(original emphasis)
Consideration of Agreement and Draft Determination
7 In considering whether it is appropriate to make the orders that the parties seek, I have had the benefit of an affidavit of the late Father Warria filed on 6 March 2001. I have also had the benefit of an anthropological report prepared on behalf of the applicants in July 2000 by Dr Julie Lahn, anthropologist, and filed on 19 November 2004. Dr Lahn is presently working as a postdoctoral fellow at the Australian National University. In the past she has worked as a consultant anthropologist while living among the people of the Torres Strait.
8 Dr Lahn explains in her report that the people of Aureed Island were a mobile group that moved between neighbouring islands while maintaining a connection with the determination area. The term Kulkalgal is often used to express relatedness, which strengthens existing geographical, cultural and social ties. Within this wider Kulkalgal group, there are smaller sub-groups of which the present claimant group is one.
9 There are pre-annexation recordings of the presence of Islanders at Aureed. The three main sources are those relating to the Charles Eaton affair in 1836, MacFarlane's missionary travels in the Ellengowan during 1874 and Haddon's brief but important passage and genealogical information relating to Aureed in 1935. Dr Lahn notes that the first two events are important in that they record the presence of Islanders on Aureed before and shortly after annexation, and the third makes clear reference to some individuals who are connected to the place.
10 The Kulkalgal sub-group have maintained a physical connection to Aureed. People hunt, fish and forage when visiting the place. Rights to Aureed have been exercised since annexation. Ongoing physical connection arising from such rights have been uninterrupted and claimants have continued to visit and utilise Aureed for fishing, hunting, picnicking and trawling.
11 Like other central islands, Aureed has a number of named places, some of which are sites of social activity and mythological activity (story places), and others which are ecological features.
12 Indeed, the continuing connection between the Kulkalgal and the determination area is well recognised. Father Warria had deposed in support of the Kulkalgal's native title rights over the determination area:
'4. The traditional land owners have an acknowledged system of traditional laws and customs which they have observed and continue to observe relating to, among other things, land ownership. These laws and customs determine who are the rightful owners of particular parcels of land, how such ownership may rightfully pass from one person to another and collectively recognise the continuing traditional associations with the claim area of the Kulkulgal people.
5. In support of some of the rights included as part of the continuing traditional inheritance of Kulkulgal people and therefore as part of their native title rights, I confirm that:
(a) Kulkulgal people have always enjoyed, and continue to enjoy, their rights to use, occupy and live on their land and to exclude others from it and to use and enjoy the natural resources of the land such as animal and plant life. For example, my family and I frequently visit the Aureed to hunt for turtle, collect turtle eggs,
(b) Kulkulgal people leave their land to their children and others in accordance with their tradition and custom and grant and withhold permission for others to use their land. For example, my family will inherit my land on Aureed when I die.
(c) Kulkulgal people hunt over the land, forage the land, garden the land and generally use the resources of the land albeit in somewhat changing ways over the years. For example, members of my family often collect turtle eggs from Aureed.
(d) Kulkulgal people trade and share in their natural resources amongst themselves and trade with others including Papuans, other Torres Strait Islanders and non-indigenous persons.
(e) Kulkulgal people conduct social, religious and economic activities upon the claim area including the visiting of cultural sites of significance, conducting burials and tomb stone openings, participating in festivals and associated traditional dancing and being responsible on a daily basis for the care of the land. For example, I sometimes visit sites of cultural significance at Aureed, and I visit the graves of my ancestors at Aureed.'
13 I accept the evidence contained in Father Warria's affidavit and the opinions contained in Dr Lahn's report. I am satisfied that:
(a) native title exists in relation to the lands and waters identified in the draft determination agreed to by the parties;
(b) the members of the claimant group referred to as the Kulkalgal are members of a society of peoples descended from the Torres Strait Islander peoples who as a society at the time of sovereignty occupied the lands and waters identified in the draft determination in accordance with traditional laws and customs acknowledged and observed by them;
(c) the laws and customs acknowledged and observed by the society at sovereignty are continued to be acknowledged and observed by the members of the claim group and have been acknowledged and observed by their predecessors from the time of sovereignty to the present time;
(d) the members of the claim group and their predecessors through their continued acknowledgement and observance of the traditional laws and customs which existed at the time of sovereignty, have maintained since that time a connection to the determination area;
(e) the native title rights and interests in the determination area are held by the persons who are or are entitled to be or become members of the claim group called the Kulkalgal; and
(f) the nature and extent of the exclusive and non-exclusive native title rights and interests in relation to the determination area are as set out in the agreed draft determination.
14 I am also satisfied on the materials that there are other interests in and in relation to the determination area. Those interests and their relationship with the native title interests are set out in Schedule 3 of the agreed draft determination.
Orders and Determinations
15 The proposed Orders, which are consistent with the terms agreed by the parties, recognise that the Kulkalgal, as the common law holders of the native title, are entitled to possess, occupy, use and enjoy the land and waters of the determination area, in accordance with their traditional laws and customs. The proposed Orders also recognise the other interests in the lands and waters in the determination area and the relationship of those interests with the native title interests. The proposed Order contains the elements required by s 94A and s 225 of the Act.
16 I am satisfied that it is within the power of the Court to make the Orders sought and that these Orders can appropriately be made to give effect to the parties' agreement without a full hearing of the determination application. I therefore make the Orders and determination attached as the Appendix to these reasons.
I certify that the preceding sixteen (16) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Cooper.