© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.
[2005] FCA 1304
Federal Court of Australia
2005-09-19
Sackville J
Original judgment source is linked above.
SZFXY v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1304 SZFXY v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS NSD816 OF 2005 SACKVILLE J 19 SEPTEMBER 2005 SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 This an application for leave to appeal by the wife of the applicant in proceedings number NSD815 of 2005. The documentation in support of the application for leave to appeal is virtually identical to that filed in the other proceedings. 2 The applicant arrived in Australia on an Indian passport with a temporary business visa. Like her husband, she claimed to be a citizen of Bangladesh and to have fled that country for fear of persecution on religious grounds. The RRT found that she, too, was a citizen of India and that she was not a Bangladeshi national. The RRT rejected her claims. 3 The procedural history of this matter is substantially the same as that recounted in NSD815 of 2005. The Magistrate rejected the applicant's claim for relief in the same judgment in which he dismissed her husband's claims. His Honour did so for the same reasons. 4 For the reasons I have given in NSD815 of 2005, the applicant has not shown that the judgment of the Magistrate is attended by sufficient doubt to warrant the grant of leave to appeal. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal must be dismissed with costs. I certify that the preceding four (4) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Sackville.
Associate: Dated: 19 September 2005 The applicant appeared in person.
Solicitors for the respondent: Blake Dawson Waldron
SZFXY
Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs