CTHHCA
R v Kelly; Ex parte Australian Railways Union
[1953] HCA 96
High Court of Australia|1953-07-01|Before: Taylor JJ
View original sourceAt a glance
Source factsCourt
High Court of Australia
Decision date
1953-07-01
Before
Taylor JJ
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Judgment (2 paragraphs)
[1]
For the reasons given I am of the opinion that the order nisi should be discharged.
[2]
The questions raised in these applications are in all respects similar to the questions raised for consideration in the previous case, but the facts disclose that at no time in any of these matters was any application made to the Arbitration Court by any party for a variation of an existing award. For the reasons already given, however, this is not a material circumstance; the Arbitration Court was entitled of its own motion to make the orders complained of and the orders nisi should therefore be discharged.
Parties
Applicant/Plaintiff:
R
Respondent/Defendant:
Kelly; Ex parte Australian Railways Union