QLDQCA
R v T; ex parte Attorney-General of Queensland [2002] QCA 132
[2002] QCA 132
Court of Appeal (Qld)|2002-04-12|Before: McPherson JA, Byrne and Philippides JJSeparate reasons for judgment of, each member of the Court, each concurring as to the orders made.
View original sourceAt a glance
Source factsCourt
Court of Appeal (Qld)
Decision date
2002-04-12
Before
McPherson JA, Byrne and Philippides JJSeparate reasons for judgment of, each member of the Court, each concurring as to the orders made.
Catchwords
- CRIMINAL LAW – APPEAL AGAINST SENTENCE – APPEAL BY
- ATTORNEY-GENERAL OR OTHER CROWN LAW OFFICER – APPLICATION TO
- INCREASE
- SENTENCE – OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON – where respondent convicted
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Catchwords
CRIMINAL LAW – APPEAL AGAINST SENTENCE – APPEAL BYATTORNEY-GENERAL OR OTHER CROWN LAW OFFICER – APPLICATION TOINCREASESENTENCE – OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON – where respondent convictedof indecent dealing and unlawful carnalknowledge – where sentence imposedof 2 years imprisonment – where recommendation for parole after 8 months– whethersentence manifestly inadequate – effect of increase inmaximum penalty. Criminal Code (Qld), s 215R v C[2002] QCA 46CA No 369 of 2001, 22 February 2001, consideredR vDouglas CA No 416 of 1996, 12 November 1996, consideredR v Melano, exparte Attorney-General [1994] QCA 523[1995] 2 Qd R 186, consideredR v Morgan, exparte Attorney-General CA No 517 of 1996, 4 October 1996, consideredRv Rae CA No 111 of 1999, 4 June 1999, consideredR v Regan CA No381 of 1997, 21 November 1997, consideredR v Snow, ex parte Attorney-General CA No 389 of 1996, 7 October1996, considered