Rural Bank of New South Wales v Hayes
[1951] HCA 58
At a glance
Source factsCourt
High Court of Australia
Decision date
1951-07-01
Before
Kitto JJ, Owen J
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Judgment (31 paragraphs)
High Court of Australia Dixon, McTiernan, Williams, Fullagar and Kitto JJ. Rural Bank of New South Wales v Hayes [1951] HCA 58
Oct. 16 Dixon, McTiernan, Williams and Kitto JJ.
In each of these cases, the appellant sued the respondent in an action of ejectment in the Supreme Court of New South Wales, claiming to be entitled to the possession of premises which were "prescribed premises" within the meaning of the Landlord and Tenant (Amendment) Act, 1948-1949 N.S.W.. The particulars of claim in each action alleged, in effect, that the defendant had held the premises as a tenant of the claimant, and that the tenancy had been duly determined by notice to quit. Each defendant entered an appearance and filed particulars of defence denying the due determination of the tenancy, and relying upon the fact that no notice to quit complying with s. 62 of the Landlord and Tenant (Amendment) Act had been served. One defendant (Hayes) also alleged specifically that, by reason of s. 69 of that Act, the Supreme Court had no jurisdiction to entertain the action.