NSWNSWDC
R v Makouk
[2022] NSWDC 170
District Court of NSW|2022-05-05
View original sourceAt a glance
Source factsCourt
District Court of NSW
Decision date
2022-05-05
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Judgment (16 paragraphs)
[1]
Judgment
- Kaylan Makouk appears for sentence after having pleaded guilty in the Local Court to the following offences: 1. Robbery armed with a dangerous weapon contrary to s 97(2) Crimes Act 1900, taking into account a further count of the same offence on a Form 1; 2. Robbery armed with an offensive weapon contrary to s 97(1) Crimes Act 1900, taking into account one count of resist police officer in the execution of duty contrary to s 58 Crimes Act 1900 on a Form 1; and 3. Robbery armed with a dangerous weapon contrary to s 97(2) Crimes Act 1900, taking into account a further count of the same offence on a Form 1.
- The section 97(2) charges carry a maximum penalty of 25 years imprisonment and the s 97(1) charge carries a maximum penalty of 20 years imprisonment.
- I am also asked to sentence the offender for the following related offences appearing on a s 166 certificate: 1. Possess unauthorised pistol contrary to s 7(1) Firearms Act 1996, taking into account a further count of the same offence on a Form 1. This offence carries a maximum penalty of 14 years imprisonment and parliament has specified a standard non-parole period of 4 years. 2. Possess unregistered firearm pistol contrary to s 36(1) Firearms Act 1996, taking into account a further count of the same offence on a Form 1. This offence carries a maximum penalty of 14 years imprisonment.
[2]