© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.
[2001] QCA 309
Court of Appeal (Qld)
2001-08-07
McMurdo P, Thomas JA and Jones JJoint reasons for judgment of Thomas JA, and Jones J, separate reasons of McMurdo P, dissenting in part
Original judgment source is linked above.
CRIMINAL LAW - PARTICULAR OFFENCES - SEXUAL OFFENCES - where both accuseds and complainant affected by alcohol - where complainant had fallen asleep and woke as one accused was having sexual intercourse with her and the other was licking her breasts - where "blank spots" in complainant's memory - whether actions of one accused encouraged the other
CRIMINAL LAW - JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - JURIES - SUMMING-UP - whether judge erred in direction concerning application of s7(1)(c) Criminal Code and "joint enterprise" to commit offence
CRIMINAL LAW - JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - JURIES - MISCELLANEOUS POWERS OF COURTS AND JUDGES - whether judge erred in not discharging two jurors in circumstances where they were business associates of the complainant's mother and investigating officer's wife, respectively
CRIMINAL LAW - JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - JURIES - SUMMING UP - whether judge erred in direction concerning intoxication of complainant and resultant loss of memory - whether direction inadequate
CRIMINAL LAW - EVIDENCE - JUDICIAL DISCRETION TO ADMIT OR EXCLUDE EVIDENCE - EVIDENTIARY MATTERS RELATING TO WITNESSES AND ACCUSED PERSONS - whether judge erred in admission of evidence that appellant worked as a law clerk between being charged with offence and trial
CRIMINAL LAW - JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - JURIES - SUMMING UP - whether judge erred in direction on lies - whether direction deficient
CRIMINAL LAW - JURISDICTION PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - JURIES - VERDICT - whether unsafe and unsatisfactory
Criminal Code s 7, s 7(1)(a), s 7(1)(b), s 7(1)(c), s 8
Edwards v The Queen (1993) 1978 CLR 193, distinguished
R v Brennan [1999] 2 QdR 529, considered
R v Edwards & Ors [2000] QCA 508; CA No 148,159,168 of 2000, 14 December 2000, considered
R v Lowrie and Ross [2001] 1 QdR 529, distinguished
Tangye (1997) 92 A Crim R 545, considered
Webb & Hay v R [1994] HCA 30; (1994) 181 CLR 41, considered
Zoneff v R (2000) 200 CLR 234, considered
Director of Public Prosecutions (Queensland) for the respondent
R
Walton & Harman [2001] QCA 309
(1993) 1978 CLR 193
(1994) 181 CLR 41
(2000) 200 CLR 234