278 It must be apparent from what we have said that given the peculiar combination of factors addressed above, we consider there may be a proper basis, on special case grounds, that the increases granted in the 2006 State Wage Case and the 2007 State Wage Case should be applied to the rates of pay under the Child Care Award. We intend to remit this matter to a Member of the Commission and, subject to the LHMU making application under the Special Case Principle, the member shall deal with the application in accordance with the observations made in this decision. The operative dates of the increases will be a matter for the member to determine but we would indicate that adjustment in rates by the incorporation of the amounts awarded in the 2006 and 2007 State Wage Cases may be comfortably accommodated in the application of the Special Case Principle. In the event no application is made within 28 days of this decision, the matter will lapse and the existing file will be closed. Such application may be made by seeking leave to amend the application brought in Matter No IRC 3608 of 2006.
2 The Full Bench addressed the matter in Order no 7 in the following terms:
(7) The application by the LHMU in Matter No IRC 3608 of 2006 is remitted to a Member of the Commission to be dealt with in accordance with this decision.
3 The matter was remitted to the Commission as presently constituted.
4 On 20 June 2007 the Liquor, Hospitality and Miscellaneous Union, New South Wales Branch (LHMU) filed and served an amended application seeking variation of the Miscellaneous Workers Kindergarten and Child Care Centres (State) Award 2006 ("the Award") (2006) 359 IG 843 to apply the 2006 State Wage Case (2006) 153 IR 268 from 7 December 2006 and the 2007 State Wage Case from the date of Decision in these proceedings.
5 On 26 June 2007 the application was subject to Directions proceedings. Leave to amend the application was granted and directions issued leading to hearing of the Special Case application by the LHMU on 30 July 2007.
6 On hearing the LHMU relied upon all of the material advanced during the course of the 2007 State Wage Case, in particular Exhibit 13 (LHMU's submissions), the oral evidence, and cross examination in transcript of the 2007 State Wage Case.
7 The respondent employers sought a further opportunity for conciliation and the proceedings adjourned for that purpose.
8 Resulting from discussion between the parties the employers proposed that:
s the 2006 State Wage Case be applied from the first pay period to commence on or after 30 July 2007;
s the 2007 State Wage Case be applied from the first pay period to commence on or after 1 September 2007 which coincides with an increase determined by the Full Bench of the Commission in the Work Value case [2006] NSWIRComm 64;
s subject to the conduct of a State Wage Case in 2008 maintaining the 12 month rule, it is the expectation of the parties that 1 September 2008 would be the appropriate date for implementation of the 2008 State Wage Case decision.
9 The LHMU accepted this proposition in settlement of the application.
10 I am satisfied that the agreement reached between the parties is consistent with the State Wage Case principles and the relevant provisions of the Industrial Relations Act 1996.
11 The Award is varied by consent of the parties in accordance with the attached Amended Schedule A.
12 I so determine.
oo0oo