Court of Appeal (Qld)|2001-10-26|Before: McPherson JA, Jones and Mullins JJSeparate reasons for judgment of each, member of the Court, each concurring as to the orders made
McPherson JA, Jones and Mullins JJSeparate reasons for judgment of each, member of the Court, each concurring as to the orders made
Catchwords
CRIMINAL LAW – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL AND INQUIRY AFTER CONVICTION
– APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – PARTICULAR GROUNDS –
UNREASONABLE OR
INSUPPORTABLE VERDICT – WHERE APPEAL ALLOWED – where Crown entered
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Catchwords
CRIMINAL LAW – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL AND INQUIRY AFTER CONVICTION– APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – PARTICULAR GROUNDS –UNREASONABLE ORINSUPPORTABLE VERDICT – WHERE APPEAL ALLOWED – where Crown enterednolle presequi in respect of one offive counts on the indictment –whether the complainant’s evidence could sustain the verdicts ofguiltyCRIMINAL LAW – PARTICULAR OFFENCES – OFFENCES AGAINSTTHE PERSON – OTHER OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON – SEXUALOFFENCES– BUGGERY AND INDECENT ASSAULT OR DEALING – PROOF ANDEVIDENCEJones v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 439, consideredMv The Queen [1994] HCA 63(1994) 181 CLR 487, appliedR v Aristidis [1998] QCA 422[1999] 2 QdR 629, consideredR v Markuleski [2001] NSWCCA 290, applied
Judgment (1 paragraphs)
[1]
R v M [2001] QCA 458 | Case summary | Zoe
Director of Public Prosecutions (Queensland) for the respondent