QLDQCA
R v Vinson [2002] QCA 379
[2002] QCA 379
Court of Appeal (Qld)|2002-09-27|Before: Williams and Jerrard JJA and Atkinson JSeparate, reasons for judgment of each member of the Court, each concurring as to the, order made
View original sourceAt a glance
Source factsCourt
Court of Appeal (Qld)
Decision date
2002-09-27
Before
Williams and Jerrard JJA and Atkinson JSeparate, reasons for judgment of each member of the Court, each concurring as to the, order made
Catchwords
- CRIMINAL LAW – JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – JUDGMENT
- AND PUNISHMENT – SENTENCE – FACTORS TO BE
- TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT –
- MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS – PLEA OF GUILTY, CONTRITION AND CO-OPERATION
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Catchwords
CRIMINAL LAW – JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – JUDGMENTAND PUNISHMENT – SENTENCE – FACTORS TO BETAKEN INTO ACCOUNT –MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS – PLEA OF GUILTY, CONTRITION AND CO-OPERATION– ASSISTANCE TO AUTHORITIESAND CO-OPERATION – where applicantcommitted 27 separate dishonesty offences – where applicant volunteered topolicethe commission of 22 of these offences – where applicant submitsthat the fraud would have continued undetected had he notdisclosed the offencesto police – where applicant did not disclose all of the offences whenoriginally questioned –where learned sentencing judge described theapplicant as exhibiting some remorse – whether learned sentencing judgeerredin not finding that the applicant’s co-operation evidenced thepresence of overwhelming remorseCRIMINAL LAW – JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – JUDGMENTAND PUNISHMENT – SENTENCE – FACTORS TO BE