REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
1 Before the Court are two applications for native title determinations. In proceeding QUD 84 of 2004, Terrance Taylor and Jacky Green (the "Applicant") claim on behalf of the Gangalidda People and the Garawa People. The Gangalidda People are all of the descendants of the following people:
Greg Thompson, Sophie Thompson, Ernest Thompson, Walter Thompson, Jimmy, Dawudawu Jimmy (King), Grant, George Nark Mirrabaliyajari, Bob Scoles Gunyarbadijarri, Lirrgagujarri, Bob Weber Milgalajarri, Maggie (or Minnie), Kitty, Kitty Wulnanda, Kitty Lirrgagujarri, Dolly, Old Nim, Stumpy Paddy, Mickey Charles, Barny Guldangara, Limilimilda, Johnny Balawayinda, Daisy Lirrgawanjinda, Sandy, Gunalumbu, Ngarilgudu, Malurgudu, Myrna Malalairunanda, Didmanja, Sandy, Garruwala and Charly (Gundirrirri/Ngarrguyumbu/Gulawi),
who identify, and are identified by other Gangalidda People, as belonging to the Gangalidda People according to Gangalidda traditional laws and customs.
The term "descendants" includes those individuals who have been adopted by the Gangalidda People.
The Garawa People are all of the descendants of the following people:
Dixon Yiliwagu, Murdering Tommy Mayarwagu, Dick Gawardalagayi, Mardu, "Strike-a-light" Yalagu, Bindi Bindi, Illibarra (or Yilibarra), Charley Marrgarranyi, Violet Man.gali, Dildol Charley Lujunguynyi, Gandiyari, Jangurungurama, Wirrangala, Gurrunggumaji, Banjiramaji (Bob) Yellow Jack, Gabugabumanyi Jack, Wanjirrigama Sandy, Dirrdungga, Baramalinya Bandaguyi, Wambilangunu, Dunggula, Yalbindirri, Topsy Landurimara, Jack Boy Walbungga, Paul Gayjbalala, Tobacco Jack, Ned Bamalurri, Old Rory Mawulawula (Buraji), Bamy (Barney) Barrgudugudu, Jack Calvert, Masterton Jack, Wudungkamarra, Thalmarrurrkimara, Karringamaji (King Peter), Widalamara, Malarrkudu (Kabajuju) (Barramundi Billy), Dukala, Rukulamara, Albert Doomadgee, Ned Doomadgee, Kukurrinya (Yabiwayngka), Jack Nadinku, Nukuthu, Minnie Munjanagurru, Waguwiganda, Jangulamarra, Gilmajarri (or Landilimarra) and Willy Murrandoo,
who identify, and are identified by other Garawa People, as belonging to the Garawa People in accordance with Garawa traditional laws and customs.
The term "descendants" includes those individuals who have been adopted by the Garawa People.
2 In proceeding QUD 66 of 2005, Terrance Taylor and Jacky Green (the "Applicant"), claim on behalf of the Gangalidda People and the Garawa People, who are described in the same way as in QUD 84 of 2004.
3 The claim areas are contiguous and are in the southern Gulf of Carpentaria region of north-west Queensland, close to the Queensland/Northern Territory border. QUD 84 of 2004 claims approximately 706 square kms of land and water, including parts of Wentworth Pastoral Holding, a small western portion of Troutbeck Pastoral Holding and part of Westmoreland Pastoral Holding. The north-eastern corner of the claim area extends to the High Water Mark, commencing west of Massacre Inlet.
4 QUD 66 of 2005 covers an area of approximately 8,643 square kms of land and water. The north-western corner of the claim area extends five nautical miles seaward of the High Water Mark. The eastern boundary of the claim area commences on the coast at the Leichhardt River. Part of the southern boundary includes the Nicholson River. Other major rivers that flow through the claim area are the Albert and Gregory Rivers. The claim area predominantly covers, either wholly or in part, 15 pastoral holdings namely:
Yarrum;
Turn Off Lagoons;
Lawn Hill;
Westmoreland;
Wentworth;
Almora;
Armraynald;
Beamesbrook;
Birkalla;
Nierrana;
Little Doab;
Doab;
Brinawa;
Kotupna; and
Punjaub.
QUD 66 of 2005 also claims:
(a) reserves and unallocated State land;
(b) part of the Doomadgee Deed of Grant in Trust;
(c) areas of unallocated State land;
(d) land and waters on the seaward side of the High Water Mark, predominantly between the Queensland/Northern Territory border and Massacre Inlet;
(e) estuarine areas, including the lower reaches of Johns Creek in the locality of Tarrant Point; and
(f) part of Finucane Island National Park.
The Gangalidda People have been recognized as traditional owners of other areas in the region. I need not complicate these reasons by detailed references to those determinations.
5 The present respondents to QUD 84 of 2004 are:
State of Queensland;
Burke Shire Council;
Carpentaria Land Council Aboriginal Corporation;
Telstra Corporation Limited;
Panoy Pty Ltd; and
Westmoreland Pastoral Company Pty Ltd.
6 The present respondents to QUD 66 of 2005 are:
State of Queensland;
Commonwealth of Australia;
Burke Shire Council;
Doomadgee Aboriginal Shire Council;
Ergon Energy Corporation Limited;
Telstra Corporation Limited;
John Leonard Clarke;
Norman Leonard Clarke;
Susan Maree Clarke;
Judith Anne Goodall;
Janice Nelson;
John Geoffrey Nelson;
Panoy Pty Ltd;
Paraway Pastoral Company Limited;
John Ross Smith;
Venlock Pty Ltd; and
Westmoreland Pastoral Company Pty Ltd.
7 The Gangalidda and Garawa Peoples are, according to the anthropological evidence, constituent parts of a single cultural bloc. Professor Trigger of the University of Queensland has spent much of his professional life in contact with that cultural bloc. He considers that it includes, apart from the Gangalidda and Garawa Peoples, the Waanyi and a number of other named language groups to the north and west. Professor Trigger says in his report dated 20 March 2012 at para 4, that:
…
The shared laws and customs across this regional society, that extends as far east as the vicinity of the Leichhardt River, include the following:
• The same subsection or 'skin' system of 8 categories (with the same set of 16 terms for male and female persons);
• The same system of spiritual (or totemic) entities inhering in the landscape;
• Adaptations and transformations of the structurally similar system of estate groups;
• The same form of kinship system (with both shared and some different actual terms of address and reference);
• A history of intermarriage and resulting multiple personal potential memberships in both Waanyi and Ganggalida groups, such that a significant number of individuals have a primary link to country of one group together with a secondary link to the country of the other group;
• Both Waanyi and Ganggalida groups have social, kinship and historical connections and relationships with the adjacent Garawa group to the west;
…
8 The Gangalidda and Garawa Peoples do not claim equal interests in the whole of each claim area. Professor Trigger has identified the eastern boundary of Garawa traditional land and waters as running more or less north-south, about 30 kms east of the Queensland/Northern Territory border. I should add that Garawa traditional land extends into the Northern Territory. Generally, Gangalidda land lies to the east of that line. Professor Trigger considers that there is a transitional zone extending up to 10 kms to the west of the line. Both Gangalidda and Garawa Peoples assert traditional rights over that area. Professor Trigger also describes Garawa country at para 7 of his report dated June 2010 as follows:
The Garawa system of estates, Dreamings and associated 'skins' extends eastwards into Queensland to Massacre Inlet on the coast. Inland from the coast, Garawa country extends southwards along Settlement Creek, then southwards to the vicinity of the junction of Lagoon Creek and Hann Creek (known as Percy Creek further upstream). The line indicating the eastward extent of Garawa country then extends southwards to cross Eight Mile Creek and continue to the vicinity of a site known as Balaganyi ( … an area surrounding a hill located around 35 km east of the N.T./Qld border). This location marks a topographic boundary of sorts with the beginning of hilly areas extending to the west. …
9 Concerning the Gangalidda People, Professor Trigger says in his report dated December 1998 at pp 5, 6 and 9:
Those who identify as members of the category of persons known as "Ganggalida people" are the descendants of the people who at the time of European arrival were in occupation of coastal areas of land and sea from the vicinity of Massacre Inlet in the west to at least the vicinity of Moonlight Creek in the east. It is difficult to reconstruct precisely the location of the eastern boundary of Ganggalida country with the territory of another language group known as Minggin or Mingginda … . However, Ganggalida people are the successors of the Mingginda People who were in occupation of the area from the Leichhardt River west to what was, during times beyond the living memory of all but a few contemporary older persons, the boundary with Ganggalida country.
The population of Ganggalida people is made up of interconnected extended families.
These are cognatic groups in that membership of them is traced through either parent, and then through either male or female lineal links, to earlier generations of one's ancestry. The groups tend to have a patrifilial core in that successive earlier generations are often traced through a male line. However, it would seem there has been a shift to a broadly accepted cognatic principle in these groups, over the past few generations, such that it is now just as common for people to be members by matrifiliation as by patrifiliation … .
The primary rule for membership among Ganggalida people is that a person is socially acknowledged as belonging to one or more of what are referred to as Ganggalida "families".
There are cases where adoption by a Ganggalida family is accepted as conferring on the adopted person the right to identify with Ganggalida people and assert interests in the group's cultural property.
As these extracts demonstrate, the Gangalidda People claim some areas as successors to earlier owners in accordance with traditional laws and customs. This question has been dealt with in part, but at some length, in earlier proceedings.
10 Of the Garawa People, Mr Jeff Stead says in his report dated June 2010 at para 1.37:
A number of literature sources attempt to localise Garawa language territory. Tindale has Karawa (Garawa) extending east to Wollogorang Station and on to Westmoreland but excludes the coastal plain. Roth's data (collected at the turn of the 20th Century) also locates traditional Karawa (Garawa) territory on or close to the claim area, locating it on the upper Settlement Creek, with a main residential focus being in the Northern Territory at Wollogorang Station. Matthews locates Karrawar (Garawa) in the general area between the Calvert and Nicholson Rivers which would include much of the claim area. Oates' analysis locates Garawa territory as running north from the Nicholson River, west to the MacArthur River and east to eighty kilometres inside Queensland. Furby and Furby also locate the claim area within Garawa territory having it extending east into Queensland by approximately fifty miles … . Kumarage's research confirms Garawa interests within the claim area, identifying Garawa estates in the north-western corner. In the author's opinion, this body of research clearly indicates that historically, and currently, the claim area was, and is, identified with the Garawa People and their law and custom. The author's investigations over the last thirty years also confirm that the claim area is associated with the Garawa People and Garawa law and custom.
(References omitted.)
Professor Trigger in his report dated June 2010 concerning the Garawa People says at para 8:
The system of estates and related 'skin' groups (subsections and semi-moieties) upon which Garawa law and custom in regard to land is based continues into Queensland. There are processes of internal succession enabling people to circulate through relationships of various kinds to the different estates … . On this basis there is a continuing Garawa system for resolving those particular families who hold locality-specific rights and interests to the country in Queensland, as well as the broader Garawa group who hold generic rights and interests largely throughout Garawa country. I have discussed this distinction between locality-specific and generic rights in my reports in the Ganggalida sea claim and the Waanyi native title claim. …
11 Concerning the Gangalidda People's first European contact following sovereignty, Spender J said in earlier proceedings in Gangalidda and Garawa People v State of Queensland [2010] FCA 646 at [22] - [25]:
22 I cite the following historical observations taken from paragraph 6 of the Applicant's submissions filed in these proceedings, that give an understanding of the society that existed at first contact and the changes to that society as a consequence of European contact:
As early as November 1802, just [fourteen] years after the establishment of the colony of New South Wales, Matthew Flinders observed that the islands which he named the Wellesley Islands were inhabited by Indigenous people. In November 1802 Flinders stayed over a month in the vicinity of the Wellesley Islands, to undertake repairs to his vessel, the HMS Investigator, and to replenish supplies of water and wood. He observed "natives" on Bentinck Island, Sweers Island, Allen Island, Horseshoe Island and Mornington Island. He observed spiral shells used as water containers, and midden material comprising shells and turtle bones on Horseshoe Island. He observed sleeping hollows on Bentinck and Sweers Island, and wells, midden material and human remains on Sweers Island.
Later explorers confirmed the presence of Indigenous people on the islands and adjoining coastal mainland. In July 1841 John Lort Stokes in the HMS Beagle anchored in Investigator Road. Stokes reported "natives" on Sweers Island and on Allen Island. He travelled 40 miles upstream of the Albert River and continued on foot. He was so impressed with the soil and vegetation of the area that he called it 'the plains of promise'. He observed 'native skulls' and long bones on Sweers Island, and a well at Bayley Point.
In 1844-1845 Ludwig Leichhardt's expedition travelled along the southern part of the Gulf. They crossed the Albert River, travelled along the Nicholson River, and travelled to Port Essington. They found camps, tracks, and fish traps of Aboriginal people.
In 1865 pastoralist JG Macdonald established a settlement on the Albert River twelve miles inland from the Gulf. It was named Burketown. Severe fever inflicted the residents, and the fever victims were evacuated to Sweers Island. The majority of the population of Burketown was relocated in 1866 to Sweers Island in 1866 where a township called Carnarvon was established.
In 1880 Captain Pennefather in the HMS Pearl landed on Sweers Island and Allen Island and examined the fish traps, and in 1881 surveyed the waters between Point Parker and Allen Island. In 1880 he recorded that he 'saw a large mob of natives, who did not allow us to approach them.'
On 6 January 1866 the pastoral district of Burke was proclaimed. A number of pastoral operations commenced: Lawn Hill in 1875, Gregory Downs in 1876, Lorraine in 1878, Punjaub in 1880, Augustus Downs in 1880, Westmoreland circa 1880s. In 1888 a school was opened in Burketown, and boiling down works were established in 1892. Aboriginal people from the region were attracted to the town. Camps were established on the fringes of the town. By the late 1890s the population of the camps had grown to more than 200.
In 1899 Inspector Lamond closed down the camps. He provided 'rations for each tribe and sent them off to their old hunting grounds'. In November 1899 J. Ordish, officer in charge at Turn Off Lagoon, reported that 130 of the 'Point Parker tribe' were camping at Moonlight Creek - 'they are improving now they are away from Burketown ... now they are settling down to their native food.' The coastal country between the Northern Territory border and Point Parker was considered unsuitable for cattle. In 1896 Police Inspector Urquhart reported that this country was 'wholly unoccupied except by the blacks'. Within several years fringe camps were re-established at Burketown and Normanton. By 1906 Burketown camp had 220 residents. Occasionally, rations and blankets were issued by the local Protector.
23 At paragraph 13 in my reasons in the Lardil, Yangkaal, Gangalidda and Kaiadilt People Land Claim, I referred to submissions specifically in respect to Gangalidda people where it was said that:
It should also be noted that during the first half of the 19th century Gangalidda people, though coming to live in camps on pastoral stations and at Burketown (as well as at the Dumaji Mission established in 1933), continued to move around the coastal country, at least into the 1920s and 1930s. Such occupation of the Gangalidda coastal lands entailed considerable movement among people and this included some travel via traditional watercraft between the mainland and the North Wellesley Islands. Waters relatively near to the beach were routinely used for obtaining foods and other resources.
24 This historical overview records that from the time of first European contact, the Determination Area was inhabited by Aboriginal people, and by inference from the date of sovereignty, and thereafter.
25 The Gangalidda people have maintained their connection to the claimed land and waters through their continuing enjoyment and use of them. That connection supports the rights and interests claimed in this application.
(Emphasis in original.)
Equally, I would add, that connection supports the rights and interests claimed in the applications today.
12 Concerning the Garawa People's first European contact after sovereignty, I cite the following passage from Mr Stead's report dated June 2010 at paras 1.18 - 1.31:
1.18 The following paragraphs analyses significant events of the claim region (including the claim area), with the aim of illustrating the degree of Aboriginal occupation of the claim region (and area) at contact and onwards. The analysis also attempts to obtain an understanding of traditional Aboriginal life in the claim region at first contact.
…
1.19 Marine explorers sailed within close proximity of the coastal portion of the claim region (and area). Flinders charted the southern coast of the Gulf of Carpentaria in 1802. He records Aboriginal occupation of the coastline from the Pellew Islands to the Wesley Islands [sic]. His party had very brief encounters with Aboriginal people. Flinders describes hunting and gathering techniques, Aboriginal dwellings and the use of rafts. In later years Stokes (early 1840's), Chimmo (in 1850's) and Pennefather (in 1880) all record the presence of Aboriginal people in the southern Gulf of Carpentaria.
1.20 Leichhardt in his expedition from Moreton Bay to Port Essington, encountered many Aboriginal people from the Albert River (in Queensland), west to the Robertson River in the (now) Northern Territory. He describes their artefacts, dwellings, food sources, methods of preparing and storing food, use of red ochre and the presence of fish and emu traps.
…
1.21 Wells who along with Carruthers (1880's) surveyed the Queensland/Northern Territory border recorded the names of the three Aboriginal individuals 'Jakkamarri, 'Kumerange' and 'Bellarimi' which generally equate to sub-sections term currently in use in the general region. In the author's opinion, they are important elements of Aboriginal laws and customs as they related to the regulation of marriage and the establishment of socio-centric relationships between groups … .
1.22 Dymock provides information about Aboriginal occupation of Westmoreland and Wollogorang Stations in the 1880's through his data on Aboriginal/European conflict e.g. at Damorli Lagoon (Westmoreland Homestead), Hell's Gate, Massacre Inlet at the mouth of Lagoon Creek, Battle Creek approximately ten kilometres up Lagoon Creek from Westmoreland Homestead, and a number of upper tributaries of Branch Creek.
1.23 Dymock relying on Garawa oral history, relates the gatherings of Aboriginal people at Baladuna Waterhole on Settlement Creek, about eighteen kilometres up from Wollogorang Station (in 1897). His data indicates that one of the attendees was Illibarra (Healy Burra), also known as "King Hillyborough of Wollogorang", who had traditional interests in the Settlement Creek area. … Dymock also records ceremonial activities involving Garawa people in north-west Queensland including at Westmoreland and Turn-off Lagoons.
1.24 Blake's analysis also demonstrates Aboriginal occupation of the claim region (and claim area) in 1899. Relying on police correspondence, he indicates that: one hundred and thirty Carawa (Garawa) were camped at the head of the Nicholson River; one hundred people camped on Moonlight Creek; and fifty Aboriginal people (Euchlo) camping between Point Parker and the SA (Northern Territory) border. I agree with Blake's opinion this demonstrates that despite contact with Europeans for many years, distinct groups and their territory were readily identifiable. Blake's analysis of the historical data indicates that the coastal country between Borroloola and Point Parker (this includes the coastal portions of the claim area) was occupied by Aboriginal people.
1.25 Given this historical data the author is of the opinion that the claim region (and area) was occupied by Aboriginal people at first contact.
1.26 There is early ethnographic data which links the Garawa People to the claim region (and area) and demonstrates aspects of their laws and customs, which are still currently relevant.
1.27 Stretton who was a magistrate and collector of customs at Borroloola during the 1890's, identifies a Leearrwa (Garawa) tribe of one hundred people centred on the Robinson River. He also provides generalised data on the laws and customs of a number of Aboriginal groups of the western Gulf of Carpentaria including the Garawa. Such laws and customs include, use of native flora as medicine, marriage laws, avoidance of certain relations, body scarification, performance of initiation rites, the practice of adoption, and burial rites. Stretton's data also partially addresses the connection of individuals and groups to their land. His data suggests that each individual has a relationship with his birth place. It also demonstrates territoriality between groups and traditionally, sanctions for trespass that were enforced against Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal.
1.28 The pioneering anthropologists Gillen and Spencer contacted Aboriginal people of the Gulf of Carpentaria in their expedition through northern Australia. These contacts were recorded in Gillen's daily diary and subsequent publications. Most of this data was collected at Borroloola in 1901. They locate Garawa territory close to the coast on the east of the Robinson River. Whilst they recorded little direct Garawa data, they did collect information from neighbouring groups with similar laws and customs … including, knowledge of myth, use of sub-sections and semi-moieties, marriage arrangements and ritual.
1.29 Roth collected data in the early 1900's. He locates the Karawa (Garawa) tribe at the head of Settlement Creek (which runs through the western claim area) with their chief camp at Wollogorang Station. Constable Alford, based at the Turn-off Lagoon Police Post (during the 1890's) identifies the Carawagh (Garawa) as frequenting the Queensland/Northern Territory border up to the Calvert River.
1.30 The evidence examined above, in the author's view, clearly indicates that Aboriginal people were living within the claim region from at least the early Nineteenth Century. The historical and early ethnographic data also indicates there were Garawa people living within the claim region (and claim area) since the latter years of the Nineteenth and early years of the next Century. In the author's opinion, it is similarly clear, that these people maintained a social system with regulating laws and customs such as, marriage rules, kinship avoidance, initiation rites, the practice of adoption, sanctions for trespass, and a system of social classification including the use of sub-section terms. The evidence, in the author's opinion, also indicates that the Garawa (and neighbouring groups) were semi-nomadic people who had specialist techniques and artefacts to exploit the environment in which they lived (e.g. traps, canoes and flora processing techniques).
1.31 It is the author's opinion that is it appropriate to infer that this way of life, and its accompanying system of rules and customs, were in existence prior to the 1890's. Similarly it is the author's opinion, that had there been an earlier, different system, dating prior to first contact then it would have been reported in early historical and ethnographic data. Thus, a conclusion that the way of life and system of law and customs recorded in last half of the Nineteenth Century was present at sovereignty is reasonable.
(References omitted.)
13 Although we know the names of so many of the European explorers, settlers, anthropologists and officials from those early times, we know little about the indigenous people whom they encountered. That is regrettable, but perhaps inevitable. In any event, today we recall all indigenous people who have, for thousands of years, owned and occupied this part of our country. These histories leave little room for doubt that the Gangalidda and Garawa Peoples occupied the claim areas as at the time of first European contact and, by inference, as at the date of the first claim to sovereignty, and that they are the traditional owners of the claim area.
14 Concerning ongoing connection, a large number of Gangalidda People and Garawa People have provided affidavits in which they describe personal associations with the claim area and associations between the claim group and the claim area. Time constraints prevent me from giving even a general summary of that evidence, or even listing the names of the people who have sworn the affidavits. It is sufficient to say that that evidence identifies numerous well-known locations within the claim area to which the Gangalidda and Garawa Peoples relate and describes the nature of the ongoing connection between them and such areas. The evidence also provides detailed descriptions of traditional laws and customs as they relate to the Gangalidda and Garawa Peoples and the claim area.
15 I am grateful for the submissions prepared by counsel for the Applicants, Mr Athanasiou. They have helped greatly in the preparation of these reasons.
16 Section 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (the "Native Title Act") authorizes the Court, in certain circumstances, to decide that native title exists without conducting a full hearing. Broadly speaking, the Court may proceed in that way where all of the parties agree, and the Court considers that it is appropriate so to do. On 19 December 2014 and 30 January 2015, agreements were filed in QUD 84 of 2004 and QUD 66 of 2005 respectively. Those agreements were the result of years of work and persistence on the part of the claim group and the other parties. QUD 66 of 2005 posed particular problems. Those problems have been resolved by way of mediation, in good faith, and with good will. The Court's Native Title Registrar, Mr Ian Irving and the Queensland Native Title Registrar, Mrs Christine Fewings, have made particular contributions to that process. I should also mention the involvement in the mediation process of the Honourable SG Jones AO, formerly the Far Northern Judge of the Supreme Court of Queensland. Mr Jones has assisted in the resolution of many problems. Those involved in native title in Queensland are fortunate that he makes his skills available to us. I am pleased that he is with us today.
17 The proposed determination in QUD 84 of 2004 recognizes the existence of exclusive native title over the land and waters described in Schedule 2 to each of the orders and non-exclusive nature title rights and interests over that part of the claim area which is identified in Schedule 3. The Gangalidda People hold native title over that part of the claim area described in Schedule 4. The Garawa People hold native title over that part of the claim area described in Schedule 5. The Gangalidda People are described in Schedule 6, and the Garawa People, in Schedule 7.
18 Orders 11, 12 and 13 provide:
11. Subject to orders 14, 15 and 18, the nature and extent of the native title rights and interests in relation to that part of the Determination Area described in Schedule 2 and shown in Schedule 10, other than in relation to the use and enjoyment of Water (which is dealt with in order 13), is the right to possession, occupation, use and enjoyment of the Determination Area to the exclusion of all others.
12. Subject to orders 14, 15, 16 and 18, the nature and extent of the native title rights and interests in relation to that part of the Determination Area described in Schedule 3 and shown in Schedule 10, other than in relation to the use and enjoyment of Water (which is dealt with in order 13) are non-exclusive rights:
(a) to access, to be present on and to traverse the area;
(b) to hunt, fish and gather Natural Resources on the area for personal, domestic, and non-commercial communal purposes;
(c) to take, use, share and exchange Natural Resources from the area for personal, domestic, and non-commercial communal purposes;
(d) to camp on the area but not to reside permanently or to erect permanent structures or fixtures;
(e) to light fires on the area for domestic purposes including cooking but not for the purposes of hunting or clearing vegetation;
(f) to conduct religious and spiritual activities and ceremonies on the area;
(g) to be buried on, and bury Native Title Holders on the area; and
(h) to maintain places and areas of importance or significance to the Native Title Holders under their traditional laws and customs and protect those places and areas from physical harm.
13. Subject to orders 14, 15 and 18, the nature and extent of the native title rights and interests in relation to the use and enjoyment of Water within the Determination Area are non-exclusive rights:
(a) to hunt and fish in and on and gather Natural Resources from the Water;
(b) to take, use, share and exchange Natural Resources from the Water; and
(c) to take, use and enjoy the Water,
for personal, domestic and non-commercial communal purposes.
19 The proposed determination in QUD 66 of 2005 recognizes the existence of exclusive native title rights and interests over that part of the claim area as is described in Schedule 2, and non-exclusive native title rights and interests over that part of the claim area as is described in Schedule 3. The Gangalidda People hold native title rights and interest over the area identified in Schedule 4. The Garawa People hold native title rights and interests over the area described in Schedule 5. The Gangalidda People are again described in Schedule 6, and the Garawa People, in Schedule 7.
20 Orders 12, 13, 14 and 15 provide:
12. Subject to orders 16, 17 and 20, the nature and extent of the native title rights and interests in relation to that part of the Determination Area described in Schedule 2 and shown in Schedule 11, other than in relation to the use and enjoyment of Water (which is dealt with in order 14), is the right to possession, occupation, use and enjoyment of the Determination Area to the exclusion of all others.
13. Subject to orders 16, 17, 18 and 20, the nature and extent of the native title rights and interests in relation to that part of the Determination Area described in Schedule 3 and shown in Schedule 11, other than in relation to the use and enjoyment of Water (which is dealt with in order 14) and land and waters on the seaward side of the High Water Mark (which is dealt with in order 15), are non-exclusive rights:
(a) to access, to be present on and to traverse the area;
(b) to hunt, fish and gather Natural Resources on the area for personal, domestic, and non-commercial communal purposes;
(c) to take, use, share and exchange Natural Resources from the area for personal, domestic, and non-commercial communal purposes;
(d) to camp on the area but not to reside permanently or to erect permanent structures or fixtures;
(e) to light fires on the area for domestic purposes including cooking but not for the purposes of hunting or clearing vegetation;
(f) to conduct religious and spiritual activities and ceremonies on the area;
(g) to be buried on, and bury Native Title Holders on the area; and
(h) to maintain places and areas of importance or significance to the Native Title Holders under their traditional laws and customs and protect those places and areas from physical harm.
14. Subject to orders 16, 17, 18 and 20, the nature and extent of the native title rights and interests in relation to the use and enjoyment of Water within the Determination Area, other than in relation to waters on the seaward side of the High Water Mark (which is dealt with in order 15), are non-exclusive rights:
(a) to hunt and fish in and on and gather Natural Resources from the Water;
(b) to take, use, share and exchange Natural Resources from the Water; and
(c) to take, use and enjoy the Water,
for personal, domestic, and non-commercial communal purposes.
15. Subject to orders 16, 17, 18 and 20, the nature and extent of the native title rights and interests in relation to the use and enjoyment of land and waters on the seaward side of the High Water Mark within that part of the Determination Area described in Schedule 3 and shown in Schedule 11 are non-exclusive rights:
(a) to access, to be present on and to traverse the area;
(b) to fish, hunt and gather Natural Resources on the area for personal, domestic or non-commercial communal purposes;
(c) to take, use, share and exchange Natural Resources from the area for personal, domestic, and non-commercial communal purposes;
(d) to take and consume fresh drinking water from fresh water springs in the inter tidal zone for domestic or non-commercial purposes;
(e) to conduct religious and spiritual activities or ceremonies on the area; and
(f) to visit places or areas of importance or significance to the Native Title Holders under their traditional laws and customs and protect those places and areas from physical harm.
21 The native title is not to be held in trust. Gangalidda and Garawa Native Title Aboriginal Corporation (RNTBC ICN 7365) is to be the prescribed body corporate for the purposes of ss 57(2) and 57(3) of the Native Title Act. It is to act as agent for the common law holders of the native title rights and interests and to perform the functions set out in the Native Title (Prescribed Bodies Corporate) Regulations 1999 (Cth).
22 Section 94A of the Native Title Act requires that an order for a determination of native title must set out details of the matters mentioned in s 225 of the Native Title Act. That section must be read together with s 223 of the Native Title Act. I am satisfied that the proposed orders address each of the relevant matters. Finally, I am satisfied that the orders are appropriate and in accordance with s 87 of the Native Title Act. I therefore make orders in terms of the draft provided in each case, which drafts I initial and place with the papers.
23 The Gangalidda and Garawa Peoples have waited a very long time to achieve recognition of their traditional rights and interests. They have, since first European contact, suffered much. That they have survived as recognizable societies with ongoing connection to their traditional lands says much about their individual and collective strength and resilience.
24 Native title rights and interests are the product of traditional laws and customs which have been observed and practised over the generations. Those rights and interests are now recognized and protected under the Native Title Act.
25 I have not come here today to give anything to the Gangalidda and Garawa Peoples. Rather, I have come to recognize, on behalf of all Australians, that they are the traditional owners of this land pursuant to traditional laws and customs which have their roots in ancient times. I now recognize that traditional ownership. In so doing, I bind all people for all time, including the Commonwealth of Australia, the State of Queensland, the Doomadgee Aboriginal Shire Council and the Burke Shire Council. On behalf of all other Australians, and in particular on behalf of the Judges of this Court and our staff, I congratulate you, the Gangalidda and Garawa Peoples upon the recognition which you have achieved today. We wish you well for the future in which we will all share.
I certify that the preceding twenty-five (25) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Dowsett.