QLDQCA
R v Stone [2006] QCA 103
[2006] QCA 103
Court of Appeal (Qld)|2006-04-07|Before: McMurdo P, Jerrard JA and Chesterman JSeparate, reasons for judgment of each member of the Court, each concurring as to the, order made
View original sourceAt a glance
Source factsCourt
Court of Appeal (Qld)
Decision date
2006-04-07
Before
McMurdo P, Jerrard JA and Chesterman JSeparate, reasons for judgment of each member of the Court, each concurring as to the, order made
Catchwords
- CRIMINAL LAW – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL AND INQUIRY AFTER CONVICTION
- – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL - APPEAL AGAINST SENTENCE –
- APPEAL BY
- CONVICTED PERSONS – APPLICATIONS TO REDUCE SENTENCE – WHEN REFUSED
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Catchwords
CRIMINAL LAW – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL AND INQUIRY AFTER CONVICTION– APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL - APPEAL AGAINST SENTENCE –APPEAL BYCONVICTED PERSONS – APPLICATIONS TO REDUCE SENTENCE – WHEN REFUSED– GENERALLY - where applicant convictedof producing more than 500 gramsof cannabis sativa, possessing this drug and possessing items used in connectionwith producingthis drug - where applicant sentenced on first count to 12months' imprisonment to be suspended after serving six months with anoperational period of three years and on second count to two years' probation– where applicant has a significant criminalhistory involving productionand possession of marijuana – where applicant claims to obtain relief fromarthritic pain by themedicinal use of cannabis – where applicant claimsthat his age, chronic pain, good record of employment and community service,plea of guilty and co-operation with police are factors in his favour in thisapplication – whether applicant should have received