© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the official source for authoritative text.
Commonwealth legislation
This Act has been repealed and is no longer in force. It is retained for historical reference.
What these regulations do (mechanically)
Define the instrument and a key term: “Act” refers to the A New Tax System (Wine Equalisation Tax) Act 1999; “purchaser” means a person who has borne wine tax on wine they bought (1‑1.03).
Set the rules for the tourist refund scheme for wine purchases (Division 25). A purchaser may be eligible for a refund of wine tax on wine they bought if three conditions drawn from the GST regulations are met: the purchase meets the acquisition requirements in Subdivision 168‑A of the GST Regulations; the purchaser leaves the indirect tax zone in the circumstances in Subdivision 168‑B; and the wine is exported in the circumstances in Subdivision 168‑C or 168‑D. The subdivision does not apply where the wine was partly consumed before the purchaser left the indirect tax zone (25‑5.02).
Prescribe the formula used to work out the refundable amount of wine tax: 29% of half of the GST‑inclusive price paid by the purchaser (25‑5.03).
Set practical cash‑payment rules for refunds: if the cash amount to be paid to the purchaser is not an exact multiple of 5 cents, it must be rounded to the nearest 5 cents, with amounts exactly at 2.5 cents rounded up (25‑5.04(1)). The regulations also make the purchase of wine subject to the payment/administration arrangements in Subdivisions 168‑F and 168‑G of the GST Regulations (25‑5.04(2)).
Define composition and labelling thresholds that determine what counts as grape wine, grape wine product, fruit/vegetable wine and mead for the purposes of the Act (Division 31):
Want the full deep dive?
Zoe can write the in-depth analysis on top of the summary above: how it works, who it affects and what each part actually does.
Direct links to the current provisions in A New Tax System (Wine Equalisation Tax) Regulations 2000.
Zoe has indexed the source text for search and analysis. Use the official register for the original document and download formats.
View on official registerSourced from the Federal Register of Legislation (legislation.gov.au), CC BY 4.0.
Preserve earlier tourist‑refund rules for wine exported before the commencement of Schedule 2 to the Treasury Laws Amendment (GST) Regulations 2019 (34‑1.01).
Who pays, who receives and who decides (mechanics and incentives)
Mechanically, the purchaser initially bears the wine tax (definition of purchaser, 1‑1.03). Under the tourist refund rules, a proportion of that tax can be paid back (refund) to the purchaser if the statutory export and acquisition conditions are met (25‑5.01 to 25‑5.04).
The refundable amount is a fixed formula dependent on the GST‑inclusive price the purchaser paid (25‑5.03). That ties the refund to retail pricing and the GST component rather than to producer costs or volumes.
Practical cash handling is constrained by rounding rules (25‑5.04(1)), which can alter the refund by a few cents in individual transactions.
Compliance burdens, administrative links and discretion
The tourist refund eligibility tests rely on cross‑references to the GST Regulations (Subdivision 168‑A, 168‑B, 168‑C, 168‑D, 168‑F and 168‑G). Users and administrators must apply those GST rules alongside these Regulations to determine eligibility (25‑5.02; 25‑5.04(2)). That creates a compliance dependency: meeting these rules requires familiarity with and records that satisfy both sets of regulations.
Producers and sellers face objective, measurable composition thresholds for product classification (31‑2.01; 31‑3.01; 31‑4.01; 31‑6.01). Meeting those thresholds will typically require record‑keeping and measurements (e.g. ABV testing, batch records, ingredient origin and timings for additions). Those obligations are set out in measurable terms rather than as open‑ended discretion.
Discretion in the Regulations themselves is limited: most requirements are expressed as fixed percentages, prohibitions (e.g. no non‑wine alcoholic flavouring for grape wine products, 31‑3.01(2)), or cross‑references to specified GST provisions. The regulations rely on the Act and the GST Regulations for enforcement and administrative process.
Trade‑offs, incentives and likely behavioural effects (source‑grounded)
The refund formula (25‑5.03) and the tourist refund conditions (25‑5.02) create a direct incentive for purchasers who will export wine (e.g. travellers) to buy wine that qualifies under the GST acquisition and export rules: the purchaser recovers part of the tax they bore. The regulations do not set retail prices but affect post‑purchase net cost for qualifying purchasers.
Because product classification is prescribed (Division 31), producers must ensure beverages meet those technical definitions to obtain the associated tax treatment and to avoid misclassification. That produces a compliance and possibly a testing or labelling cost for producers, particularly where formulation is near the percentage thresholds.
The rounding rule (25‑5.04(1)) imposes an extremely small per‑transaction transfer (at most a few cents) either way as a mechanical effect of cash payments.
Transitional effect
Why it matters (claimed purpose and an implementation check)
The Regulations implement detailed mechanics for calculating and paying tourist refunds of wine tax and for classifying types of wine and similar beverages for tax treatment. The explanatory note in 25‑5.01 links these rules to eligibility under the Act’s tourist refund scheme. That claimed purpose (enabling refunds for qualifying exported purchases) is implemented by: (a) specifying eligible purchases via cross‑references to GST acquisition and export rules (25‑5.02); (b) prescribing the refund amount formula (25‑5.03); and (c) setting payment rounding and administrative arrangements (25‑5.04).
The implementation trade‑offs visible in the text are: cross‑regulation complexity (dependence on GST Regulations increases compliance overhead (25‑5.02; 25‑5.04(2)); objective composition thresholds reduce administrative discretion but increase measurement and record‑keeping needs for producers (31‑2.01; 31‑3.01; 31‑4.01; 31‑6.01); and transitional protection for earlier exports limits retrospective application (34‑1.01).