R v Skedgwell [1998] QCA 93
[1998] QCA 93
At a glance
Source factsCourt
Court of Appeal (Qld)
Decision date
1998-05-15
Before
Before McPherson J, Davies J, Shepherdson J, Mr J
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Judgment (1 paragraphs)
The application and appeal will be allowed to the extent of varying the sentence of imprisonment for 5 years imposed in respect of count 1 in the indictment by adding a recommendation that the applicant be considered for parole after he has served two years of that sentence. The declaration here in relation to the sentence on count 2 was made in deference to the mandatory provisions of s.161(3) of the Act. As we see the matter, it cannot have any practical effect on the sentence that will be served in this case, and there is therefore no reason why it should be disturbed. The period of 245 days of pre-sentence custody has, however, as these reasons show, been allowed for in the recommendation for parole which has now been added to the sentence below.
Parties
# R
Skedgwell \[1998\] QCA 93