s.22C — cl.2A). The instrument itself does not set out the broader policy objective in this text; it provides the categories the decision-maker will treat as falling within the Act’s special residence rules.
Testing that practical effect against costs, incentives and implementation trade-offs (source-grounded):
Concentrated benefits and who gains: the instrument explicitly includes narrowly defined, high-status or high-skill roles (for example, CEOs or executive managers of S&P/ASX 200 companies (cl.6(2)(c)), doctorate-level academics/scientists employed by Australian universities (cl.6(2)(d)), elite athletes representing Australia in specified competitions (cl.5 items 2–6), and medical specialists meeting international-fellowship criteria (cl.6(2)(f))). Those categories will be the direct beneficiaries if the Act’s special residence provisions operate in their favour for applicants in those roles (see cl.5–7).
Compliance burden on applicants: an applicant relying on these specifications will need to show documentary proof that their activity or work fits a listed category (for example, evidence of participation in a named event/organisation (cl.5), proof of employment in a specified post or employer (cl.6(2)(c)–(e)), or evidence of visa history and the basis of the visa grant (cl.3 definition of "relevant talent visa")). The instrument’s reliance on external lists and specific dates (for visa classes in cl.3 and the S&P/ASX 200 list referenced in cl.3 Note 2) implies administrative steps to verify eligibility.
Administrative discretion and interpretive points: several terms in the instrument require factual or evaluative assessment by the administering authority. Examples include "requires a Negative Vetting 2 or higher security clearance" (cl.5, item 1), "internationally recognised record of exceptional and outstanding achievement" (cl.6(2)(f) and cl.6(3)), and membership of the S&P/ASX All Australia 200 (cl.3 Note 2). These invite factual verification and judgment by officials when processing applications.
Reliance on external standards and bodies: the instrument ties specification to external organisations and lists (for example, ICC events and Cricket Australia for cricket (cl.5, item 6), the S&P/ASX 200 list (cl.3 Note 2), CSIRO and the Association of Australian Medical Research Institutes (cl.6(2)(e))). That creates operational dependencies for verification and can produce timing issues (e.g. the S&P/ASX index being rebalanced quarterly — cl.3 Note 2).
Timing and transitional effect: the instrument explicitly provides that later amendments made by LIN 26/024 apply to citizenship applications made on or after LIN 26/024’s commencement (cl.8). That creates a clear temporal cut-off for which version of the specification applies to a given application.
Who decides: the Department (the decision-maker under the Citizenship Act) applies these specifications when deciding whether an applicant’s activity/work falls into the listed categories (the instrument provides the list; the Act and departmental processes govern decision-making — see cl.2A and cl.5–7).
Who bears costs: applicants seeking to rely on these categories will bear the evidence-gathering and administrative compliance costs (documentary proof, potentially arranging employer or organisational confirmations) because the instrument defines categories but does not by itself undertake verification (see cl.5–7 and cl.3). Employers or named organisations may bear some cost if asked to provide confirmations.
The instrument is a categories list rather than a rulebook: it lists named activities and roles; many qualifying phrases are inherently factual or evaluative (e.g. "internationally recognised record", security clearance levels, or membership of the ASX 200), which requires case-by-case verification (see cl.5, cl.6(2)(f), cl.6(3), cl.3 Note 2).
Some categories are precisely linked to named organisations or external events (Olympics, Commonwealth Games, ICC events — cl.5 items 2, 3, 5, 6). Others are occupation/skill based but tied to qualifications or employers (PhD-holding academics at Australian universities — cl.6(2)(d); CSIRO employees — cl.6(2)(e)). That mix creates straightforward verification for some applicants and more discretionary assessments for others.
The instrument anticipates future change by cross-referencing an amending instrument (LIN 26/024) and setting a commencement condition for its application (cl.8). The instrument does not itself describe the content of those amendments.
Source citations: clauses 2A, 3, 5–8.