R v Steindl [2001] QCA 315
[2001] QCA 315
At a glance
Source factsCourt
Court of Appeal (Qld)
Decision date
2001-08-03
Before
Murdo P, Davies JA, Thomas JA
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Judgment (4 paragraphs)
THE PRESIDENT: The Court intends to reserve the appeal against conviction and requires a transcript. As to the application for leave to appeal against the sentence, I am satisfied the sentence was manifestly excessive. The applicant has spent 142 days in custody and no greater penalty should have been imposed, than in respect of count 1, a fully suspended sentence of six months and in respect of count 2, a sentence of 18 months suspended forthwith.
At this stage, I would grant the application and allow the appeal and instead of the sentence imposed below in respect of count 1, stealing, I would order the applicant be sentenced to six months' imprisonment, fully suspended, with an operational period of two years and in respect of count 2, a sentence of 18 months' imprisonment, suspended forthwith, with an operational period of two years.