Zoe

United States legal-change intelligence across legislation, regulation, and case law. Separate data plane, same Zoe spine.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Ask Zoe
Recently analysed

Company

Pricing
API
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Federal
Supreme Court

Zoe

United States legal-change intelligence across legislation, regulation, and case law. Separate data plane, same Zoe spine.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Ask Zoe
Recently analysed

Company

Pricing
API
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Federal
Supreme Court

Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the official source for authoritative text.

Sysel v Dinon & Ors [2002] QCA 149 - QCA 2002 case summary — Zoe

Zoe

Legislation Cases Absurdities Ask Zoe Graph Pricing

Ask Zoe →

Home/Cases/[2002] QCA 149

QLDQCA

Sysel v Dinon & Ors [2002] QCA 149

[2002] QCA 149

Court of Appeal (Qld)|2002-04-26|Before: Muir J, Pherson JA, Williams JA

View original source

At a glance

Source facts

Court

Court of Appeal (Qld)

Decision date

2002-04-26

Before

Muir J, Pherson JA, Williams JA

Source

Original judgment source is linked above.

Judgment (8 paragraphs)

[1]

Sysel v Dinon & Ors [2002] QCA 149 (26 April 2002)

[2]

[2002] QCA 149

[3]

DJ EDMONDS and SERGEANT GT FLEMING Respondents/Respondents

[4]

THE PRESIDENT: This appeal was heard by a Court consisting of Judges of Appeal, McPherson and Williams and Muir J.

[5]

(1) the application for leave to appeal against sentence is dismissed;

[6]

(2) the application for leave to extend time to apply under section 188 of the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 is granted;

[7]

(3) the application under section 188 of the Penalties and Sentences 1992 to reopen proceedings is refused.

[8]

I publish the separate reasons for judgment of each member of the Court, each concurring as to the orders made.

Parties

Applicant/Plaintiff:

# Sysel

Respondent/Defendant:

Dinon & Ors \[2002\] QCA 149

Legislation Cited (1)

Sentences Act 1992