QLDQCA
R v Tribe [2001] QCA 206
[2001] QCA 206
Court of Appeal (Qld)|2001-06-01|Before: McMurdo P, Williams JA and Mackenzie JSeparate reasons for judgment of, each member of the court, each concurring as to the orders made.
View original sourceAt a glance
Source factsCourt
Court of Appeal (Qld)
Decision date
2001-06-01
Before
McMurdo P, Williams JA and Mackenzie JSeparate reasons for judgment of, each member of the court, each concurring as to the orders made.
Catchwords
- CRIMINAL LAW - APPEAL & NEW TRIAL & INQUIRY AFTER CONVICTION
- – APPEAL & NEW TRIAL – PARTICULAR GROUNDS –
- UNREASONABLE
- OR INSUPPORTABLE VERDICT – IMPROPER ADMISSION OR REJECTION OF EVIDENCE
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Catchwords
CRIMINAL LAW - APPEAL & NEW TRIAL & INQUIRY AFTER CONVICTION– APPEAL & NEW TRIAL – PARTICULAR GROUNDS –UNREASONABLEOR INSUPPORTABLE VERDICT – IMPROPER ADMISSION OR REJECTION OF EVIDENCE– GENERAL PRINCIPLES – whereappeal against conviction of rape– whether the verdict of the jury was unreasonable and unable to besupported by the evidence– whether the complainant’s evidence wasinconsistent and inherently unreliable – whether the learned trial judgeerred in not exercising his discretion to allow cross-examination of thecomplainant concerning prior allegations of rape as conferredby s 4Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act 1978.Criminal Law (SexualOffences) Act (Qld) 1978, s4 Bull v The Queen (2000) 171 ALR613, consideredHouse v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499, considered
Judgment (1 paragraphs)
[1]