Tax Practitioners Board v Lamede Group Proprietary Limited
[2016] FCA 656
At a glance
Source factsCourt
Federal Court of Australia
Decision date
2016-06-02
Before
Dowsett J
Catchwords
- Number of paragraphs: 7
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Catchwords
Judgment (4 paragraphs)
- the first respondent, between about January 2011 and about August 2013, by knowingly providing to each person, in relation to each income tax return (ITR), amendment of an ITR (amendment) and objection to an assessment of an ITR (objection) by the Commissioner of Taxation (Commissioner) itemised in Schedule B hereto in respect of that person, a service: 1.1 which involved the first respondent: 1.1.1 requesting from the person or his or her authorised representative information which was relevant or potentially relevant to the preparation of the person's ITR, amendment and/or objection; 1.1.2 giving advice to the person or his or her authorised representative concerning his or her liabilities, obligations or entitlements which arise, or could arise, under a taxation law; and/or 1.1.3 completing for the person and lodging any forms or correspondence relevant to the matters in sub-paragraph 1.1.1. with the Commissioner; and 1.2 for which service the first respondent charged a fee; 1.3 which services the person could reasonably be expected to rely on to satisfy liabilities or obligations, or claim entitlements, which arise, or could arise, under a taxation law; 1.4 when the first respondent: 1.4.1 was not a registered tax agent pursuant to the Tax Agent Services Act 2009 (Cth) (TASA); 1.4.2 was not providing the service in relation to a business activity statement; and 1.4.3 was not providing the service as part of a legal service; has, in respect of each said itemised service, provided a tax agent service in contravention of sub-section 50-5(1) of the TASA;
- the second respondent, between about July 2010 and about December 2010, by knowingly providing to each person, in relation to each ITR, amendment and objection to an assessment by the Commissioner itemised in Schedule A hereto in respect of that person, a service: 2.1 which involved the second respondent: 2.1.1 requesting from the person or his or her authorised representative information which was relevant or potentially relevant to the preparation of the person's ITR, amendment and/or objection; 2.1.2 giving advice to the person or his or her authorised representative about his or her liabilities, obligations or entitlements which arise, or could arise, under a taxation law; and/or 2.1.3 completing for the person and lodging any forms or correspondence relevant to the matters in sub-paragraph 2.1.1 with the Commissioner; and 2.2 for which the second respondent charged a fee; 2.3 which the person could reasonably be expected to rely on to satisfy liabilities or obligations, or claim entitlements, which arise, or could arise, under a taxation law; 2.4 when the second respondent: 2.4.1 was not a registered tax agent pursuant to the TASA: 2.4.2 was not providing the service in relation to a business activity statement; and 2.4.3 was not providing the service as part of a legal service; has, in respect of each said itemised service, provided a tax agent service in contravention of sub-section 50-5(1) of the TASA; and