State Wage Case 2024 – Review of Minimum Rates Awards [2025] NSWIRComm 1004
[2025] NSWIRComm 1004
At a glance
Source factsCourt
Industrial Relations Commission (NSW)
Decision date
2025-02-03
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Judgment (5 paragraphs)
Statement
- On 3 June 2024 the Fair Work Commission delivered a "National decision" within the meaning of s 48 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW) (IR Act), namely, Annual Wage Review 2023-2024 Decision [2024] FWCFB 3500. Consequently, on 14 June 2024, the Commission, acting on its own initiative pursuant to s 50 of the IR Act, issued a Summons to Show Cause to interested parties (the terms of which were revised in a further Summons issued on 5 July 2024), summonsing them to appear before the Commission to show cause why the Commission should not take action pursuant to Part 3 of Chapter 2 of the IR Act and cl 4 of the Wage Fixing Principles as determined by the State Wage Case 2022 [2022] NSWIRComm 1081, as it considers appropriate and why it should not review the Wage Fixing Principles published in that case.
- In State Wage Case 2024 [2024] NSWIRComm 1, the Full Bench comprising the Presidential Members of the Commission identified the Commission's intention to deal with the matter in two distinct stages: the first stage concerning the adoption of the National decision for the purposes of ss 50 and 52 of the IR Act in respect of three categories of specific awards; and the second being a broad review of the form and content of the Commission's Wage Fixing Principles.
- The Commission, comprising the Presidential Members together with Senior Commissioner Constant and myself, delivered its decision in respect of the first stage of the proceeding on 9 October 2024 in State Wage Case 2024 (No 2) [2024] NSWIRComm 6. In that decision the Commission determined to increase the rates of pay and pay-related allowances by 3.75% in line with the National decision, from 1 July 2024 in respect of "Category 1" awards and from 1 September 2024 in respect of "Category 2" and "Category 3" awards. However, for reasons I will now reiterate, the Commission also identified a need for all of the awards identified in the three categories to be reviewed to establish first, their ongoing utility and second, whether the rates provided for in the awards require adjustment to ensure they represent fair and reasonable wages in conformity with the Commission's statutory mandate.